Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic, Chronic-PhasePhase 3NCT00123474
Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) - Follow on: Study of BMS-354825 in Subjects With CML
A Phase 3 study testing dasatinib in people with Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic, Chronic-Phase, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 137 sites in 31 countries.
Trial summary
This is a phase III study of BMS-354825 in subjects with chronic phase Philadelphia chromosome or BCR-ABL positive chronic myelogenous leukemia, who are resistant or intolerant to imatinib mesylate (Gleevec). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic, Chronic-Phase
- What is being tested?
- dasatinib
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 724 participants
- Where
- 137 sitesin 31 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2005to Jul 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects with Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) (or BCR/ABL+) chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia whose disease has primary or acquired hematologic resistance to imatinib mesylate or who are intolerant of imatinib mesylate.
- Men and women, 18 years or older
- Adequate hepatic function
- Adequate renal function
- Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must be using an adequate method of contraception to avoid pregnancy throughout the study and for a period of at least 1 month before and at least 3 months after the study in such a manner that the risk of pregnancy is minimized.
Who cannot join
- Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
- Subjects who are eligible and willing to undergo transplantation during the screening period
- A serious uncontrolled medical disorder or active infection that would impair the ability of the subject to receive protocol therapy
- Uncontrolled or significant cardiovascular disease
- Medications that increase bleeding risk
- Medications that change heart rhythms
Show all 11Show fewer
- Dementia or altered mental status that would prohibit the understanding or rendering of informed consent
- History of significant bleeding disorder unrelated to CML
- Concurrent incurable malignancy other than CML
- Evidence of organ dysfunction or digestive dysfunction that would prevent administration of study therapy
- Prisoners or subjects who are compulsorily detained (involuntarily incarcerated) for treatment of either a psychiatric or physical (e.g., infectious disease) illness must not be enrolled into this study
Trial locations and contacts
137 sites in 31 countries.
137 sites in 31 countries
United States40 sites
Central Hematology Oncology Medical Group Inc.
Alhambra, California, 91801
Pacific Cancer Medical Center Inc
Anaheim, California, 92801
Emory University School Of Medicine
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Georgia Cancer Specialists
Atlanta, Georgia, 30341
University Of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
University Of Alabama At Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Dana Faber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Northwestern University Feinberg School Of Medicine
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
University Of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Ut Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
University Of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32610
The Cancer Center At Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
The University Of Texas Md Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Indiana University Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Nevada Cancer Institute
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89135
Gwinnett Hospital System Inc.
Lawrenceville, Georgia, 30046
University Of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536
Loma Linda University Cancer Center
Loma Linda, California, 92354
Pacific Shores Medical Group
Long Beach, California, 90813
Ucla Dept. Of Medicine
Los Angeles, California, 90095
University Of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33136
Sarah Cannon Research Institute
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
The Cancer Institute Of New Jersey
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08903
New York Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, 10021
Nebraska Methodist Hospital
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114
Devetten, Marcel
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198
Md Anderson Cancer Center Orlando
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Ventura County Hematology-Oncology Specialists
Oxnard, California, 93030
Oncology Hematology Associates Of Central Illinois, Pc
Peoria, Illinois, 61615
Western Pennsylvania Cancer Institute
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
Seattle, Washington, 98109
Washington University School Of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center
Vallejo, California, 94589
Georgetown University Med Ctr
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
Washington Cancer Institute At Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
University Of Kansas Medical Center
Westwood, Kansas, 66205
France11 sites
Local Institution
Caen, 14000
Local Institution
Cedex, Pierre Benite, 69495
Local Institution
Créteil, 94010
Local Institution
Grenoble, 38043
Local Institution
Lille, 59037
Local Institution
Marseille, 13273
Local Institution
Nantes, 44000
Local Institution
Paris, 75475
Local Institution
Poitiers, 86021
Local Institution
Strasbourg, 67091
Local Institution
Toulouse, 31059
Australia6 sites
Local Institution
Adelaide, South Australia, SA 5000
Local Institution
Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050
Local Institution
East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002
Local Institution
Perth, Western Australia, WA 6000
Local Institution
South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101
Local Institution
St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065
Belgium6 sites
Local Institution
B-leuven, 3000
Local Institution
Bruges, 8000
Local Institution
Brussels, 1000
Local Institution
Charleroi, 6000
Local Institution
Edegem, 2650
Local Institution
Yvoir, 5530
Germany6 sites
Local Institution
Dresden, 01307
Local Institution
Frankfurt am Main, 60590
Local Institution
Hamburg, 20246
Local Institution
Leipzig, 04103
Local Institution
Mainz, 55131
Local Institution
Mannheim, 68167
Italy6 sites
Local Institution
Bari, 70124
Local Institution
Monza (mi), 20052
Local Institution
Naples, 80131
Local Institution
Orbassano, 10043
Local Institution
Roma, 00144
Local Institution
Roma, 00161
Poland6 sites
Local Institution
Gdansk, 80 211
Local Institution
Katowice, 40032
Local Institution
Krakow, 31501
Local Institution
Lodz, 93510
Local Institution
Lublin, 20 950
Local Institution
Warsaw, 02097
United Kingdom6 sites
Local Institution
Birmingham, West Midlands, B15 2TH
Local Institution
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 2XY
Local Institution
Glasgow, G12 0ZD
Local Institution
Liverpool, Merseyside, L7 8XP
Local Institution
London, Greater London, W12 OHS
Local Institution
Newcastle, Tyne and Wear, NE2 2DR
Brazil5 sites
Local Institution
CEP - Campinas, 13083
Local Institution
Curitiba, Paraná, 80060
Local Institution
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 20231
Local Institution
San Paulo, Sp, 05403
Local Institution
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05652
South Africa5 sites
Local Institution
Bloemfontein, Free State, 9301
Local Institution
Groenkloof, Gauteng, 0181
Local Institution
Observatory, Western Cape, 7925
Local Institution
Parktown, Gauteng, 2193
Local Institution
Soweto, Gauteng, 2013
Argentina4 sites
Local Institution
Buenos Aires, 1221
Local Institution
Capital Federal, 1280
Local Institution
Córdoba, X5016KEH
Local Institution
La Plata, Buenos Aires, 1900
South Korea4 sites
Local Institution
Jeollanam-do, 519-809
Local Institution
Kyunggi-do, 480-130
Local Institution
Seoul, 110-744
Local Institution
Seoul, 138-736
Canada3 sites
Local Institution
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
Local Institution
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5
Local Institution
Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1S6
Denmark3 sites
Local Institution
Aarhus C, 8000
Local Institution
Herlev, 2730
Local Institution
Odense C, 5000
Spain3 sites
Local Institution
Madrid, 28006
Local Institution
Madrid, 28034
Local Institution
Pamplona, 31008
Netherlands2 sites
Local Institution
Nijmegen, 6525 GA
Local Institution
Rotterdam, 3075 EA
Peru2 sites
Local Institution
Jesus Maria, Lima region, 11
Local Institution
Lima, Lima Province, 34
Russia2 sites
Local Institution
Moscow, 125167
Local Institution
Saint Petersburg, 197022
Taiwan2 sites
Local Institution
Taipei, 100
Local Institution
Taoyuan County, 333
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Two-by-Two, Multicenter, Open-Label Phase III Study of BMS-354825 Administered Orally at a Dose of 50 mg or 70 mg Twice Daily or 100 mg or 140 mg Once Daily in Subjects With Chronic Phase Philadelphia Chromosome or BCR-ABL Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Who Are Resistant or Intolerant to Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec)
This is a phase III study of BMS-354825 in subjects with chronic phase Philadelphia chromosome or BCR-ABL positive chronic myelogenous leukemia, who are resistant or intolerant to imatinib mesylate (Gleevec).
- Conditions
- Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic, Chronic-Phase
- Being tested
- dasatinib
- Keywords
- Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-Phase
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
dasatinibDrug
Also called Sprycel, BMS-354825
Tablets, Oral, 50 mg BID, indefinitely, survival study
dasatinibDrug
Also called Sprycel, BMS-354825
Tablets, Oral, 70 mg BID, indefinitely, survival study
dasatinibDrug
Also called Sprycel, BMS-354825
Tablets, Oral, 100 mg QD, indefinitely, survival study
dasatinibDrug
Also called Sprycel, BMS-354825
Tablets, Oral, 140 mg QD, indefinitely, survival study
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: dasatinib |
| 2 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: dasatinib |
| 3 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: dasatinib |
| 4 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: dasatinib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent of Participants With Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) at 6 Months Follow-Up
Cytogenetic response (CyR) was based on the number of Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) metaphases among cells in metaphase on a Bone Marrow (BM) sample. The criteria for CyR were as follows: Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR): 0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Partial cytogenetic response (PCyR): >0 to 35% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Minor cytogenetic response: >35 to 65% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Minimal cytogenetic response: >65 to 95% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; No cytogenetic response: >95 to 100% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Best CyR was defined as the best response obtained at any time during the study; MCyR was defined as a best CyR of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) or partial cytogenetic response (PCyR). Baseline=closest to, but no later than, the first day of study drug for treated participants and closest to, but no later than, the date of randomization, for those who were randomized but who never received treatment, unless otherwise specified.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (21)
Percent of Participants With MCyR At or Prior to 24 Months Follow-Up
CyR was based on the number of Ph+ metaphases among cells in metaphase on a Bone Marrow (BM) sample. The criteria for CyR were as follows: CCyR: 0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; PCyR: >0 to 35% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Minor cytogenetic response: >35 to 65% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Minimal cytogenetic response: >65 to 95% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; No cytogenetic response: >95 to 100% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Best CyR was defined as the best response obtained at any time during the study; MCyR was defined as a best CyR of CCyR or PCyR. Baseline=closest to, but no later than, the first day of study drug for treated participants and closest to, but no later than, the date of randomization, for those who were randomized but who never received treatment, unless otherwise specified.
Measured: 24 months
Percent of Participants With Complete Hematologic Response (CHR) at 6 and 24 Months Follow-Up
A complete hematologic response (CHR) was obtained when all the following criteria were met: White Blood Cells (WBC) ≤ institutional upper limit of normal (ULN); Platelets < 450,000/mm³; No blasts or promyelocytes in peripheral blood (PB); < 5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in PB; Basophils in PB < 20%; No extramedullary involvement (including no splenomegaly or hepatomegaly). Hematologic responses were counted anytime following 14 days after the dosing start date.
Measured: 6 months, 24 months
Time to MCyR in Participants With MCyR at 6 Months Follow-Up
Time to MCyR was defined as the time from the first dosing date until criteria were first met for CCyR or PCyR, whichever occurred first. Non-responders were censored at the maximum time of all participants in their respective group (ie, maximum between time to MCyR response for responders and time to last cytogenetic assessment for non-responders).
Measured: 6 months
Time to CHR in Participants With CHR at 6 Months Follow-Up
Time to CHR was defined as the time from the first dosing date until criteria are first met for the response. Non-responders were censored at the maximum time of all participants in their respective group (ie, maximum between time to CHR response for responders and time to last hematologic assessment for non-responders).
Measured: 6 months
Time to MCyR in Participants With MCyR at 24 Months Follow-Up
Time to MCyR was defined as the time from the first dosing date until criteria were first met for CCyR or PCyR, whichever occurred first. Non-responders were censored at the maximum time of all participants in their respective group (ie, maximum between time to MCyR response for responders and time to last cytogenetic assessment for non-responders). Cytogenetic assessments were not done after the 2 Year Follow-up.
Measured: 24 months
Time to CHR in Participants With CHR At 24 Months Follow-Up
Time to CHR was defined as the time from the first dosing date until criteria are first met for the response. Non-responders were censored at the maximum time of all participants in their respective group (ie, maximum between time to CHR response for responders and time to last hematologic assessment for non-responders). Cytogenetic assessments were not done after the 2 Year Follow-up.
Measured: 24 months
Number of Participants With MCyR Whose Disease Progressed by 24 Months
Progression in a participant=participant achieved a CHR and no longer met the criteria consistently over consecutive 2-weeks after starting their maximum dose; had no CHR after receiving their maximum dose and had an increase in white blood count (WBC) defined as a doubling of the count from the lowest value to >20,000/mm^3 or an increase by > 50,000/mm^3 on two assessments performed at least 2 weeks apart; participant met criteria of accelerated or blast phase CML at any time; had a MCyR and subsequently no longer met the criteria for MCyR after starting their maximum dose; had a ≥ 30% absolute increase in the number of Ph+ metaphases. Although a related secondary endpoint was estimated duration of MCyR, medium duration of MCyR could not be estimated because the majority of participants with MCyR continued to respond, or could not be reliably estimated because of the large number of censored participants. Cytogenetic assessments were not done after the 24 month follow-up.
Measured: 24 months
Number of Participants With CHR Whose Disease Progressed by 24 Months
Progression in a participant=achieved a CHR and subsequently no longer met the criteria consistently over a consecutive 2-week period after starting their maximum dose; had no CHR after receiving their maximum dose and had an increase in white blood count (WBC) defined as a doubling of the count from the lowest value to >20,000/mm^3 or an increase by > 50,000/mm^3 on two assessments performed at least 2 weeks apart; met the criteria of accelerated or blast phase CML at any time; had a MCyR and subsequently no longer met the criteria for MCyR after starting their maximum dose; had a ≥ 30% absolute increase in the number of Ph+ metaphases. Although a related secondary endpoint was estimated duration of CHR, medium duration of CHR could not be estimated because the majority of participants with CHR continued to respond, or could not be reliably estimated because of the large number of censored participants.
Measured: 24 months
Number of Participants With MCyR and Baseline BCR-ABL Gene Mutation - All Treated Participants
BCR-ABL mutations were assessed in participants prior to the start of study drug (baseline) and at the time of disease progression or at end of therapy. Quantification of BCR-ABL transcripts in peripheral blood was evaluated using quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (Q-RT-PCR, RT-PCR).
Measured: Baseline up to 24 months
Percent of Imatinib-Resistant Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) at 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 Months Follow-Up
PFS= time from randomization until: CHR achieved and participant subsequently no longer met criteria for CHR over 2 weeks; no CHR after receiving maximum dose and an increase in WBC (ie, doubling of the count from the lowest value to > 20,000/mm^3 or an increase by > 50,000/mm^3 on 2 assessments performed 2 weeks apart); participant met criteria of accelerated phase or blast phase CML; participant had MCyR and subsequently no longer met criteria for MCyR after starting maximum dose; participant had a ≥ 30% absolute increase in number of Ph+ metaphases. Deaths without a reported prior progression were considered to have progressed on the date of death; those who neither progressed nor died were censored on the date of their last cytogenetic or hematologic assessment. When first progression reported during follow-up, it was censored at last on-study assessment. If the first progression reported during follow-up was death, participant considered to have progressed at date of death.
Measured: 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 months
Percent of Imatinib-Resistant Participants With Overall Survival (OS) at 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 Months Follow-Up
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization until death. Survival data were collected for up to 5 years on participants who had discontinued dasatinib treatment. Participants who did not die or who were lost to follow-up were censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive.
Measured: 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 months
Percent of Participants Intolerant to Imatinib With MCyR at 6 Months and at 24 Months Follow-Up, by QD and BID Schedules and by Total Daily Dose
CyR was based on the number of Ph+ metaphases among cells in metaphase on a BM sample. The criteria for CyR were as follows: complete cytogenetic response (CCyR): 0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; PCyR: >0 to 35% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Minor cytogenetic response: >35 to 65% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Minimal cytogenetic response: >65 to 95% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; No cytogenetic response: >95 to 100% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Best CyR was defined as the best response obtained at any time during the study; MCyR was defined as a best CyR of CCyR or PCyR.
Measured: 6 months, 24 months
Percent of Participants Intolerant to Imatinib With CHR at 6 Months and at 24 Months Follow-Up
A CHR was obtained when all the following criteria were met: White Blood Cells (WBC) ≤ institutional upper limit of normal (ULN); Platelets < 450,000/mm³; No blasts or promyelocytes in peripheral blood (PB); < 5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in PB; Basophils in PB < 20%; No extramedullary involvement (including no splenomegaly or hepatomegaly). Hematologic responses were counted anytime following 14 days after the dosing start date.
Measured: 6 months, 24 months
Percent of Imatinib Intolerant Participants With Progression Free Survival After 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 Months of Follow-Up
PFS= time from randomization until: CHR achieved and participant subsequently no longer met criteria for CHR over 2 weeks; no CHR after receiving maximum dose and an increase in WBC (ie, doubling of the count from the lowest value to > 20,000/mm^3 or an increase by > 50,000/mm^3 on 2 assessments performed 2 weeks apart); participant met criteria of accelerated phase or blast phase CML; participant had MCyR and subsequently no longer met criteria for MCyR after starting maximum dose; participant had a ≥ 30% absolute increase in number of Ph+ metaphases. Deaths without a reported prior progression were considered to have progressed on the date of death; those who neither progressed nor died were censored on the date of their last cytogenetic or hematologic assessment. When first progression reported during follow-up, it was censored at last on-study assessment. If the first progression reported during follow-up was death, participant considered to have progressed at date of death.
Measured: 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 months
Percent of Imatinib Intolerant Participants With Overall Survival After 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 Months of Follow-up
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization until death. Survival data were collected for up to 5 years on participants who had discontinued dasatinib treatment. Participants who did not die or who were lost to follow-up were censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive.
Measured: 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 months
Percent of All Randomized Participants With Cytogenic and Hematologic Response by Dosing Schedule (QD or BID) and by Total Daily Dose (100 mg or 140 mg) at 6 Months Follow-Up
Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR): 0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM. Partial cytogenetic response (PCyR): >0 to 35% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM. MCyR: best cytogenetic response of CCyR or PCyR. A complete hematologic response (CHR) was obtained when all the following criteria were met: White Blood Cells (WBC) ≤ institutional upper limit of normal (ULN); Platelets < 450,000/mm³; No blasts or promyelocytes in peripheral blood (PB); < 5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in PB; Basophils in PB < 20%; No extramedullary involvement (including no splenomegaly or hepatomegaly). Hematologic responses were counted anytime following 14 days after the dosing start date.
Measured: 6 months
Percent of All Randomized Participants With Cytogenic and Hematologic Response by Dosing Schedule (QD or BID) and by Total Daily Dose (100 mg or 140 mg) at 24 Months Follow-Up
Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR): 0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM. Partial cytogenetic response (PCyR): >0 to 35% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM. MCyR: best cytogenetic response of CCyR or PCyR. A complete hematologic response (CHR) was obtained when all the following criteria were met: White Blood Cells (WBC) ≤ institutional upper limit of normal (ULN); Platelets < 450,000/mm³; No blasts or promyelocytes in peripheral blood (PB); < 5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in PB; Basophils in PB < 20%; No extramedullary involvement (including no splenomegaly or hepatomegaly). Hematologic responses were counted anytime following 14 days after the dosing start date. No cytogenic assessments were made after 2 years of follow-up.
Measured: 24 months
Percent of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) at 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 Months Follow-Up by Dose Schedule and Total Daily Dose - All Randomized Participants
PFS= time from randomization until: CHR achieved and participant subsequently no longer met criteria for CHR over 2 weeks; no CHR after receiving maximum dose and an increase in WBC (ie, doubling of the count from the lowest value to > 20,000/mm^3 or an increase by > 50,000/mm^3 on 2 assessments performed 2 weeks apart); participant met criteria of accelerated phase or blast phase CML; participant had MCyR and subsequently no longer met criteria for MCyR after starting maximum dose; participant had a ≥ 30% absolute increase in number of Ph+ metaphases. Deaths without a reported prior progression were considered to have progressed on the date of death; those who neither progressed nor died were censored on the date of their last cytogenetic or hematologic assessment. When first progression reported during follow-up, it was censored at last on-study assessment. If the first progression reported during follow-up was death, participant considered to have progressed at date of death.
Measured: 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 months
Percent of Participants Overall Survival at 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 Months Follow-Up - All Randomized Participants
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization until death. Survival data were collected for up to 5 years on participants who had discontinued dasatinib treatment. Participants who did not die or who were lost to follow-up were censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive.
Measured: 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 months
Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) That Led to Treatment Discontinuation at 24 Months of Follow-up
AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Treatment-related=having certain, probable, possible, or missing relationship to study drug. Baseline=closest to, but no later than, the first day of study drug for treated participants.
Measured: Baseline to 30 days post last dose, up to 24 months
Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) That Led toTreatment Discontinuation After 7 Year Follow-up
AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Treatment-related=having certain, probable, possible, or missing relationship to study drug. Baseline=closest to, but no later than, the first day of study drug for treated participants. After the 2-year analysis and Protocol Amendment 02, those on a BID dosing schedule were allowed to switch to a QD dosing schedule. Due to the large number of participants switching from BID dosing to QD dosing, the abbreviated dosing data collection method incorporated in Amendment 03, the overall safety data are presented for the 100 mg QD group and combined for the other treatment groups.
Measured: Baseline to 30 days post last dose, up to 7 years (study closure July 2014)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jul 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2005
- Primary completionSep 2006
- Study completionJul 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic, Chronic-PhaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bristol-Myers SquibbThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 724 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Study director, Bristol-Myers Squibb
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00123474
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CA180-034
- Status last verified
- Jul 2016
- First submitted
- 21 Jul 2005
- Last updated
- 25 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Porkka K, Khoury HJ, Paquette RL, Matloub Y, Sinha R, Cortes JE. Dasatinib 100 mg once daily minimizes the occurrence of pleural effusion in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase and efficacy is unaffected in patients who develop pleural effusion. Cancer. 2010 Jan 15;116(2):377-86. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24734.
PubMed 19924787Muller MC, Cortes JE, Kim DW, Druker BJ, Erben P, Pasquini R, Branford S, Hughes TP, Radich JP, Ploughman L, Mukhopadhyay J, Hochhaus A. Dasatinib treatment of chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: analysis of responses according to preexisting BCR-ABL mutations. Blood. 2009 Dec 3;114(24):4944-53. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-04-214221. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
PubMed 19779040Shah NP, Kantarjian HM, Kim DW, Rea D, Dorlhiac-Llacer PE, Milone JH, Vela-Ojeda J, Silver RT, Khoury HJ, Charbonnier A, Khoroshko N, Paquette RL, Deininger M, Collins RH, Otero I, Hughes T, Bleickardt E, Strauss L, Francis S, Hochhaus A. Intermittent target inhibition with dasatinib 100 mg once daily preserves efficacy and improves tolerability in imatinib-resistant and -intolerant chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 1;26(19):3204-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9260. Epub 2008 Jun 9.
PubMed 18541900Shah NP, Rousselot P, Schiffer C, Rea D, Cortes JE, Milone J, Mohamed H, Healey D, Kantarjian H, Hochhaus A, Saglio G. Dasatinib in imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic-phase, chronic myeloid leukemia patients: 7-year follow-up of study CA180-034. Am J Hematol. 2016 Sep;91(9):869-74. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24423. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
PubMed 27192969Shah NP, Guilhot F, Cortes JE, Schiffer CA, le Coutre P, Brummendorf TH, Kantarjian HM, Hochhaus A, Rousselot P, Mohamed H, Healey D, Cunningham M, Saglio G. Long-term outcome with dasatinib after imatinib failure in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: follow-up of a phase 3 study. Blood. 2014 Apr 10;123(15):2317-24. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-10-532341. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
PubMed 24569263
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Two-by-Two, Multicenter, Open-Label Phase III Study of BMS-354825 Administered Orally at a Dose of 50 mg or 70 mg Twice Daily or 100 mg or 140 mg Once Daily in Subjects With Chronic Phase Philadelphia Chromosome or BCR-ABL Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Who Are Resistant or Intolerant to Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00123474
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CA180-034
- Conditions
- Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic, Chronic-Phase
- Keywords
- Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 724 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers SquibbIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2005
- Primary completion
- Sep 2006 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Jul 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 26 Aug 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a phase III study of BMS-354825 in subjects with chronic phase Philadelphia chromosome or BCR-ABL positive chronic myelogenous leukemia, who are resistant or intolerant to imatinib mesylate (Gleevec).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: dasatinib |
| 2 | Experimental | Drug: dasatinib |
| 3 | Experimental | Drug: dasatinib |
| 4 | Experimental | Drug: dasatinib |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Subjects with Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) (or BCR/ABL+) chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia whose disease has primary or acquired hematologic resistance to imatinib mesylate or who are intolerant of imatinib mesylate.
- Men and women, 18 years or older
- Adequate hepatic function
- Adequate renal function
- Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must be using an adequate method of contraception to avoid pregnancy throughout the study and for a period of at least 1 month before and at least 3 months after the study in such a manner that the risk of pregnancy is minimized.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
- Subjects who are eligible and willing to undergo transplantation during the screening period
- A serious uncontrolled medical disorder or active infection that would impair the ability of the subject to receive protocol therapy
- Uncontrolled or significant cardiovascular disease
- Medications that increase bleeding risk
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| dasatinibAlso: Sprycel, BMS-354825Tablets, Oral, 50 mg BID, indefinitely, survival study | Drug | 1 |
| dasatinibAlso: Sprycel, BMS-354825Tablets, Oral, 70 mg BID, indefinitely, survival study | Drug | 2 |
| dasatinibAlso: Sprycel, BMS-354825Tablets, Oral, 100 mg QD, indefinitely, survival study | Drug | 3 |
| dasatinibAlso: Sprycel, BMS-354825Tablets, Oral, 140 mg QD, indefinitely, survival study | Drug | 4 |
Primary outcome
Percent of Participants With Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) at 6 Months Follow-Up
Time frame: 6 months
Cytogenetic response (CyR) was based on the number of Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) metaphases among cells in metaphase on a Bone Marrow (BM) sample. The criteria for CyR were as follows: Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR): 0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Partial cytogenetic response (PCyR): >0 to 35% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Minor cytogenetic response: >35 to 65% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Minimal cytogenetic response: >65 to 95% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; No cytogenetic response: >95 to 100% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Best CyR was defined as the best response obtained at any time during the study; MCyR was defined as a best CyR of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) or partial cytogenetic response (PCyR). Baseline=closest to, but no later than, the first day of study drug for treated participants and closest to, but no later than, the date of randomization, for those who were randomized but who never received treatment, unless otherwise specified.
21 secondary outcomes
Percent of Participants With MCyR At or Prior to 24 Months Follow-Up
Time frame: 24 months
Percent of Participants With Complete Hematologic Response (CHR) at 6 and 24 Months Follow-Up
Time frame: 6 months, 24 months
Time to MCyR in Participants With MCyR at 6 Months Follow-Up
Time frame: 6 months
Time to CHR in Participants With CHR at 6 Months Follow-Up
Time frame: 6 months
Time to MCyR in Participants With MCyR at 24 Months Follow-Up
Time frame: 24 months
Time to CHR in Participants With CHR At 24 Months Follow-Up
Time frame: 24 months
Number of Participants With MCyR Whose Disease Progressed by 24 Months
Time frame: 24 months
Number of Participants With CHR Whose Disease Progressed by 24 Months
Time frame: 24 months
Number of Participants With MCyR and Baseline BCR-ABL Gene Mutation - All Treated Participants
Time frame: Baseline up to 24 months
Percent of Imatinib-Resistant Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) at 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 Months Follow-Up
Time frame: 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 months
Percent of Imatinib-Resistant Participants With Overall Survival (OS) at 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 Months Follow-Up
Time frame: 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 months
Percent of Participants Intolerant to Imatinib With MCyR at 6 Months and at 24 Months Follow-Up, by QD and BID Schedules and by Total Daily Dose
Time frame: 6 months, 24 months
Percent of Participants Intolerant to Imatinib With CHR at 6 Months and at 24 Months Follow-Up
Time frame: 6 months, 24 months
Percent of Imatinib Intolerant Participants With Progression Free Survival After 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 Months of Follow-Up
Time frame: 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 months
Percent of Imatinib Intolerant Participants With Overall Survival After 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 Months of Follow-up
Time frame: 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 months
Percent of All Randomized Participants With Cytogenic and Hematologic Response by Dosing Schedule (QD or BID) and by Total Daily Dose (100 mg or 140 mg) at 6 Months Follow-Up
Time frame: 6 months
Percent of All Randomized Participants With Cytogenic and Hematologic Response by Dosing Schedule (QD or BID) and by Total Daily Dose (100 mg or 140 mg) at 24 Months Follow-Up
Time frame: 24 months
Percent of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) at 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 Months Follow-Up by Dose Schedule and Total Daily Dose - All Randomized Participants
Time frame: 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 months
Percent of Participants Overall Survival at 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 Months Follow-Up - All Randomized Participants
Time frame: 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 months
Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) That Led to Treatment Discontinuation at 24 Months of Follow-up
Time frame: Baseline to 30 days post last dose, up to 24 months
Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) That Led toTreatment Discontinuation After 7 Year Follow-up
Time frame: Baseline to 30 days post last dose, up to 7 years (study closure July 2014)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Aug 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 19924787Porkka K, Khoury HJ, Paquette RL, Matloub Y, Sinha R, Cortes JE. Dasatinib 100 mg once daily minimizes the occurrence of pleural effusion in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase and efficacy is unaffected in patients who develop pleural effusion. Cancer. 2010 Jan 15;116(2):377-86. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24734.
- Background: PubMed 19779040Muller MC, Cortes JE, Kim DW, Druker BJ, Erben P, Pasquini R, Branford S, Hughes TP, Radich JP, Ploughman L, Mukhopadhyay J, Hochhaus A. Dasatinib treatment of chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: analysis of responses according to preexisting BCR-ABL mutations. Blood. 2009 Dec 3;114(24):4944-53. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-04-214221. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
- Background: PubMed 18541900Shah NP, Kantarjian HM, Kim DW, Rea D, Dorlhiac-Llacer PE, Milone JH, Vela-Ojeda J, Silver RT, Khoury HJ, Charbonnier A, Khoroshko N, Paquette RL, Deininger M, Collins RH, Otero I, Hughes T, Bleickardt E, Strauss L, Francis S, Hochhaus A. Intermittent target inhibition with dasatinib 100 mg once daily preserves efficacy and improves tolerability in imatinib-resistant and -intolerant chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 1;26(19):3204-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9260. Epub 2008 Jun 9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27192969Shah NP, Rousselot P, Schiffer C, Rea D, Cortes JE, Milone J, Mohamed H, Healey D, Kantarjian H, Hochhaus A, Saglio G. Dasatinib in imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic-phase, chronic myeloid leukemia patients: 7-year follow-up of study CA180-034. Am J Hematol. 2016 Sep;91(9):869-74. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24423. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24569263Shah NP, Guilhot F, Cortes JE, Schiffer CA, le Coutre P, Brummendorf TH, Kantarjian HM, Hochhaus A, Rousselot P, Mohamed H, Healey D, Cunningham M, Saglio G. Long-term outcome with dasatinib after imatinib failure in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: follow-up of a phase 3 study. Blood. 2014 Apr 10;123(15):2317-24. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-10-532341. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
Related trials for Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic, Chronic-Phase
RecruitingPhase 1
Vididencel in CML-CP Patients With MRD
CML (Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Collecting Blood Samples From Patients With and Without Cancer to Evaluate Tests for Early Cancer Detection
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
Phase 1 Study of 6MW5311 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Blood Cancers
AML, Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 2
Personalized NK Cell Therapy in CBT
Accelerated Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, BCR-ABL1 Positive, Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bristol-Myers Squibb study director
Bristol-Myers Squibb
137 sites in 31 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing dasatinib in people with Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic, Chronic-Phase, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 137 sites in 31 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 137 sites in United States, France, Australia, Belgium, Germany and 26 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Aug 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent of Participants With Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) at 6 Months Follow-Up (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00123474, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Aug 2016.