Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Phase 3NCT00121667
Study Assessing Saxagliptin Treatment In Type 2 Diabetic Subjects Who Are Not Controlled With Metformin Alone
A Phase 3 study testing Saxagliptin + Metformin and Pioglitazone in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by AstraZeneca at 152 sites in 9 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn whether Saxagliptin added to Metformin therapy is more effective than Metformin alone as a treatment for type 2 diabetic subjects who are not sufficiently controlled with Metformin alone Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 77 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- What is being tested?
- Saxagliptin + Metformin and Pioglitazone
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 1,462 participants
- Where
- 152 sitesin 9 countries
- Study dates
- Aug 2005to Feb 2010
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 77 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus requiring treatment with at least 1500 mg but not greater than 2550 mg of a maximum tolerated dose of Metformin therapy for at least 8 weeks prior to screening.
- HbA1c >= 7.0% and <= 10.0 %
- Body mass index <= 40 kg/m2
- Fasting C-peptide >= 1 ng/dL
Who cannot join
- Symptomatic poorly controlled diabetes
- Recent cardiac or cerebrovascular event
- Serum creatinine >= 1.5 mg/dL for males and >= 1.4 mg/dL for females
Trial locations and contacts
152 sites in 9 countries.
152 sites in 9 countries
United States95 sites
Local Institution
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Local Institution
Altamonte Springs, Florida
Local Institution
Anniston, Alabama
Local Institution
Athens, Ohio
Local Institution
Austin, Texas
Local Institution
Baltimore, Maryland
Local Institution
Birmingham, Alabama
Local Institution
Boston, Massachusetts
Local Institution
Bristol, Tennessee
Local Institution
Bryan, Texas
Local Institution
Calera, Alabama
Local Institution
Carlisle, Pennsylvania
Local Institution
Carrollton, Texas
Local Institution
Castle Rock, Colorado
Local Institution
Charleston, South Carolina
Local Institution
Charlotte, North Carolina
Local Institution
Chester, Maryland
Local Institution
Chicago, Illinois
Local Institution
Chipley, Florida
Local Institution
Cocoa Beach, Florida
Local Institution
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Local Institution
Columbus, Ohio
Local Institution
Coral Gables, Florida
Local Institution
Dallas, Texas
Local Institution
Decatur, Georgia
Local Institution
Denver, Colorado
Local Institution
Duncan, South Carolina
Local Institution
Elkhart, Indiana
Local Institution
Encino, California
Local Institution
Eugene, Oregon
Local Institution
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Local Institution
Fountain Valley, California
Local Institution
Fresno, California
Local Institution
Golden, Colorado
Local Institution
Greensboro, North Carolina
Local Institution
Haleyville, Alabama
Local Institution
Hampton, Virginia
Local Institution
Houston, Texas
Local Institution
Iowa City, Iowa
Local Institution
Jacksonville, Florida
Local Institution
Jonesboro, Arkansas
Local Institution
Kalispell, Montana
Local Institution
Kansas City, Missouri
Local Institution
Kissimmee, Florida
Local Institution
Lafayette, Indiana
Local Institution
Langhorne, Pennsylvania
Local Institution
Las Vegas, Nevada
Local Institution
Levittown, Pennsylvania
Local Institution
Lexington, Kentucky
Local Institution
Little Rock, Arkansas
Local Institution
Los Angeles, California
Local Institution
Loveland, Colorado
Local Institution
Lyndhurst, Ohio
Local Institution
Marianna, Florida
Local Institution
Mesa, Arizona
Local Institution
Miami, Florida
Local Institution
Mission Viejo, California
Local Institution
Morehead City, North Carolina
Local Institution
Munfordville, Kentucky
Local Institution
New Orleans, Louisiana
Local Institution
New Port Richey, Florida
Local Institution
Northridge, California
Local Institution
Ocala, Florida
Local Institution
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Local Institution
Olympia, Washington
Local Institution
Omaha, Nebraska
Local Institution
Orange, California
Local Institution
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Local Institution
Phoenix, Arizona
Local Institution
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Local Institution
Portland, Oregon
Local Institution
Prince Frederick, Maryland
Local Institution
Roseville, California
Local Institution
Sacramento, California
Local Institution
Salisbury, North Carolina
Local Institution
Salt Lake City, Utah
Local Institution
San Antonio, Texas
Local Institution
Sherwood, Arkansas
Local Institution
Sparta, North Carolina
Local Institution
Spokane, Washington
Local Institution
Spring Valley, California
Local Institution
St Louis, Missouri
Local Institution
Tallahassee, Florida
Local Institution
Tampa, Florida
Local Institution
Temple, Texas
Local Institution
Toms River, New Jersey
Local Institution
Topeka, Kansas
Local Institution
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Local Institution
Tustin, California
Local Institution
Vernon Hills, Illinois
Local Institution
Virginia Beach, Virginia
Local Institution
Waterloo, Iowa
Local Institution
West Monroe, Louisiana
Local Institution
Wilmington, North Carolina
Local Institution
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Canada23 sites
Local Institution
Aylmer, Ontario
Local Institution
Bathurst, New Brunswick
Local Institution
Brandon, Manitoba
Local Institution
Calgary, Alberta
Local Institution
Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island
Local Institution
Coquitlam, British Columbia
Local Institution
Drummondville, Quebec
Local Institution
Fleurimont, Quebec
Local Institution
Kelowna, British Columbia
Local Institution
London, Ontario
Local Institution
Longueuil, Quebec
Local Institution
Mount Pearl, Newfoundland and Labrador
Local Institution
Oakville, Ontario
Local Institution
Portage la Prairie, Manitoba
Local Institution
Saint-Léonard, Quebec
Local Institution
Sarnia, Ontario
Local Institution
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Local Institution
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador
Local Institution
Surrey, British Columbia
Local Institution
Thornhill, Ontario
Local Institution
Toronto, Ontario
Local Institution
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Local Institution
Woodstock, Ontario
Australia8 sites
Local Institution
Adelaide, South Australia
Local Institution
Brisbane, Queensland
Local Institution
Kippa-Ring, Queensland
Local Institution
Meadowbrook, Queensland
Local Institution
Perth, Western Australia
Local Institution
Sydney, New South Wales
Local Institution
Woodville South, South Australia
Local Institution
Woollongong, New South Wales
Mexico8 sites
Local Institution
Celaya, Guanajuato
Local Institution
Distrito Federal, Mexico City
Local Institution
Durango, Durango
Local Institution
Guadalajara, Jalisco
Local Institution
Hermosillo, Sonora
Local Institution
Mérida, Yucatán
Local Institution
Monterrey, Nuevo León
Local Institution
Morelia, Michioacan
Brazil6 sites
Local Institution
Belém, Pará
Local Institution
Campinas, São Paulo
Local Institution
Fortaleza, Ceará
Local Institution
Marília, São Paulo
Local Institution
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul
Local Institution
São Paulo, São Paulo
Argentina4 sites
Local Institution
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires
Local Institution
Córdoba, Córdoba Province
Local Institution
Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires
Local Institution
Rosario, Santa Fe Province
Puerto Rico4 sites
Local Institution
Carolina
Local Institution
Ponce
Local Institution
Rio Pieoras
Local Institution
San Juan
Taiwan3 sites
Local Institution
Hualien City
Local Institution
Taichung
Local Institution
Taipei
About this study
Official title: "A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BMS-477118 in Combination With Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin Alone"
The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn whether Saxagliptin added to Metformin therapy is more effective than Metformin alone as a treatment for type 2 diabetic subjects who are not sufficiently controlled with Metformin alone
Read the detailed description
All subjects will participate in a lead-in period, and qualifying subjects will continue into a short-term randomized treatment period. Subjects who complete the short-term period will be eligible to enter the long term extension period. Also, subjects in the short-term period who have an elevated blood sugar that requires additional medication for blood sugar control will be eligible to enter the long-term treatment extension period where they will receive pioglitizone added onto their blinded study medication
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Being tested
- Saxagliptin + Metformin, Placebo + Metformin, Pioglitazone
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Saxagliptin + MetforminDrug
Also called BMS-477118
Tablets, Oral, 2.5 mg Saxagliptin (plus flexible metformin dose), Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT)
Saxagliptin + MetforminDrug
Also called BMS-477118
Tablets, Oral, 5 mg Saxagliptin (plus flexible metformin dose), Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT)
Saxagliptin + MetforminDrug
Also called BMS-477118
Tablets, Oral, 10 mg Saxagliptin (plus flexible metformin dose), Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT)
Placebo + MetforminDrug
Tablets, Oral, 0 mg, Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT)
PioglitazoneDrug
Tablets, Oral, 15 - 45 mg (as needed for rescue)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Saxagliptin + Metformin (A) | Experimental | Pioglitazone 15-45 mg (as needed for rescue) Receives: Drug: Saxagliptin + Metformin; Drug: Pioglitazone |
| Saxagliptin + Metformin (B) | Experimental | Pioglitazone 15-45 mg (as needed for rescue) Receives: Drug: Saxagliptin + Metformin; Drug: Pioglitazone |
| Saxagliptin + Metformin (C) | Experimental | Pioglitazone 15-45 mg (as needed for rescue) Receives: Drug: Saxagliptin + Metformin; Drug: Pioglitazone |
| Placebo+ Metformin (D) | Placebo comparator | Pioglitazone 15-45 mg (as needed for rescue) Receives: Drug: Placebo + Metformin; Drug: Pioglitazone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Baseline and Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) at Week 24
Mean change from baseline is adjusted for baseline value.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Secondary outcomes (3)
Baseline and Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24
Mean change from baseline is adjusted for baseline value.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving Therapeutic Glycemic Response (A1C < 7.0%) at Week 24
Measured: Week 24
Baseline and Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Postprandial Glucose (PPG) Area Under the Curve (AUC)
Mean change from baseline is adjusted for baseline value.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jul 2005 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2005
- Primary completionOct 2006
- Study completionFeb 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AstraZenecaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 1,462 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AstraZeneca
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00121667
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CV181-014
- Status last verified
- Mar 2015
- First submitted
- 18 Jul 2005
- Last updated
- 29 Apr 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
DeFronzo RA, Hissa MN, Garber AJ, Luiz Gross J, Yuyan Duan R, Ravichandran S, Chen RS; Saxagliptin 014 Study Group. The efficacy and safety of saxagliptin when added to metformin therapy in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes with metformin alone. Diabetes Care. 2009 Sep;32(9):1649-55. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1984. Epub 2009 May 28.
PubMed 19478198Bailey CJ, Del Prato S, Wei C, Reyner D, Saraiva G. Durability of glycaemic control with dapagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, compared with saxagliptin, a DPP4 inhibitor, in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Nov;21(11):2564-2569. doi: 10.1111/dom.13841. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
PubMed 31364269Perl S, Cook W, Wei C, Iqbal N, Hirshberg B. Saxagliptin Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Moderate Renal Impairment. Diabetes Ther. 2016 Sep;7(3):527-35. doi: 10.1007/s13300-016-0184-9. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
PubMed 27402391Bonora E, Bryzinski B, Hirshberg B, Cook W. A post hoc analysis of saxagliptin efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes stratified by UKPDS 10-year cardiovascular risk score. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 May;26(5):374-9. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
PubMed 27033025Rosenstock J, Gross JL, Aguilar-Salinas C, Hissa M, Berglind N, Ravichandran S, Fleming D. Long-term 4-year safety of saxagliptin in drug-naive and metformin-treated patients with Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2013 Dec;30(12):1472-6. doi: 10.1111/dme.12267. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
PubMed 23802840Karyekar CS, Frederich R, Ravichandran S. Clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c without hypoglycaemia: results across four studies of saxagliptin. Int J Clin Pract. 2013 Aug;67(8):759-67. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12212. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
PubMed 23795975Karyekar C, Donovan M, Allen E, Fleming D, Ravichandran S, Chen R. Efficacy and safety of saxagliptin combination therapy in US patients with type 2 diabetes. Postgrad Med. 2011 Jul;123(4):63-70. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2011.07.2305.
PubMed 21680990
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Apr 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- "A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BMS-477118 in Combination With Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin Alone"
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00121667
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CV181-014
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,462 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AstraZenecaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Aug 2005
- Primary completion
- Oct 2006 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jul 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 Apr 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn whether Saxagliptin added to Metformin therapy is more effective than Metformin alone as a treatment for type 2 diabetic subjects who are not sufficiently controlled with Metformin alone
Detailed description
All subjects will participate in a lead-in period, and qualifying subjects will continue into a short-term randomized treatment period. Subjects who complete the short-term period will be eligible to enter the long term extension period. Also, subjects in the short-term period who have an elevated blood sugar that requires additional medication for blood sugar control will be eligible to enter the long-term treatment extension period where they will receive pioglitizone added onto their blinded study medication
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Saxagliptin + Metformin (A) | Experimental | Drug: Saxagliptin + Metformin, Drug: PioglitazonePioglitazone 15-45 mg (as needed for rescue) |
| Saxagliptin + Metformin (B) | Experimental | Drug: Saxagliptin + Metformin, Drug: PioglitazonePioglitazone 15-45 mg (as needed for rescue) |
| Saxagliptin + Metformin (C) | Experimental | Drug: Saxagliptin + Metformin, Drug: PioglitazonePioglitazone 15-45 mg (as needed for rescue) |
| Placebo+ Metformin (D) | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo + Metformin, Drug: PioglitazonePioglitazone 15-45 mg (as needed for rescue) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 77 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus requiring treatment with at least 1500 mg but not greater than 2550 mg of a maximum tolerated dose of Metformin therapy for at least 8 weeks prior to screening.
- HbA1c >= 7.0% and <= 10.0 %
- Body mass index <= 40 kg/m2
- Fasting C-peptide >= 1 ng/dL
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Symptomatic poorly controlled diabetes
- Recent cardiac or cerebrovascular event
- Serum creatinine >= 1.5 mg/dL for males and >= 1.4 mg/dL for females
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Saxagliptin + MetforminAlso: BMS-477118Tablets, Oral, 2.5 mg Saxagliptin (plus flexible metformin dose), Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT) | Drug | Saxagliptin + Metformin (A) |
| Saxagliptin + MetforminAlso: BMS-477118Tablets, Oral, 5 mg Saxagliptin (plus flexible metformin dose), Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT) | Drug | Saxagliptin + Metformin (B) |
| Saxagliptin + MetforminAlso: BMS-477118Tablets, Oral, 10 mg Saxagliptin (plus flexible metformin dose), Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT) | Drug | Saxagliptin + Metformin (C) |
| Placebo + MetforminTablets, Oral, 0 mg, Once daily (24 weeks ST, 42 months LT) | Drug | Placebo+ Metformin (D) |
| PioglitazoneTablets, Oral, 15 - 45 mg (as needed for rescue) | Drug | Placebo+ Metformin (D), Saxagliptin + Metformin (A), Saxagliptin + Metformin (B), Saxagliptin + Metformin (C) |
Primary outcome
Baseline and Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Mean change from baseline is adjusted for baseline value.
3 secondary outcomes
Baseline and Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving Therapeutic Glycemic Response (A1C < 7.0%) at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Baseline and Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Postprandial Glucose (PPG) Area Under the Curve (AUC)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Apr 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 19478198DeFronzo RA, Hissa MN, Garber AJ, Luiz Gross J, Yuyan Duan R, Ravichandran S, Chen RS; Saxagliptin 014 Study Group. The efficacy and safety of saxagliptin when added to metformin therapy in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes with metformin alone. Diabetes Care. 2009 Sep;32(9):1649-55. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1984. Epub 2009 May 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31364269Bailey CJ, Del Prato S, Wei C, Reyner D, Saraiva G. Durability of glycaemic control with dapagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, compared with saxagliptin, a DPP4 inhibitor, in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Nov;21(11):2564-2569. doi: 10.1111/dom.13841. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27402391Perl S, Cook W, Wei C, Iqbal N, Hirshberg B. Saxagliptin Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Moderate Renal Impairment. Diabetes Ther. 2016 Sep;7(3):527-35. doi: 10.1007/s13300-016-0184-9. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27033025Bonora E, Bryzinski B, Hirshberg B, Cook W. A post hoc analysis of saxagliptin efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes stratified by UKPDS 10-year cardiovascular risk score. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 May;26(5):374-9. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23802840Rosenstock J, Gross JL, Aguilar-Salinas C, Hissa M, Berglind N, Ravichandran S, Fleming D. Long-term 4-year safety of saxagliptin in drug-naive and metformin-treated patients with Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2013 Dec;30(12):1472-6. doi: 10.1111/dme.12267. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23795975Karyekar CS, Frederich R, Ravichandran S. Clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c without hypoglycaemia: results across four studies of saxagliptin. Int J Clin Pract. 2013 Aug;67(8):759-67. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12212. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21680990Karyekar C, Donovan M, Allen E, Fleming D, Ravichandran S, Chen R. Efficacy and safety of saxagliptin combination therapy in US patients with type 2 diabetes. Postgrad Med. 2011 Jul;123(4):63-70. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2011.07.2305.
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
152 sites in 9 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Saxagliptin + Metformin and Pioglitazone in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by AstraZeneca at 152 sites in 9 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 152 sites in United States, Canada, Australia, Mexico, Brazil and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Apr 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Baseline and Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) at Week 24 (time frame: Baseline, Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00121667, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2015.