Heart Failure, CongestiveNCT00121472
Thoratec HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System (LVAS) for Bridge to Cardiac Transplantation
A study testing Thoratec HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System (LVAS) in people with Heart Failure, Congestive and Ventricular Dysfunction, run by Abbott Medical Devices at 36 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of the Thoratec HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System (LVAS) as a bridge to cardiac transplantation in end-stage heart failure patients who are listed for cardiac transplant but are at imminent risk of dying. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure, Congestive, Ventricular Dysfunction, Cardiomyopathies
- What is being tested?
- Thoratec HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System (LVAS)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 194 participants
- Where
- 36 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 2005to May 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The following are general criteria; more specific conditions are included in the study protocol:
- Listed for cardiac transplantation
- NYHA Class IV heart failure symptoms
- On inotropic support, if tolerated
- Despite medical therapy, the patient must meet hemodynamic criteria for cardiogenic shock
Who cannot join
- The following are general criteria; more specific conditions are included in the study protocol:
- Evidence of, or risk factors for end-organ dysfunction that would make LVAS implantation futile
- Existence of factors that would adversely affect patient survival or function of the LVAS.
- Intolerance to anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapies.
- Existence of any ongoing mechanical circulatory support other than intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation.
- Participation in any other clinical investigation that is likely to confound study results or affect study outcome.
Trial locations and contacts
36 sites in 2 countries.
36 sites in 2 countries
United States34 sites
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43212
Medical City Hospital Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75230
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Shands Hospital @ University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32610
Texas Heart Institute
Houston, Texas, 77030
Methodist Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46206
Jewish Hospital
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
University of Wisconsin Medical School
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
Baptist Memorial Hospital
Memphis, Tennessee, 38120
St. Luke's Medical Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
New York Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
Newark Beth Israel Medical Center
Newark, New Jersey, 07112
Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, 23510
INTEGRIS Baptist Medical Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112
Hospital of University of PA
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Mayo Clinic Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, 85054
Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14642
LDS Hospital
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84143
Sharp Memorial Hospital
San Diego, California, 92123
California Pacific Medical Center
San Francisco, California, 94115
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Sacred Heart Medical Center
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Barnes-Jewish Hospital/Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10467
Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
Canada2 sites
Hospital Royal Victoria / McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2N2
About this study
Official title: The HeartMate II LVAS Pivotal Study Protocol, Bridge to Cardiac Transplantation
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of the Thoratec HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System (LVAS) as a bridge to cardiac transplantation in end-stage heart failure patients who are listed for cardiac transplant but are at imminent risk of dying.
The HeartMate II LVAS was approved by the US FDA on April 21, 2008, as a bridge to cardiac transplantation (reference PMA P060040). It was approved for commercial distribution in Canada on May 20, 2009 (reference Medical Device Licence #79765). Patients enrolled into the clinical trial will continue to be followed until all have reached a clinical outcome.
Read the detailed description
The HeartMate II is a high speed, electric, axial flow, rotary blood pump. The pump drains blood from the left ventricular apex via a rigid inlet cannula and ejects into the aortic root via an outflow cannula joined to the aorta with an end to side anastomosis. Power and control of the pump are delivered through a percutaneous cable from the pump to the belt-worn System Driver. Patient outcomes will be compared to objective performance criteria based on historical data from other Thoratec implantable ventricular assist devices.
- Being tested
- Thoratec HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System (LVAS)
- Keywords
- Heart-assist devices
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure, Ventricular Dysfunction, Cardiomyopathies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Thoratec HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System (LVAS)Device
Also called Thoratec, HeartMate II, Ventricular assist
Implantation of ventricular assist device to provide hemodynamic support
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Survival
Survival to cardiac transplantation or 180 days on left ventricular assist system (LVAS) support while remaining listed for cardiac transplantation as United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS)status 1A or 1B (please refer to www.unos.org for complete definitions of status).
Measured: 180 days
Secondary outcomes (7)
Clinical Reliability (Malfunctions/Failures)
Confirmed malfunctions/Serious Adverse Events
Measured: continuous
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionaire (KCCQ)
KCCQ is a validated instrument to self assess quality of life including physical function and social function. The instrument provides two scores, the Overall Summary (OSS) and Clinical Summary (CSS). Scores are calculated based on responses to the questionnaire, on a scale from 0-100. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. The patients' scores at six months were compared to their baseline scores and the resulting positive scores indicated improved quality of life.
Measured: baseline to 6 months
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification
NYHA relates symptoms to every day activities and patients quality of life. Class 1 = no limitations on physical activity Class 2 - slight limitation of physical activity Class 3 - marked limitation of physical activity Class 4 = unable to carry out any physical activity without discomfort
Measured: baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHF)
MLWHF is a validated instrument to self assess how heart failure and its treatment affect the key physical, emotional, social and psychological dimensions of quality of life. The instrument is made up of 21 items that assess the patient's perception of these dimensions on a scale ranging from no (0) to very much (5). The total MLWHF score is calculated by adding the scores for all 21 items (range, 0-105). A lower score indicates a better quality of life. The patients' score at six months was compared to their baseline score and the resulting negative score indicates improved quality of life.
Measured: Baseline to 6 months
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
The Six Minute Walk Test(6MWT)measures the distance that a patient can walk in a period of 6 minutes. The distance walked is measured in meters. This test measures the patients' functional status. The more meters a patient can walk over baseline indicates improvement in functional status.
Measured: baseline to 6 months
Reoperations
Additional surgery after the initial implant operation
Measured: continuous
Post-transplant Survival
30 day and 1 year post transplant survival
Measured: 30 days, 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jul 2005 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2005
- Primary completionNov 2006
- Study completionMay 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart Failure, CongestiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Abbott Medical DevicesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 194 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical Devices
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Thoratec Corporation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pooja Chatterjee, Study director, Thoratec Corporation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00121472
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TC010230-1
- Status last verified
- Jun 2022
- First submitted
- 12 Jul 2005
- Last updated
- 27 Jun 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Miller LW, Pagani FD, Russell SD, John R, Boyle AJ, Aaronson KD, Conte JV, Naka Y, Mancini D, Delgado RM, MacGillivray TE, Farrar DJ, Frazier OH; HeartMate II Clinical Investigators. Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 30;357(9):885-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067758.
PubMed 17761592Brisco MA, Sundareswaran KS, Milano CA, Feldman D, Testani JM, Ewald GA, Slaughter MS, Farrar DJ, Goldberg LR; HeartMate II Clinical Investigators. Incidence, risk, and consequences of atrial arrhythmias in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. J Card Surg. 2014 Jul;29(4):572-80. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12336. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
PubMed 24750460Russell SD, Rogers JG, Milano CA, Dyke DB, Pagani FD, Aranda JM, Klodell CT Jr, Boyle AJ, John R, Chen L, Massey HT, Farrar DJ, Conte JV; HeartMate II Clinical Investigators. Renal and hepatic function improve in advanced heart failure patients during continuous-flow support with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device. Circulation. 2009 Dec 8;120(23):2352-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.814863. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
PubMed 19933938Pagani FD, Miller LW, Russell SD, Aaronson KD, John R, Boyle AJ, Conte JV, Bogaev RC, MacGillivray TE, Naka Y, Mancini D, Massey HT, Chen L, Klodell CT, Aranda JM, Moazami N, Ewald GA, Farrar DJ, Frazier OH; HeartMate II Investigators. Extended mechanical circulatory support with a continuous-flow rotary left ventricular assist device. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jul 21;54(4):312-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.055.
PubMed 19608028
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jun 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The HeartMate II LVAS Pivotal Study Protocol, Bridge to Cardiac Transplantation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00121472
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TC010230-1
- Keywords
- Heart-assist devices
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 194 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical DevicesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Thoratec Corporation
- Study start
- Mar 2005
- Primary completion
- Nov 2006 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jul 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 Mar 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of the Thoratec HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System (LVAS) as a bridge to cardiac transplantation in end-stage heart failure patients who are listed for cardiac transplant but are at imminent risk of dying.
The HeartMate II LVAS was approved by the US FDA on April 21, 2008, as a bridge to cardiac transplantation (reference PMA P060040). It was approved for commercial distribution in Canada on May 20, 2009 (reference Medical Device Licence #79765). Patients enrolled into the clinical trial will continue to be followed until all have reached a clinical outcome.
Detailed description
The HeartMate II is a high speed, electric, axial flow, rotary blood pump. The pump drains blood from the left ventricular apex via a rigid inlet cannula and ejects into the aortic root via an outflow cannula joined to the aorta with an end to side anastomosis. Power and control of the pump are delivered through a percutaneous cable from the pump to the belt-worn System Driver. Patient outcomes will be compared to objective performance criteria based on historical data from other Thoratec implantable ventricular assist devices.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- The following are general criteria; more specific conditions are included in the study protocol:
- Listed for cardiac transplantation
- NYHA Class IV heart failure symptoms
- On inotropic support, if tolerated
- Despite medical therapy, the patient must meet hemodynamic criteria for cardiogenic shock
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- The following are general criteria; more specific conditions are included in the study protocol:
- Evidence of, or risk factors for end-organ dysfunction that would make LVAS implantation futile
- Existence of factors that would adversely affect patient survival or function of the LVAS.
- Intolerance to anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapies.
- Existence of any ongoing mechanical circulatory support other than intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Thoratec HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System (LVAS)Also: Thoratec, HeartMate II, Ventricular assistImplantation of ventricular assist device to provide hemodynamic support | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Survival
Time frame: 180 days
Survival to cardiac transplantation or 180 days on left ventricular assist system (LVAS) support while remaining listed for cardiac transplantation as United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS)status 1A or 1B (please refer to www.unos.org for complete definitions of status).
7 secondary outcomes
Clinical Reliability (Malfunctions/Failures)
Time frame: continuous
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionaire (KCCQ)
Time frame: baseline to 6 months
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification
Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHF)
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Time frame: baseline to 6 months
Reoperations
Time frame: continuous
Post-transplant Survival
Time frame: 30 days, 1 year
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jun 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 17761592Miller LW, Pagani FD, Russell SD, John R, Boyle AJ, Aaronson KD, Conte JV, Naka Y, Mancini D, Delgado RM, MacGillivray TE, Farrar DJ, Frazier OH; HeartMate II Clinical Investigators. Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 30;357(9):885-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067758.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24750460Brisco MA, Sundareswaran KS, Milano CA, Feldman D, Testani JM, Ewald GA, Slaughter MS, Farrar DJ, Goldberg LR; HeartMate II Clinical Investigators. Incidence, risk, and consequences of atrial arrhythmias in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. J Card Surg. 2014 Jul;29(4):572-80. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12336. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 19933938Russell SD, Rogers JG, Milano CA, Dyke DB, Pagani FD, Aranda JM, Klodell CT Jr, Boyle AJ, John R, Chen L, Massey HT, Farrar DJ, Conte JV; HeartMate II Clinical Investigators. Renal and hepatic function improve in advanced heart failure patients during continuous-flow support with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device. Circulation. 2009 Dec 8;120(23):2352-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.814863. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 19608028Pagani FD, Miller LW, Russell SD, Aaronson KD, John R, Boyle AJ, Conte JV, Bogaev RC, MacGillivray TE, Naka Y, Mancini D, Massey HT, Chen L, Klodell CT, Aranda JM, Moazami N, Ewald GA, Farrar DJ, Frazier OH; HeartMate II Investigators. Extended mechanical circulatory support with a continuous-flow rotary left ventricular assist device. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jul 21;54(4):312-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.055.
Related trials for Heart Failure, Congestive
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Multi-Scale Analysis of Phenotypes in Heart Failure (MAP-HEART)
Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 3
Optimal Diuretic Therapies for Acute Heart Failure With Volume Overload
Acute Heart Failure
Recruiting
Renal Denervation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Hypertension
Atrial Fibrillation (Paroxysmal), Hypertension
RecruitingObservational study
Changes in Skeletal Muscle Thickness in Patients With Acute Heart Failure
Heart Failure, Muscle Atrophy
Recruiting
PRECISE-AFMR I: Transcatheter Mitral Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair for Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation in Patients at High Surgical Risk
Atrial Functional, Mitral Regurgitation (MR)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pooja Chatterjee study director
Thoratec Corporation
36 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Thoratec HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System (LVAS) in people with Heart Failure, Congestive and Ventricular Dysfunction, run by Abbott Medical Devices at 36 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 36 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Mar 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Survival (time frame: 180 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00121472, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jun 2022.