Type I HypersensitivityPhase 2NCT00118625
Assessment of the Contribution of Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPL) to a Tree Pollen Allergy Vaccine
A Phase 2 study testing Tree MATA MPL in people with Type I Hypersensitivity, run by Allergy Therapeutics at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT), the administration of gradually increasing quantities of an allergen extract to an allergic patient, is a curative approach which directly treats the underlying allergic disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type I Hypersensitivity
- What is being tested?
- Tree MATA MPL
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Jul 2005to Sep 2005
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Positive skin prick test for birch and hazel and alder allergen
- Positive skin prick test to positive histamine control
- Negative skin prick test to negative control
- Specific IgE for birch as documented by a radioallergosorbent or equivalent test with class ≥ 2
- History of at least 1 season of moderate to severe seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis due to an IgE - mediated allergy to pollen from birch and hazel and alder
- Patients must score on the disease severity questionnaire as moderate or severe.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Males or non-pregnant, non-lactating females
- Willing and able to attend required study visits
- Able to follow instructions
- Willing and able to give written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Acute or subacute atopic dermatitis and/or urticaria factitia and/or urticaria due to physical or chemical influence and/or chronic dermatitis
- Moderate to severe asthma
- Visual inspection of the forearms indicates potential problems with the conduct or interpretation of the skin prick test; both forearms must be available for testing.
- History or presence of diabetes, cancer or any clinically significant cardiac, metabolic, renal, or hematologic diseases or disorders
- Recent clinically significant history of hepatic, gastrointestinal, dermatologic, venereal, neurologic or psychiatric diseases or disorders
- Any clinically significant abnormal laboratory value at Visit 0
Show all 28Show fewer
- Perennial allergens: clinically relevant sensitivity to house dust mites, molds and epithelia
- Patient has clinically relevant sensitivity to the following summer/autumn season flowering plants: plantain, orache, nettle, mugwort , Bermuda grass, or ragweed.
- Secondary alteration at the affected organ
- History of autoimmune diseases
- Patient is taking ß-blockers for any indication
- Patient who is not allowed to receive adrenalin
- Patients in whom tyrosine metabolism is disturbed
- Presence of a disease with a pathogenesis interfering with the immune response and patient has received medication which could influence the results of this study
- Documented evidence of acute or significant chronic infection
- History of anaphylaxis
- Documented history of angioedema
- Hypersensitivity to the excipients of the study medication
- Previous or current hyposensitization therapy with comparable tree allergen extracts
- Currently using anti-allergy medication and other drugs with antihistaminic activity
- Patients currently participating in a clinical trial or who have been exposed to study medication within the last 30 days
- Patients who cannot communicate reliably with the Investigator or who are not likely to cooperate with the requirements of the study
- Patient is pregnant or planning pregnancy and/or lactating
- Patient has received treatment with preparation containing monophosphoryl lipid A during the past 12 months
- Concurrent use of any prohibited medication(s), as listed in the study protocol.
- Any systemic disorder that could interfere with the evaluation of the study medication(s)
- Clinical history of drug or alcohol abuse, at the Investigator's discretion, that would interfere with the patient's participation in the study
- Study site staff or immediate relatives of study site staff or other individuals who would have access to the clinical study protocol
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Double-Blind Phase IIa Study to Demonstrate the Contribution of MPL® to Tyrosine Adsorbed Birch + Hazel + Alder Pollen Allergoid (Tree MATA) With a Single-Blind Portion to Evaluate the Residual Allergenicity in Skin Test in Volunteers Allergic to Birch and Hazel and Alder Pollen
Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT), the administration of gradually increasing quantities of an allergen extract to an allergic patient, is a curative approach which directly treats the underlying allergic disease. Tree MATA MPL has been developed to provide pre-seasonal specific immunotherapy for patients with an allergy to tree pollen (hay fever).
The tolerability and immunogenicity of Tree MATA (allergen modified with glutaraldehyde and adsorbed to tyrosine) with and without MPL adjuvant (monophosphoryl lipid A, extracted from a bacterial cell surface) is being investigated in this double-blind, randomized Phase IIa study in volunteers allergic to birch and hazel and alder pollen.
Additionally, this study will assess residual allergenicity of the modified birch and hazel and alder pollen in the product Tree MATA MPL using skin prick testing in volunteers allergic to birch and hazel and alder pollen.
Read the detailed description
Allergic rhinitis is a nasal inflammatory disorder initiated by an immunoglobulin-E (IgE) mediated hypersensitivity to allergens. When a patient is exposed to an allergen to which he or she is sensitive, the allergen cross-links with the IgE antibody, which is bound to the surface of tissue mast cells. This cross-linking then triggers the release of proinflammatory substances, such as histamine and eicosanoids, and is known as the early response. In a skin prick test, this reaction produces a wheal-and-flare response. Normally, systemic exposure to an allergen also leads to the more prolonged late reaction, in which eosinophils, basophils, and activated T cells are recruited to the site of exposure. The recruited T cells also secrete inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-5, typically associated with helper T cells type 2 (TH2), which further propagate the inflammatory cascade. Typically, the early response occurs within 15 to 30 minutes (but as quickly as a few seconds) and usually resolves within 1 to 3 hours, and the late response occurs within 6 to 12 hours and resolves in 24 hours.
Allergic vaccination (AV), also referred to as immunotherapy or allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT), is a curative approach that is available for allergic diseases, which directly treats the underlying disease. AV is the practice of administering gradually increasing quantities of an allergen extract to an allergic patient to ameliorate the symptoms associated with the subsequent exposure to the causative allergen. AV is believed to exert its beneficial effects on the immune system, at least in part, by modifying the T-lymphocyte response to subsequent natural allergen exposure. AV has been shown to inhibit both early and late responses to allergen exposure. AV acts on T cells to modify peripheral and mucosal TH2 responses to an allergen in favor of helper T cell type 1 (TH1) responses. One of the hallmarks of successful AV is the redressing of a "healthy" TH1/TH2-balance.
Although efficacious, immunotherapy is generally considered a long-term disease modifying measure that requires months to years of treatment, entails multiple injection regimens and involves some risk for adverse immune reactions.
Allergy Therapeutics (AT) has developed formulations over the years to increase both the safety and efficacy of such treatment. In particular, the allergen extract has been chemically modified with glutaraldehyde and formulated with L-tyrosine to act as a depot adjuvant and provide a slow release of the allergens or modified allergens. This increases the safety profile and enhances the efficacy-associated immunological changes. Efficacy could be further improved by adding the immunological adjuvant monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL).
Tree MATA MPL is designed to provide a vaccine that will be efficacious with only three escalating dose injections, in contrast to the longer schedules currently in use. It is designed to have all of the current advantages of an allergy vaccine, which can modify the underlying disease process, as opposed to pharmacological control, which treats only the symptoms. The vaccine will also be safer to use than a formulation containing a similar mass of unmodified allergen extract due to the propensity of the unmodified allergen extract to cause severe local allergic reactions or anaphylaxis, because of its reduced reactivity with IgE antibody.
The tolerability and immunogenicity of Tree MATA with and without MPL adjuvant is being investigated in this double-blind, randomized Phase IIa study in volunteers allergic to birch and hazel and alder pollen.
Additionally, this study will assess residual allergenicity of the modified birch and hazel and alder pollen in the product Tree MATA MPL using skin prick testing in volunteers allergic to birch and hazel and alder pollen.
- Conditions
- Type I Hypersensitivity
- Being tested
- Tree MATA MPL
- Keywords
- Allergy, Specific Immunotherapy, Adjuvant, Allergy Vaccination, Allergenicity
- Medical subject headings
- Hypersensitivity, Immediate, Hypersensitivity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tree MATA MPLBiological
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
immunological response to Tree MATA MPL versus Tree MATA (birch specific)
Secondary outcomes (10)
immunological response to Tree MATA MPL versus Tree MATA (hazel and alder specific)
allergenicity of the modified tree (birch, alder, hazel) pollen allergoid using skin prick testing
tolerability of native allergen, modified allergen and tyrosine adsorbents +/- MPL in the skin prick tests
tolerability of the different dose steps compared between Tree MATA MPL and Tree MATA treatment groups
the tolerability of the cumulative subcutaneous doses compared between Tree MATA MPL and Tree MATA treatment groups
safety laboratories
vital signs
12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG)
number of adverse events
number of adverse reactions
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jul 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2005
- Study completionSep 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Type I HypersensitivityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Enrolment
- 40 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Allergy Therapeutics
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Deepen Patel, MD, Principal investigator, Allied Research International Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00118625
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TreeMATAMPL202
- Other IDs
- P2DP05002
- Status last verified
- Jun 2010
- First submitted
- 1 Jul 2005
- Last updated
- 17 Jun 2010
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jun 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Double-Blind Phase IIa Study to Demonstrate the Contribution of MPL® to Tyrosine Adsorbed Birch + Hazel + Alder Pollen Allergoid (Tree MATA) With a Single-Blind Portion to Evaluate the Residual Allergenicity in Skin Test in Volunteers Allergic to Birch and Hazel and Alder Pollen
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00118625
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TreeMATAMPL202
- Conditions
- Type I Hypersensitivity
- Keywords
- Allergy, Specific Immunotherapy, Adjuvant, Allergy Vaccination, Allergenicity
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Allergy TherapeuticsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2005
- Study completion
- Sep 2005
- First posted
- 12 Jul 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT), the administration of gradually increasing quantities of an allergen extract to an allergic patient, is a curative approach which directly treats the underlying allergic disease. Tree MATA MPL has been developed to provide pre-seasonal specific immunotherapy for patients with an allergy to tree pollen (hay fever).
The tolerability and immunogenicity of Tree MATA (allergen modified with glutaraldehyde and adsorbed to tyrosine) with and without MPL adjuvant (monophosphoryl lipid A, extracted from a bacterial cell surface) is being investigated in this double-blind, randomized Phase IIa study in volunteers allergic to birch and hazel and alder pollen.
Additionally, this study will assess residual allergenicity of the modified birch and hazel and alder pollen in the product Tree MATA MPL using skin prick testing in volunteers allergic to birch and hazel and alder pollen.
Detailed description
Allergic rhinitis is a nasal inflammatory disorder initiated by an immunoglobulin-E (IgE) mediated hypersensitivity to allergens. When a patient is exposed to an allergen to which he or she is sensitive, the allergen cross-links with the IgE antibody, which is bound to the surface of tissue mast cells. This cross-linking then triggers the release of proinflammatory substances, such as histamine and eicosanoids, and is known as the early response. In a skin prick test, this reaction produces a wheal-and-flare response. Normally, systemic exposure to an allergen also leads to the more prolonged late reaction, in which eosinophils, basophils, and activated T cells are recruited to the site of exposure. The recruited T cells also secrete inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-5, typically associated with helper T cells type 2 (TH2), which further propagate the inflammatory cascade. Typically, the early response occurs within 15 to 30 minutes (but as quickly as a few seconds) and usually resolves within 1 to 3 hours, and the late response occurs within 6 to 12 hours and resolves in 24 hours.
Allergic vaccination (AV), also referred to as immunotherapy or allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT), is a curative approach that is available for allergic diseases, which directly treats the underlying disease. AV is the practice of administering gradually increasing quantities of an allergen extract to an allergic patient to ameliorate the symptoms associated with the subsequent exposure to the causative allergen. AV is believed to exert its beneficial effects on the immune system, at least in part, by modifying the T-lymphocyte response to subsequent natural allergen exposure. AV has been shown to inhibit both early and late responses to allergen exposure. AV acts on T cells to modify peripheral and mucosal TH2 responses to an allergen in favor of helper T cell type 1 (TH1) responses. One of the hallmarks of successful AV is the redressing of a "healthy" TH1/TH2-balance.
Although efficacious, immunotherapy is generally considered a long-term disease modifying measure that requires months to years of treatment, entails multiple injection regimens and involves some risk for adverse immune reactions.
Allergy Therapeutics (AT) has developed formulations over the years to increase both the safety and efficacy of such treatment. In particular, the allergen extract has been chemically modified with glutaraldehyde and formulated with L-tyrosine to act as a depot adjuvant and provide a slow release of the allergens or modified allergens. This increases the safety profile and enhances the efficacy-associated immunological changes. Efficacy could be further improved by adding the immunological adjuvant monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL).
Tree MATA MPL is designed to provide a vaccine that will be efficacious with only three escalating dose injections, in contrast to the longer schedules currently in use. It is designed to have all of the current advantages of an allergy vaccine, which can modify the underlying disease process, as opposed to pharmacological control, which treats only the symptoms. The vaccine will also be safer to use than a formulation containing a similar mass of unmodified allergen extract due to the propensity of the unmodified allergen extract to cause severe local allergic reactions or anaphylaxis, because of its reduced reactivity with IgE antibody.
The tolerability and immunogenicity of Tree MATA with and without MPL adjuvant is being investigated in this double-blind, randomized Phase IIa study in volunteers allergic to birch and hazel and alder pollen.
Additionally, this study will assess residual allergenicity of the modified birch and hazel and alder pollen in the product Tree MATA MPL using skin prick testing in volunteers allergic to birch and hazel and alder pollen.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Positive skin prick test for birch and hazel and alder allergen
- Positive skin prick test to positive histamine control
- Negative skin prick test to negative control
- Specific IgE for birch as documented by a radioallergosorbent or equivalent test with class ≥ 2
- History of at least 1 season of moderate to severe seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis due to an IgE - mediated allergy to pollen from birch and hazel and alder
Key exclusion criteria (28 listed)
- Acute or subacute atopic dermatitis and/or urticaria factitia and/or urticaria due to physical or chemical influence and/or chronic dermatitis
- Moderate to severe asthma
- Visual inspection of the forearms indicates potential problems with the conduct or interpretation of the skin prick test; both forearms must be available for testing.
- History or presence of diabetes, cancer or any clinically significant cardiac, metabolic, renal, or hematologic diseases or disorders
- Recent clinically significant history of hepatic, gastrointestinal, dermatologic, venereal, neurologic or psychiatric diseases or disorders
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tree MATA MPL | Biological | – |
Primary outcome
immunological response to Tree MATA MPL versus Tree MATA (birch specific)
10 secondary outcomes
immunological response to Tree MATA MPL versus Tree MATA (hazel and alder specific)
allergenicity of the modified tree (birch, alder, hazel) pollen allergoid using skin prick testing
tolerability of native allergen, modified allergen and tyrosine adsorbents +/- MPL in the skin prick tests
tolerability of the different dose steps compared between Tree MATA MPL and Tree MATA treatment groups
the tolerability of the cumulative subcutaneous doses compared between Tree MATA MPL and Tree MATA treatment groups
safety laboratories
vital signs
12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG)
number of adverse events
number of adverse reactions
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jun 2010.
Related trials for Type I Hypersensitivity
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Rinatabart Sesutecan (Rina-S, PRO1184, GEN1184) for Advanced Solid Tumors (GCT1184-01/ PRO1184-001)
High Grade Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Novel Biomarkers of Non-IgE Immediate Hypersensitivity Drug Reactions
Healthy Volunteer, Hypersensitivity Reactions
Active, not recruiting
The COCCOS Study: a Transition Program for Young Persons With Chronic Conditions
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Obesity
RecruitingObservational study
Impaired Type I IFN Immunity Due to Autoantibodies or a Genetic Defect: a Prospective National Cohort
Immunology, Allergy
RecruitingPhase 3
STOP-HAE: A Phase 3 Study of ADX-324 in HAE
Hereditary Angioedema, HAE
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Deepen Patel, MD principal investigator
Allied Research International Inc.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Tree MATA MPL in people with Type I Hypersensitivity, run by Allergy Therapeutics at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 28 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jun 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
immunological response to Tree MATA MPL versus Tree MATA (birch specific). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jun 2010.