AzTrials
AzTrials

Renal TransplantationPhase 3BENEFIT-EXTNCT00114777

Study of Belatacept in Subjects Who Are Undergoing a Renal Transplant

A Phase 3 study testing Cyclosporin A, Belatacept Less Intensive Regimen (LI) and Belatacept More Intensive Regimen (MI) in people with Renal Transplantation, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 79 sites in 19 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this trial is to learn if Belatacept is effective and safe as a first line of immunosuppression treatment in patients undergoing a renal transplant where the donor kidney is obtained in patients with extended criteria. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Renal Transplantation
What is being tested?
Cyclosporin A, Belatacept Less Intensive Regimen (LI) and Belatacept More Intensive Regimen (MI)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
595 participants
Where
79 sitesin 19 countries
Study dates
Feb 2005to Sep 2014
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject is a first-time recipient of a kidney transplant from a deceased donor.
  • Specific donor criteria

Who cannot join

  • Donor age <10 years
  • Subjects receiving a concurrent solid organ or cell transplant (lung, heart, etc.)
  • Subjects with a positive T-cell lymphocytotoxic crossmatch.
  • Subjects who are positive for Hepatitis B or C, or HIV
  • Active tuberculosis
  • History of cancer in the last 5 years
Show all 11Show fewer
  • History of substance abuse
  • Specific laboratory results are exclusionary
  • Mammography suspicious for cancer
  • Allergy to iodine
  • For Long-term extension study-Subjects who have completed three years of study treatment (through Week 156)

Trial locations and contacts

79 sites in 19 countries.

79 sites in 19 countries

United States28 sites
  • Piedmont Transplant Institute

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30309

  • Emory University Hospital

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • University Of Colorado Health Sciences Center

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • University Of Alabama At Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

  • Carolinas Medical Center

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203

  • Northwestern University-Feinberg School Of Medicine

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • University Of Chicago Hospitals

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

  • Baylor University Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75246

  • Henry Ford Hospital, Transplant Institute

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202

  • Ucla Kidney & Kidney-Pancreas Transplant Research Office

    Los Angeles, California, 90024

  • National Institute Of Transplantation

    Los Angeles, California, 90057

  • University Of Wisconsin

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792

  • Froedtert Memorial Hospital

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226

  • University Of Minnesota

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455

  • Yale University School Of Medicine

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06540

  • Acadiana Renal Physicians

    New Iberia, Louisiana, 70563

  • Tulane Abdominal Transplant Institute

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112

  • Mount Sinai School Of Medicine

    New York, New York, 10029

  • Columbia University College Of Physicians & Surgeons

    New York, New York, 10032

  • Drexel University College Of Medicine, Department Of Surgery

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102

  • University Of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • Sharp Memorial Hospital

    San Diego, California, 92133

  • University Of California San Francisco Medical Center

    San Francisco, California, 94143

  • Western New England Renal & Transplant Associates, Pc

    Springfield, Massachusetts, 01107

  • Washington University School Of Medicine

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Lifelink Healthcare Institute

    Tampa, Florida, 33606

Other trials in United States

France9 sites
  • Local Institution

    Bordeaux, 33076

  • Local Institution

    Brest, 29609

  • Local Institution

    Créteil, 94000

  • Local Institution

    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275

  • Local Institution

    Nantes, 44093

  • Local Institution

    Paris, 75015

  • Local Institution

    Toulouse, 31054

  • Local Institution

    Tours, 37044

  • Local Institution

    Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511

Other trials in France

Brazil6 sites
  • Local Institution

    Campinas/sp, São Paulo, 13083

  • Local Institution

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035

  • Local Institution

    Porto Alegre/rs, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035

  • Local Institution

    Rio de Janeiro, 21041

  • Local Institution

    São Paulo, 05403

  • Local Institution

    São Paulo, 4038-002

Other trials in Brazil

Argentina5 sites
  • Local Institution

    Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, 1425

  • Local Institution

    Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, C1155APP

  • Local Institution

    Cordoba, Crd, Córdoba Province, X5016KEH

  • Local Institution

    Rosario, Santa Fe Province, 2000

  • Local Institution

    Santa Fe, S3000EPV

Other trials in Argentina

Germany5 sites
  • Local Institution

    Berlin, 10117

  • Local Institution

    Berlin, 13353

  • Local Institution

    Erlangen, 91054

  • Local Institution

    Essen, 45147

  • Local Institution

    Hanover, 30625

Other trials in Germany

Spain5 sites
  • Local Institution

    Barcelona, 08036

  • Local Institution

    Barcelona, 08907

  • Local Institution

    Madrid, 28040

  • Local Institution

    Madrid, 28041

  • Local Institution

    Málaga, 29010

Other trials in Spain

Canada4 sites
  • Local Institution

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2S2

  • Local Institution

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7

  • Local Institution

    Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1

  • Local Institution

    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7M 0Z9

Other trials in Canada

Italy3 sites
  • Local Institution

    Milan, 20162

  • Local Institution

    Padova, 35128

  • Local Institution

    Roma, 00168

Other trials in Italy

Austria2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Innsbuck, 6020

  • Local Institution

    Vienna, 1090

Other trials in Austria

Hungary2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Budapest, 1082

  • Local Institution

    Szeged, H-6720

Other trials in Hungary

Poland2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Poznan, 60-479

  • Local Institution

    Warsaw, 02-006

Other trials in Poland

Australia1 site
  • Local Institution

    Woodville, South Australia, 5011

Other trials in Australia

Belgium1 site
  • Local Institution

    Leuven, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

Chile1 site
  • Local Institution

    Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan

Other trials in Chile

Czechia1 site
  • Local Institution

    Prague, 140 21

Other trials in Czechia

Norway1 site
  • Local Institution

    Oslo, N-0027

Other trials in Norway

South Africa1 site
  • Local Institution

    Pretoria, Gauteng, 0181

Other trials in South Africa

Sweden1 site
  • Local Institution

    Gothenburg, 413 45

Other trials in Sweden

United Kingdom1 site
  • Local Institution

    Manchester, M13 9WL

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First-line Immunosuppression Trial - Extended Criteria Donors (BENEFIT-EXT)

The purpose of this trial is to learn if Belatacept is effective and safe as a first line of immunosuppression treatment in patients undergoing a renal transplant where the donor kidney is obtained in patients with extended criteria.

Being tested
Cyclosporin A, Belatacept Less Intensive Regimen (LI), Belatacept More Intensive Regimen (MI)

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cyclosporin ADrug

    Also called CsA

    tablet, oral, 1st month target: 150-300 ng/mL, after 1st month target: 100-250 ng/mL, daily, 36 months, 100-250 ng/mL, daily, 84 months

  • Belatacept Less Intensive Regimen (LI)Drug

    solution, IV, 10mg/kg: Days 1 and 5, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12, then 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 36 months months, 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 84 months

  • Belatacept More Intensive Regimen (MI)Drug

    solution, IV, 10mg/kg: Days 1 and 5, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10,12, 16, 20, and 24, then 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 36 months, 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 84 months

Study groups in NCT00114777
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cyclosporin AActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Cyclosporin A
Belatacept Less Intensive Regimen (LI)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Belatacept Less Intensive Regimen (LI)
Belatacept More Intensive Regimen (MI)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Belatacept More Intensive Regimen (MI)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Survived With a Graft at 12 Months Post-Transplant

    Participant and graft survival at 12 months was summarized within each treatment group. Graft loss was defined as either functional loss or physical loss (nephrectomy). Functional loss was defined as a sustained level of serum creatinine ≥ 6.0 mg/dL (530 μmol/L) as determined by central laboratory for ≥4 weeks or 56 or more consecutive days of dialysis.

    Measured: Month 12 post-transplant

  2. Percentage of Participants With a Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) <60 mL/Min Per 1.73 m^2 at Month 12 or a Decrease in Measured GFR >=10 mL/Min Per 1.73 m^2 From Month 3 to Month 12

    GFR was assessed using a true measure of glomerular filtration via non-radiolabeled iothalamate clearance test using a validated procedure.

    Measured: From Month 3 to Month 12

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) by Month 12 and 24

    GFR was assessed using a true measure of glomerular filtration via nonradiolabeled iothalamate clearance test using a validated procedure. Missing measured GFR assessments were imputed. Here, 'n' signifies the number of evaluable participants for the reporting arm at the given time point. Missing measured GFR assessments were imputed to a GFR of zero.

    Measured: At Month 12 and Month 24

  2. Percentage of Participants With Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (CAN) at Month 12

    Biopsy-proven CAN was determined by a blinded central histopathologist using the Banff 97 working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Onset of CAN was determined by the biopsy date when it was observed. Participants were considered as having CAN at 12 months if: CAN observed in a biopsy either prior to 12 months (including baseline biopsy) or first post 12 months biopsy; Participant had graft loss during the first year post transplant; no biopsy available post 12 months and CAN not observed in biopsies prior to 12 months; no biopsy available either prior to or post 12 months; and the measured glomerular filtration rate from Month 3 to Month 12 decreases at least 10 mL/min/1.73m^2. All other participants with missing 12 month biopsy were considered having no CAN observed at 12 months.

    Measured: At Month 12

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Survived With a Graft at 24 and 36 Months Post-Transplant

    Participant and graft survival at 12 months was summarized within each treatment group. Graft loss was defined as either functional loss or physical loss (nephrectomy). Functional loss will be defined as a sustained level of serum creatinine ≥ 6.0 mg/dL (530 μmol/L) as determined by central laboratory for ≥ 4 weeks or 56 or more consecutive days of dialysis.

    Measured: Month 24 and Month 36 post-transplant

  4. Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 84 Months

    GFR was assessed using a true measure of glomerular filtration via nonradiolabeled iothalamate clearance test using a validated procedure. Missing measured GFR assessments were imputed. Here 'n' signifies those participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm, respectively.

    Measured: Months 6, 12, 24, 36 and 84

  5. Change in Calculated GFR at Months 12, 24, 36 and 84

    GFR was assessed using a true measure of glomerular filtration via nonradiolabeled iothalamate clearance test using a validated procedure. Missing measured GFR assessments were imputed. Here 'n' signifies those participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm, respectively.

    Measured: Baseline and Months 12, 24, 36 and 84

  6. Number of Participants With Anti-Hypertensive Medications Used to Control Hypertension at 12, 24 and 36 Months

    Participants were determined to have hypertension at a particular time point if standardized systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mm Hg or standardized diastolic blood pressure ≥ 80 mm Hg or participant had received an antihypertensive medication(s) for hypertension. Here 'n' signifies those participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm, respectively.

    Measured: Baseline and Months 12, 24 and 36

  7. Percentage of Subjects Who Used Anti-Hypertensive Medications to Control Hypertension at Months 12, 24 and 36

    Participants were determined to have hypertension at a particular time point if standardized systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mm Hg or standardized diastolic blood pressure ≥ 80 mm Hg or subject had received an anti-hypertensive medication(s) for hypertension. Here 'n' signifies those participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm, respectively.

    Measured: Months 12, 24 and 36

  8. Percentage of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus (NODM) at 12, 24 and 36 Months.

    NODM was defined as participant who did not have diabetes prior to randomization. Participants were determined for NODM if the participant received an antidiabetic medication for a duration of at least 30 days, or at least two fasting plasma glucose (FPG) tests indicate that FPG is ≥ 126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L).

    Measured: Months 12, 24 and 36

  9. Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) at 12, 24 and 36 Months

    Participants were determined to have hypertension at a particular time point if standardized systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mm Hg or standardized diastolic blood pressure ≥ 80 mm Hg or participant had received an anti-hypertensive medication(s) for hypertension. Here 'n' signifies those participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm, respectively.

    Measured: Months 12, 24 and 36

  10. Mean Framingham Risk Score From Baseline to Months 12, 24 and 36

    The risk score was calculated based on the total points from six variables: Age, Level of LDL-cholesterol, Level of HDL-cholesterol, Presence and severity of systolic or diastolic hypertension, Presence or absence of a history of diabetes mellitus and Presence or absence of a history recent cigarette smoking. Total scores can range from <-3 to >14, which translate to a 1% to 56% risk of developing coronary heart disease in 10 years. Totals in the 4 to 6 point range translate to a 7 to 11% risk and 8 to 10 point range translate to a 18 to 27% risk.

    Measured: Baseline and Months 12, 24 and 36

  11. Percentage of Participants Using Lipid-Lowering Therapy at 12, 24, and 36 Months

    Dyslipidemia was defined as triglyceride ≥ 500 mg/dL [5.65 mmol/L], low density lipoprotein (LDL) ≥ 100 mg/dL [2.59 mmol/L], and non-elevated high density lipoprotein (HDL) ≥ 130 mg/dL [3.36 mmol/L]. Here 'n' signifies those participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm, respectively.

    Measured: Months 12, 24 and 36

  12. Change in Total Cholesterol (TC), Non-HDL, LDL and HDL Cholesterol and Triglycerides at 12, 24 and 36

    Dyslipidemia was defined as triglyceride ≥ 500 mg/dL [5.65 mmol/L], low density lipoprotein (LDL) ≥ 100 mg/dL [2.59 mmol/L], and elevated non-high density lipoprotein (HDL) ≥ 130 mg/dL [3.36 mmol/L]. Here 'n' signifies those participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm, respectively.

    Measured: Months 12, 24 and 36

  13. Percentage of Participants Who Have an Acute Rejection by Months 6, 12, 24, 36 and 84

    Acute rejection was defined as central biopsy proven rejection that was either clinically suspected by protocol defined reasons or clinically suspected by other reasons and treated. Clinically suspected acute rejection was defined as an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine or an unexplained decreased urine output or fever and graft tenderness or serum creatinine that remains elevated within 14 days post--transplantation and clinical suspicion of acute rejection exists.

    Measured: Months 6, 12, 24, 36 and 84

  14. Number of Participants Using Lymphocyte Depleting Therapy and Steroid-Resistant for Acute Rejection by Months 6, 12, 24, and 36.

    Acute rejection was defined as central biopsy proven rejection that was either clinically suspected by protocol defined reasons or clinically suspected by other reasons and treated. Lymphocyte -depletion therapy for treatment of an episode of acute was defined as a participant treated with therapy and provided not treated with steroids earlier while steroid resistant acute rejection was defined as participants initially treated with steroids alone for suspected acute rejection for at least 2 days and then followed by the start of lymphocyte -depletion therapy.

    Measured: Months 6, 12, 24 and 36

  15. Number of Participants Based on Severity of Acute Rejection Based on Banff Grade Level by Months 6, 12, 24, 36 and 84

    Acute rejection was defined as central biopsy proven rejection that was either clinically suspected by protocol defined reasons or clinically suspected by other reasons and treated. Clinically suspected acute rejection was defined as an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine or an unexplained decreased urine output or fever and graft tenderness or serum creatinine that remains elevated within 14 days post--transplantation and clinical suspicion of acute rejection exists.

    Measured: Months 6, 12, 24, 36 and 84

  16. Mean Changes in Mental Component and Physical Component Health-Related Quality of Life (SF-36) From Baseline to Months 12, 24 and 36

    The SF-36 is a 36-item self-administered questionnaire developed to assess health-related quality of life (QOL) and comprises 8 domains, including 4 physical (physical health, bodily pain, physical functioning and physical role limitations) and 4 mental (mental health, vitality, social functioning, and emotional role limitation) subscales. Responses are used to derive physical and mental component summary scores, ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better QOL (0=Poorest Health; 100=Best Health). Mean change from baseline = post-baseline value - baseline value; a higher value signifies improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Months 12, 24 and 36

  17. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs up to 36 Months

    Participants with abnormal blood pressure, body weight and body temperature outside the defined normal range were graded as clinically significant vital signs by the investigator.

    Measured: Day 1 to Month 36

  18. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities up to 36 Months

    Participants with laboratory values outside the defined normal range were graded as clinically significant laboratory abnormalities by the investigator. Subjects were analyzed for Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate aminotransferase(AST), Hemoglobin, Platelet Count, Leukocytes, Bilirubin, Creatinine, Calcium, Bicarbonate, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus, Albumin, Uric Acid and Protein. Laboratory abnormalities were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3. Here 'n' signifies those subjects evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm, respectively.

    Measured: Day 1 to Month 36

  19. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Related AEs and SAEs, AEs Leading to Discontinuation and Who Died up to Month 36

    AEs are defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom, sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), syndrome or disease which either occurs during study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require (or prolong) hospitalization, cause persistent or significant disability/incapacity, result in congenital anomalies or birth defects, or are other conditions which in judgment of investigators represent significant hazards.

    Measured: Day 1 to Month 36

  20. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Related AEs and SAEs, AEs Leading to Discontinuation and Who Died up to Month 84

    AEs are defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom, sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), syndrome or disease which either occurs during study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require (or prolong) hospitalization, cause persistent or significant disability/incapacity, result in congenital anomalies or birth defects, or are other conditions which in judgment of investigators represent significant hazards.

    Measured: Day 1 to Month 84

  21. Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or Death to Month 84

    Participant and graft survival at 84 months was summarized within each treatment group.

    Measured: Randomization to date of death, up to 84 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jun 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2005
  3. Primary completionMay 2008
  4. Study completionSep 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
595 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00114777
Sponsor's protocol ID
IM103-027
Acronym
BENEFIT-EXT
Status last verified
Jun 2017
First submitted
17 Jun 2005
Last updated
7 Jul 2017
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Dobbels F, Wong S, Min Y, Sam J, Kalsekar A. Beneficial effect of belatacept on health-related quality of life and perceived side effects: results from the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT trials. Transplantation. 2014 Nov 15;98(9):960-8. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000159.

    PubMed 24831918
  • Pestana JO, Grinyo JM, Vanrenterghem Y, Becker T, Campistol JM, Florman S, Garcia VD, Kamar N, Lang P, Manfro RC, Massari P, Rial MD, Schnitzler MA, Vitko S, Duan T, Block A, Harler MB, Durrbach A. Three-year outcomes from BENEFIT-EXT: a phase III study of belatacept versus cyclosporine in recipients of extended criteria donor kidneys. Am J Transplant. 2012 Mar;12(3):630-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03914.x. Epub 2012 Feb 2.

    PubMed 22300431

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Cyclosporin A, Belatacept Less Intensive Regimen (LI) and Belatacept More Intensive Regimen (MI) in people with Renal Transplantation, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 79 sites in 19 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 79 sites in United States, France, Brazil, Argentina, Germany and 14 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Jul 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Survived With a Graft at 12 Months Post-Transplant (time frame: Month 12 post-transplant). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00114777, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in