Colorectal CancerPhase 3NCT00113763
Evaluating Panitumumab (ABX-EGF) Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing Panitumumab in people with Colorectal Cancer and Metastases, run by Amgen.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine that panitumumab, using the proposed regimen, will safely increase progression free survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have failed available treatment options (i.e., patients who developed progressive disease or relapsed while on or after prior… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer, Metastases
- What is being tested?
- Panitumumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 463 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2004to 1 Jun 2009
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Pathologic diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma (diagnostic tissue obtained by tissue biopsy)
- Metastatic colorectal carcinoma
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2
- Documented evidence of disease progression during, or following treatment, with fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
- Radiographic documentation of disease progression during or within 6 months following the most recent chemotherapy regimen
- Unidimensionally measurable disease
Show all 9Show fewer
- Tumor expressing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) by immunohistochemistry
- At least 2 but not more than 3 prior chemotherapy regimens for colorectal cancer
- Adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic function
Who cannot join
- Symptomatic brain metastases requiring treatment
- History or evidence of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis
- Use of systemic chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 30 days prior to enrollment
- Prior epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) targeting therapies
- Prior anti-tumor therapies including prior experimental agents or approved anti-tumor small molecules and biologics of short (less than a week) serum half life within 30 days before enrollment, or prior experimental or approved proteins within 3 months before enrollment.
About this study
Official title: An Open-label, Randomized, Phase 3 Clinical Trial of ABX-EGF Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
The purpose of this study is to determine that panitumumab, using the proposed regimen, will safely increase progression free survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have failed available treatment options (i.e., patients who developed progressive disease or relapsed while on or after prior fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin chemotherapy).
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer, Metastases
- Being tested
- Best supportive care, Panitumumab
- Keywords
- Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, Colon, Colorectal, Rectal Cancer, Cancer, Metastatic, EGFr, Clinical Trial, Panitumumab, ABX-EGF, Immunex, Abgenix, Amgen
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis, Rectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Best supportive careOther
Best supportive care as site routine excluding: antineoplastic chemotherapy, investigational agents, anti-EGFr(Epidermal growth factor receptor) targeting agents other than ABX-EGF(Panitumumab), experimental or approved anti-tumor therapies (e.g. Avastin), chemotherapy, radiotherapy (with the exception of radiotherapy for pain control limited to bone metastases).
PanitumumabDrug
Also called ABX-EGF
Intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Panitumumab plus best supportive care | Experimental | Panitumumab will be administered by intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until participants develop progressive disease or are unable to tolerate study drug. Participants will also receive best supportive care (BSC) as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines. Receives: Drug: Panitumumab |
| Best Supportive Care | Other | Best supportive care will be defined in this study as the best care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines and will include antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated. For the purpose of this study, best supportive care will not include anti-neoplastic chemotherapy. Receives: Other: Best supportive care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-free Survival Time
Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to either death or first observed disease progression, whichever occurred first. Participants were evaluated for tumor response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) based on the response assessment from a blinded review of radiographic scans by the Independent Review Committee. Progressive disease defined as least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SLD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions, or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Measured: From randomization to the data cut-off date of 30 June 2005. The median follow-up time was 20.0 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 18.2 weeks in the BSC alone group.
Secondary outcomes (7)
Overall Survival
Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to death.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date for overall survival of 15 March 2006. The median actual follow-up time was 30 weeks for the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31 weeks for the BSC alone group.
Objective Tumor Response
Defined as the number of participants with a confirmed complete or partial tumor response, confirmed by a scan no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Participants were evaluated for tumor response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) based on the response assessment from a blinded review of radiographic scans by the Independent Review Committee. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Partial Response (PR): disappearance of all target lesions, and persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) not qualifying for either CR or progressive disease, or, at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD, with no progressive disease of non-target lesions.
Measured: From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.
Duration of Response
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from first confirmed objective tumor response to first observed progression of disease or death due to progression of disease (whichever comes first).
Measured: From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.
Time to Response
Time to response was defined as the time from randomization to first partial or complete response, subsequently confirmed ≥ 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met.
Measured: From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.
Time to Disease Progression
Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to disease progression or death due to disease progression (whichever occurs first)
Measured: From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.
Time to Treatment Failure
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from randomization to the date the decision was made to end treatment for any reason.
Measured: From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.
Duration of Stable Disease
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from randomization to date of first observed progression of disease or death due to progression of disease (whichever comes first) for those participants with a best response of stable disease. Stable disease defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for a partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease taking as reference the nadir longest diameter since the treatment started, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no new lesions.
Measured: From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jun 2005 (estimated)
- Study start1 Jan 2004
- Primary completion1 Oct 2008
- Study completion1 Jun 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AmgenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 463 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Amgen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MD, Study director, Amgen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00113763
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20020408
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 10 Jun 2005
- Last updated
- 7 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Bai JP, Bell R, Buckman S, Burckart GJ, Eichler HG, Fang KC, Goodsaid FM, Jusko WJ, Lesko LL, Meibohm B, Patterson SD, Puig O, Smerage JB, Snider BJ, Wagner JA, Wang J, Walton MK, Weiner R. Translational biomarkers: from preclinical to clinical a report of 2009 AAPS/ACCP Biomarker Workshop. AAPS J. 2011 Jun;13(2):274-83. doi: 10.1208/s12248-011-9265-x. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
PubMed 21448748Odom D, Barber B, Bennett L, Peeters M, Zhao Z, Kaye J, Wolf M, Wiezorek J. Health-related quality of life and colorectal cancer-specific symptoms in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic disease treated with panitumumab. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Feb;26(2):173-81. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-1112-5. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
PubMed 21190026Peeters M, Siena S, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, Hendlisz A, Cascinu S, Kalofonos H, Devercelli G, Wolf M, Amado RG. Association of progression-free survival, overall survival, and patient-reported outcomes by skin toxicity and KRAS status in patients receiving panitumumab monotherapy. Cancer. 2009 Apr 1;115(7):1544-54. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24088.
PubMed 19189371Siena S, Peeters M, Van Cutsem E, Humblet Y, Conte P, Bajetta E, Comandini D, Bodoky G, Van Hazel G, Salek T, Wolf M, Devercelli G, Woolley M, Amado RG. Association of progression-free survival with patient-reported outcomes and survival: results from a randomised phase 3 trial of panitumumab. Br J Cancer. 2007 Dec 3;97(11):1469-74. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604053. Epub 2007 Nov 27.
PubMed 18040272Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S, Humblet Y, Hendlisz A, Neyns B, Canon JL, Van Laethem JL, Maurel J, Richardson G, Wolf M, Amado RG. Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 1;25(13):1658-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.1620.
PubMed 17470858Safari M, Esmaeili H, Mahjub H, Roshanaei G. Estimation of treatment effect in presence of noncompliance and competing risks: a simulation study. Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 18;13(1):13477. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40538-2.
PubMed 37596461Liao MZ, Prenen H, Dutta S, Upreti VV. The impact of hepatic and renal function on panitumumab exposures in patients with metastatic RAS wild-type colorectal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2021 Oct;88(4):665-672. doi: 10.1007/s00280-021-04319-w. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
PubMed 34213592Boeckx N, Koukakis R, Op de Beeck K, Rolfo C, Van Camp G, Siena S, Tabernero J, Douillard JY, Andre T, Peeters M. Effect of Primary Tumor Location on Second- or Later-line Treatment Outcomes in Patients With RAS Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and All Treatment Lines in Patients With RAS Mutations in Four Randomized Panitumumab Studies. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Sep;17(3):170-178.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
PubMed 29627309Peeters M, Kafatos G, Taylor A, Gastanaga VM, Oliner KS, Hechmati G, Terwey JH, van Krieken JH. Prevalence of RAS mutations and individual variation patterns among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A pooled analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Sep;51(13):1704-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.017. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
PubMed 26049686Poulin-Costello M, Azoulay L, Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S, Wolf M. An analysis of the treatment effect of panitumumab on overall survival from a phase 3, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial (20020408) in patients with chemotherapy refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Target Oncol. 2013 Jun;8(2):127-36. doi: 10.1007/s11523-013-0271-z. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
PubMed 23625191Amado RG, Wolf M, Peeters M, Van Cutsem E, Siena S, Freeman DJ, Juan T, Sikorski R, Suggs S, Radinsky R, Patterson SD, Chang DD. Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1626-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.7116. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
PubMed 18316791
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-label, Randomized, Phase 3 Clinical Trial of ABX-EGF Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00113763
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 20020408
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer, Metastases
- Keywords
- Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, Colon, Colorectal, Rectal Cancer, Cancer, Metastatic, EGFr, Clinical Trial, Panitumumab, ABX-EGF, Immunex, Abgenix, Amgen
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 463 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AmgenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2004 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Jun 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 3 Jan 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine that panitumumab, using the proposed regimen, will safely increase progression free survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have failed available treatment options (i.e., patients who developed progressive disease or relapsed while on or after prior fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin chemotherapy).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Panitumumab plus best supportive care | Experimental | Drug: PanitumumabPanitumumab will be administered by intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until participants develop progressive disease or are unable to tolerate study drug. Participants will also receive best supportive care (BSC) as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines. |
| Best Supportive Care | Other | Other: Best supportive careBest supportive care will be defined in this study as the best care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines and will include antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated. For the purpose of this study, best supportive care will not include anti-neoplastic chemotherapy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Pathologic diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma (diagnostic tissue obtained by tissue biopsy)
- Metastatic colorectal carcinoma
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2
- Documented evidence of disease progression during, or following treatment, with fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
- Radiographic documentation of disease progression during or within 6 months following the most recent chemotherapy regimen
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Symptomatic brain metastases requiring treatment
- History or evidence of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis
- Use of systemic chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 30 days prior to enrollment
- Prior epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) targeting therapies
- Prior anti-tumor therapies including prior experimental agents or approved anti-tumor small molecules and biologics of short (less than a week) serum half life within 30 days before enrollment, or prior experimental or approved proteins within 3 months before enrollment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Best supportive careBest supportive care as site routine excluding: antineoplastic chemotherapy, investigational agents, anti-EGFr(Epidermal growth factor receptor) targeting agents other than ABX-EGF(Panitumumab), experimental or approved anti-tumor therapies (e.g. Avastin), chemotherapy, radiotherapy (with the exception of radiotherapy for pain control limited to bone metastases). | Other | Best Supportive Care |
| PanitumumabAlso: ABX-EGFIntravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks. | Drug | Panitumumab plus best supportive care |
Primary outcome
Progression-free Survival Time
Time frame: From randomization to the data cut-off date of 30 June 2005. The median follow-up time was 20.0 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 18.2 weeks in the BSC alone group.
Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to either death or first observed disease progression, whichever occurred first. Participants were evaluated for tumor response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) based on the response assessment from a blinded review of radiographic scans by the Independent Review Committee. Progressive disease defined as least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SLD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions, or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
7 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date for overall survival of 15 March 2006. The median actual follow-up time was 30 weeks for the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31 weeks for the BSC alone group.
Objective Tumor Response
Time frame: From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.
Duration of Response
Time frame: From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.
Time to Response
Time frame: From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.
Time to Disease Progression
Time frame: From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.
Time to Treatment Failure
Time frame: From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.
Duration of Stable Disease
Time frame: From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Nov 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 21448748Bai JP, Bell R, Buckman S, Burckart GJ, Eichler HG, Fang KC, Goodsaid FM, Jusko WJ, Lesko LL, Meibohm B, Patterson SD, Puig O, Smerage JB, Snider BJ, Wagner JA, Wang J, Walton MK, Weiner R. Translational biomarkers: from preclinical to clinical a report of 2009 AAPS/ACCP Biomarker Workshop. AAPS J. 2011 Jun;13(2):274-83. doi: 10.1208/s12248-011-9265-x. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
- Background: PubMed 21190026Odom D, Barber B, Bennett L, Peeters M, Zhao Z, Kaye J, Wolf M, Wiezorek J. Health-related quality of life and colorectal cancer-specific symptoms in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic disease treated with panitumumab. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Feb;26(2):173-81. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-1112-5. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
- Background: PubMed 19189371Peeters M, Siena S, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, Hendlisz A, Cascinu S, Kalofonos H, Devercelli G, Wolf M, Amado RG. Association of progression-free survival, overall survival, and patient-reported outcomes by skin toxicity and KRAS status in patients receiving panitumumab monotherapy. Cancer. 2009 Apr 1;115(7):1544-54. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24088.
- Background: PubMed 18040272Siena S, Peeters M, Van Cutsem E, Humblet Y, Conte P, Bajetta E, Comandini D, Bodoky G, Van Hazel G, Salek T, Wolf M, Devercelli G, Woolley M, Amado RG. Association of progression-free survival with patient-reported outcomes and survival: results from a randomised phase 3 trial of panitumumab. Br J Cancer. 2007 Dec 3;97(11):1469-74. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604053. Epub 2007 Nov 27.
- Background: PubMed 17470858Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S, Humblet Y, Hendlisz A, Neyns B, Canon JL, Van Laethem JL, Maurel J, Richardson G, Wolf M, Amado RG. Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 1;25(13):1658-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.1620.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37596461Safari M, Esmaeili H, Mahjub H, Roshanaei G. Estimation of treatment effect in presence of noncompliance and competing risks: a simulation study. Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 18;13(1):13477. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40538-2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34213592Liao MZ, Prenen H, Dutta S, Upreti VV. The impact of hepatic and renal function on panitumumab exposures in patients with metastatic RAS wild-type colorectal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2021 Oct;88(4):665-672. doi: 10.1007/s00280-021-04319-w. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29627309Boeckx N, Koukakis R, Op de Beeck K, Rolfo C, Van Camp G, Siena S, Tabernero J, Douillard JY, Andre T, Peeters M. Effect of Primary Tumor Location on Second- or Later-line Treatment Outcomes in Patients With RAS Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and All Treatment Lines in Patients With RAS Mutations in Four Randomized Panitumumab Studies. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Sep;17(3):170-178.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26049686Peeters M, Kafatos G, Taylor A, Gastanaga VM, Oliner KS, Hechmati G, Terwey JH, van Krieken JH. Prevalence of RAS mutations and individual variation patterns among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A pooled analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Sep;51(13):1704-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.017. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23625191Poulin-Costello M, Azoulay L, Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S, Wolf M. An analysis of the treatment effect of panitumumab on overall survival from a phase 3, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial (20020408) in patients with chemotherapy refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Target Oncol. 2013 Jun;8(2):127-36. doi: 10.1007/s11523-013-0271-z. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 18316791Amado RG, Wolf M, Peeters M, Van Cutsem E, Siena S, Freeman DJ, Juan T, Sikorski R, Suggs S, Radinsky R, Patterson SD, Chang DD. Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1626-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.7116. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
- AmgenTrials clinical trials websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- FDA-approved Drug LabelingLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MD study director
Amgen
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Panitumumab in people with Colorectal Cancer and Metastases, run by Amgen.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Jan 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-free Survival Time (time frame: From randomization to the data cut-off date of 30 June 2005. The median follow-up time was 20.0 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 18.2 weeks in the BSC alone group.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00113763, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2022.