LeukemiaPhase 3NCT00112554
Cytarabine With or Without VNP40101M in Treating Patients With Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
A Phase 3 study testing cytarabine and laromustine in people with Leukemia, run by Vion Pharmaceuticals at 62 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cytarabine and VNP40101M, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more cancer cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- cytarabine and laromustine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 420 participants
- Where
- 62 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 2005to Mar 2008
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically confirmed acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
- Any WHO classification, excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia
- At least 10% blasts by bone marrow aspirate and/or biopsy
- In first relapse after achieving a first complete response (CR) OR CR (with platelet count < 100,000/mm³ but ≥ 20,000/mm³ [transfusion independent for ≥ 7 consecutive days]) (CRp) that lasted ≥ 3 months but ≤ 24 months after completion of the initial induction regimen
- Relapse confirmed by recurrence of blasts in peripheral blood, bone marrow histopathology, and/or histologically confirmed CNS or extramedullary disease
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age
- 18 and over
Performance status
- ECOG 0-2
Life expectancy
- Not specified
Hematopoietic
- See Disease Characteristics
Hepatic
- Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
- AST ≤ 3 times ULN
- Chronic hepatitis allowed
Renal
- Creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dL
Cardiovascular
- No myocardial infarction within the past 3 months
- No uncontrolled arrhythmias
- No uncontrolled congestive heart failure
Pulmonary
- No severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- No requirement for supplemental oxygen at rest
Immunologic
- No uncontrolled active infection
- Infections that are controlled and under active treatment with antibiotics allowed
- No evidence of invasive fungal infection by blood or tissue cultures
Other
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for 3 months after completion of study treatment
- No clinical evidence of another active malignancy by tumor marker, pathology, or radiologic studies
- No other severe medical condition that would preclude study treatment
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
- Not specified
Chemotherapy
- At least 12 hours since prior hydroxyurea
Endocrine therapy
- Not specified
Radiotherapy
- Not specified
Surgery
- Not specified
Other
- No prior treatment while in first relapse except hydroxyurea
- No other concurrent standard or investigational treatment for AML
- No concurrent disulfiram (Antabuse®)
Trial locations and contacts
62 sites in 10 countries.
62 sites in 10 countries
United States24 sites
New Mexico Cancer Care Alliance
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106
Greenebaum Cancer Center at University of Maryland Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center at Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263-0001
Hollings Cancer Center at Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center at Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611-3013
University of Chicago Cancer Research Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637-1470
Riverside Methodist Hospital Cancer Care
Columbus, Ohio, 43214-3998
Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University
Greenville, North Carolina, 27858
Saint Francis/Mount Sinai Regional Cancer Center at Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center
Hartford, Connecticut, 06105
Penn State Cancer Institute at Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033-0850
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at University of Texas
Houston, Texas, 77030-4009
American Health Network - North Meridian
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260
Nevada Cancer Institute
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89135
USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Hospital
Los Angeles, California, 90089-9181
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1781
University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center
Miami, Florida, 33136
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-6838
Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of California Irvine Medical Center
Orange, California, 92868
Western Pennsylvania Cancer Institute at Western Pennsylvania Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224
UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center
San Francisco, California, 94115
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Tampa (Haley)
Tampa, Florida, 33612
New York Medical College
Valhalla, New York, 10595
Germany7 sites
Charite - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin - Campus Benjamin Franklin
Berlin, D-12200
Medizinische Universitaetsklinik I at the University of Cologne
Cologne, D-50924
Universitaetsfrauenklinik Frankfurt
Frankfurt, D-60596
Universitatsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, D-69115
Klinikum der Universitaet Muenchen - Grosshadern Campus
Munich, D-81377
Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik A - Universitaetsklinikum Muenster
Münster, D-48149
University Wurzburg
Würzburg, D-97070
Canada6 sites
Capital District Health Authority Center for Clinical Research
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7
Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Centre - General Campus
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
Saint John Regional Hospital
Saint John, New Brunswick, E2L 4L2
Memorial University of Newfoundland
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1B 3V6
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
Vancouver Hospital and Health Science Center
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E3
United Kingdom6 sites
Birmingham Heartlands Hospital
Birmingham, England, B9 5SS
Addenbrooke's Hospital at Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Cambridge, England, CB2 2QQ
University Hospital of Wales
Cardiff, Wales, CF14 4XW
Leicester Royal Infirmary
Leicester, England, LE1 5WW
King's College Hospital
London, England, SE5 9RS
Manchester Royal Infirmary
Manchester, England, M13 9WL
France5 sites
Centre Hospitalier Regional de Besancon - Hopital Jean Minjoz
Besançon, 25030
Hopital Edouard Herriot
Lyon, 69437
Marseille Institute of Cancer - Institut J. Paoli and I. Calmettes
Marseille, 13273
CHR Hotel Dieu
Nantes, 44093
Hopital Haut Leveque
Pessac, 33604
Poland5 sites
Medical University of Gdansk
Gdansk, 80-211
Medical University of Lodz
Lodz, 90-419
Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiez
Lublin, 20-954
Wojskowy Instytut Medyczny
Warsaw, 00-909
Institute of Haematology and Blood Transfusion
Warsaw, 00-957
Belgium3 sites
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Brussels, 1200
U.Z. Gasthuisberg
Leuven, B-3000
CHU Charleroi - Site Vesale
Montigny-le-Tilleul, 6110
Serbia3 sites
Clinical Centre of Serbia
Belgrade, 11000
Clinical Centre Nis
Niš, 18000
Clinic Centre Novi Sad
Novi Sad, 21000
Greece2 sites
Evaggelismos Hospital
Athens, 10676
University of Patras Medical School
Rio Patras, GR-26500
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Randomized of Cloretazine™ (VNP40101M) and Cytosine Arabinoside (AraC) in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Relapse
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cytarabine and VNP40101M, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more cancer cells.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying cytarabine and VNP40101M to see how well they work compared to cytarabine alone in treating patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the complete response (CR) and CR (with platelet count < 100,000/mm^3 but ≥ 20,000/mm^3 [transfusion independent for ≥ 7 consecutive days]) (CRp) rates in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse treated with cytarabine with vs without VNP40101M.
Secondary
- Compare time to progression in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare duration of response in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to age (< 60 years vs ≥ 60 years) and duration of first complete response (CR) or CR (with platelet count < 100,000/mm³ but ≥ 20,000/mm³ [transfusion independent for ≥ 7 consecutive days]) (CRp) (< 12 months vs ≥ 12 months).
- Induction therapy: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive cytarabine IV continuously on days 1-3 and VNP40101M IV over 30-60 minutes on day 2 (at least 12 hours after the start of cytarabine).
- Arm II: Patients receive cytarabine as in arm I and placebo IV over 30-60 minutes on day 2 (at least 12 hours after the start of cytarabine).
In both arms, patients demonstrating at least 20% reduction of blasts in bone marrow (based on total cellularity and percent blasts) after course 1 may receive 1 additional course of induction therapy between days 35-60 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients achieving CR or CRp after 1 or 2 courses of induction therapy proceed to consolidation therapy.
- Consolidation therapy: Beginning 6 weeks after initial documentation of CR or CRp, patients receive 1 course of consolidation therapy, as per induction therapy, according to their randomized treatment arm. These patients may then proceed to other consolidation, maintenance, and/or intensification therapy (including stem cell transplantation) off study at the discretion of the physician.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed monthly for 6 months, every 2 months for 6 months, and then every 3 months for 2 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 420 patients (280 in arm I and 140 in arm II) will be accrued for this study within 24-30 months.
- Conditions
- Leukemia
- Being tested
- cytarabine, laromustine, placebo
- Keywords
- adult acute myeloid leukemia with 11q23 (MLL) abnormalities, adult acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16)(p13;q22), adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(16;16)(p13;q22), adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22), recurrent adult acute myeloid leukemia, adult acute basophilic leukemia, adult acute eosinophilic leukemia, adult erythroleukemia (M6a), adult pure erythroid leukemia (M6b), adult acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (M7), adult acute minimally differentiated myeloid leukemia (M0), adult acute monoblastic leukemia (M5a), adult acute monocytic leukemia (M5b), adult acute myeloblastic leukemia with maturation (M2), adult acute myeloblastic leukemia without maturation (M1), adult acute myelomonocytic leukemia (M4)
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Congenital Abnormalities, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Leukemia, Basophilic, Acute, Leukemia, Eosinophilic, Acute, Leukemia, Erythroblastic, Acute, Leukemia, Megakaryoblastic, Acute, Leukemia, Monocytic, Acute
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cytarabineDrug
Given IV
laromustineDrug
Given IV
placeboOther
Given IV
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Induction therapy arm I | Experimental | Patients receive cytarabine IV continuously on days 1-3 and VNP40101M IV over 30-60 minutes on day 2 (at least 12 hours after the start of cytarabine). Receives: Drug: cytarabine; Drug: laromustine |
| Induction therapy arm II | Active comparator | Patients receive cytarabine as in arm I and placebo IV over 30-60 minutes on day 2 (at least 12 hours after the start of cytarabine). Receives: Drug: cytarabine; Other: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall response rate
Secondary outcomes (4)
Time to tumor progression
Duration of response
Overall response
Toxicity
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jun 2005 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2005
- Primary completionMar 2008
- Study completionMar 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- Double blind
- Enrolment
- 420 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vion Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Bonny L. Johnson, RN, MSN, Vion Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00112554
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000430677
- Other IDs
- VION-CLI-037
- Status last verified
- Feb 2009
- First submitted
- 2 Jun 2005
- Last updated
- 6 Nov 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Giles F, Vey N, DeAngelo D, Seiter K, Stock W, Stuart R, Boskovic D, Pigneux A, Tallman M, Brandwein J, Kell J, Robak T, Staib P, Thomas X, Cahill A, Albitar M, O'Brien S. Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of high-dose continuous infusion cytarabine alone or with laromustine (VNP40101M) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse. Blood. 2009 Nov 5;114(19):4027-33. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-06-229351. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
PubMed 19710500Giles FJ, Stock W, Vey N, et al.: A double blind placebo-controlled randomized phase III study of high dose continuous infusion cytosine arabinoside (araC) with or without cloretazine in patients with first relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). [Abstract] Blood 108 (11): A-1970, 2006.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Nov 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Randomized of Cloretazine™ (VNP40101M) and Cytosine Arabinoside (AraC) in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Relapse
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00112554
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000430677
- Conditions
- Leukemia
- Keywords
- adult acute myeloid leukemia with 11q23 (MLL) abnormalities, adult acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16)(p13;q22), adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(16;16)(p13;q22), adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22), recurrent adult acute myeloid leukemia, adult acute basophilic leukemia, adult acute eosinophilic leukemia, adult erythroleukemia (M6a)
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 420 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Vion PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2005
- Primary completion
- Mar 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Jun 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cytarabine and VNP40101M, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more cancer cells.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying cytarabine and VNP40101M to see how well they work compared to cytarabine alone in treating patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the complete response (CR) and CR (with platelet count < 100,000/mm^3 but ≥ 20,000/mm^3 [transfusion independent for ≥ 7 consecutive days]) (CRp) rates in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse treated with cytarabine with vs without VNP40101M.
Secondary
- Compare time to progression in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare duration of response in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to age (< 60 years vs ≥ 60 years) and duration of first complete response (CR) or CR (with platelet count < 100,000/mm³ but ≥ 20,000/mm³ [transfusion independent for ≥ 7 consecutive days]) (CRp) (< 12 months vs ≥ 12 months).
- Induction therapy: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive cytarabine IV continuously on days 1-3 and VNP40101M IV over 30-60 minutes on day 2 (at least 12 hours after the start of cytarabine).
- Arm II: Patients receive cytarabine as in arm I and placebo IV over 30-60 minutes on day 2 (at least 12 hours after the start of cytarabine).
In both arms, patients demonstrating at least 20% reduction of blasts in bone marrow (based on total cellularity and percent blasts) after course 1 may receive 1 additional course of induction therapy between days 35-60 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients achieving CR or CRp after 1 or 2 courses of induction therapy proceed to consolidation therapy.
- Consolidation therapy: Beginning 6 weeks after initial documentation of CR or CRp, patients receive 1 course of consolidation therapy, as per induction therapy, according to their randomized treatment arm. These patients may then proceed to other consolidation, maintenance, and/or intensification therapy (including stem cell transplantation) off study at the discretion of the physician.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed monthly for 6 months, every 2 months for 6 months, and then every 3 months for 2 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 420 patients (280 in arm I and 140 in arm II) will be accrued for this study within 24-30 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- Double blind
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Induction therapy arm I | Experimental | Drug: cytarabine, Drug: laromustinePatients receive cytarabine IV continuously on days 1-3 and VNP40101M IV over 30-60 minutes on day 2 (at least 12 hours after the start of cytarabine). |
| Induction therapy arm II | Active comparator | Drug: cytarabine, Other: placeboPatients receive cytarabine as in arm I and placebo IV over 30-60 minutes on day 2 (at least 12 hours after the start of cytarabine). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cytarabineGiven IV | Drug | Induction therapy arm I, Induction therapy arm II |
| laromustineGiven IV | Drug | Induction therapy arm I |
| placeboGiven IV | Other | Induction therapy arm II |
Primary outcome
Overall response rate
4 secondary outcomes
Time to tumor progression
Duration of response
Overall response
Toxicity
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Nov 2013.
- Results publication: PubMed 19710500Giles F, Vey N, DeAngelo D, Seiter K, Stock W, Stuart R, Boskovic D, Pigneux A, Tallman M, Brandwein J, Kell J, Robak T, Staib P, Thomas X, Cahill A, Albitar M, O'Brien S. Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of high-dose continuous infusion cytarabine alone or with laromustine (VNP40101M) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse. Blood. 2009 Nov 5;114(19):4027-33. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-06-229351. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
- Results publicationGiles FJ, Stock W, Vey N, et al.: A double blind placebo-controlled randomized phase III study of high dose continuous infusion cytosine arabinoside (araC) with or without cloretazine in patients with first relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). [Abstract] Blood 108 (11): A-1970, 2006.
Related trials for Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 1
Vididencel in CML-CP Patients With MRD
CML (Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bonny L. Johnson, RN, MSN
Vion Pharmaceuticals
62 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing cytarabine and laromustine in people with Leukemia, run by Vion Pharmaceuticals at 62 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Nov 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 62 sites in United States, Germany, Canada, United Kingdom, France and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall response rate. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00112554, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Nov 2013.