Type I HypersensitivityPhase 1NCT00107705
Assessment of Residual Allergenicity of Tree (Birch, Hazel, and Alder) Pollen Allergoid Using Skin Prick Testing
A Phase 1 study testing Tree MATA MPL in people with Type I Hypersensitivity, run by Allergy Therapeutics at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the residual allergenicity of Tree MATA (modified pollen allergen tyrosine adsorbate) by skin prick testing. This is done by a comparison of the wheal response after skin prick testing with aqueous native and modified allergen, modified tyrosine adsorbed allergen and Tree MATA… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type I Hypersensitivity
- What is being tested?
- Tree MATA MPL
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Apr 2005to May 2005
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- The subject must sign the study consent form prior to any screening procedures being performed.
- If the volunteer is female of childbearing potential, she must demonstrate a negative urine pregnancy test and agree to remain abstinent or use an effective method of birth control or use a hormonal contraceptive
- The subject must demonstrate a positive skin prick test to Birch, Hazel and Alder pollen allergen extract
- The subject must demonstrate a positive skin prick test to positive histamine control
- The subject must demonstrate a negative skin prick test to negative control
- The subject must demonstrate a specific IgE for Birch, Hazel and Alder as documented by a RAST (radioallergosorbent test), or equivalent test
- The subject must have clinically acceptable results from the screening procedure.
Who cannot join
- History or presence of acute or subacute atopic dermatitis, chronic dermatitis, urticaria factitia, or urticaria due to physical/chemical influence or any other skin conditions which might interfere with the interpretation of skin prick test results
- Visual inspection of the forearms indicates potential problems with the conduct or interpretation of the skin prick tests; both forearms must be available for testing
- Subject has asthma or other lower respiratory tract condition
- History or presence of diabetes, cancer or any clinically significant cardiac, metabolic, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, dermatologic, venereal, hematologic, neurologic or psychiatric diseases or disorders
- Any clinically significant abnormal laboratory value at Visit 1
- Clinically relevant sensitivity to any common perennial allergen: house dust mites, molds, epithelia (cat, dog, and horse), grass mix
Show all 26Show fewer
- Clinically relevant symptoms due to an IgE - mediated allergy at screening and before inclusion to the treatment period.
- Secondary alteration at the affected organ.
- History of auto-immune diseases or rheumatoid diseases
- Subject has a medical condition that prohibits the use of adrenalin
- Subject has disorder of tyrosine metabolism
- Subject with diseases interfering with the immune response and have received medication, which could influence the results of this study
- Subject has acute or chronic infection
- History of anaphylaxis
- History of angioedema
- Subjects determined by the Investigator to have any medical condition that could jeopardize their health or prejudice the results
- History of hypersensitivity to the excipients of the study medication
- History of immunotherapy with tree allergen extracts
- Current therapy with ß-blockers
- Currently receiving anti-allergy medication or other drugs with antihistaminic activity
- Subject has a positive drugs of abuse screen at Visit 1
- Subject participated in a clinical trial with an investigational drug within the last 30 days
- Subject cannot communicate reliably with the Investigator or is deemed uncooperative or noncompliant
- Females who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or refuse to use a reliable method of birth control
- Subject received treatment with a preparation containing MPL during the past 12 months
- Use of prohibited medications or inadequate washout periods prior to screening
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Single-blind Phase I Study to Assess the Residual Allergenicity of Tree (Birch, Hazel and Alder) Pollen Allergoid Using Skin Prick Testing
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the residual allergenicity of Tree MATA (modified pollen allergen tyrosine adsorbate) by skin prick testing. This is done by a comparison of the wheal response after skin prick testing with aqueous native and modified allergen, modified tyrosine adsorbed allergen and Tree MATA MPL (modified tyrosine adsorbed + MPL [Monophosphoryl Lipid A]).
Read the detailed description
Tree MATA MPL has been developed to provide pre-seasonal specific immunotherapy for patients with proven type I hypersensitivity to cross reacting tree pollens. MPL (Monophosphoryl Lipid A), a purified, detoxified glycolipid derived from the cell wall of Salmonella minnesota, is included in the product formulation as an adjuvant to increase the immunogenic effect of the product and to enhance the switch from an allergen-specific TH2 to a TH1-like profile.
The tree pollen extract is modified with glutaraldehyde to produce the active ingredient, an allergoid. This modification reduces the reactivity of the extract with IgE antibody, thus reducing the risk of side effects. However, a simultaneous reduction in other important immunological properties, such as IgG and T cell reactivities is not seen.
The purpose of this study is to assess residual allergenicity of the modified tree pollen in Tree MATA MPL using skin prick testing.
- Conditions
- Type I Hypersensitivity
- Being tested
- Tree MATA MPL
- Keywords
- allergy, skin prick test, allergoid, allergenicity, specific immunotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Hypersensitivity, Immediate, Hypersensitivity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tree MATA MPLBiological
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
to assess the allergenicity of the modified tree (birch, alder, hazel) pollen allergoid using skin prick testing
Secondary outcomes (1)
evaluation for potential late phase reactions; adverse events; clinical labs; vital signs
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Apr 2005 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2005
- Study completionMay 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Type I HypersensitivityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind
- Enrolment
- 12 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Allergy Therapeutics
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Karl Jürgen Fischer von Weikersthal-Drachenberg, MD, Study chair, Allergy Therapeutics
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00107705
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TreeMATAMPL101
- Other IDs
- P1DP05001
- Status last verified
- Jun 2010
- First submitted
- 7 Apr 2005
- Last updated
- 17 Jun 2010
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jun 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Single-blind Phase I Study to Assess the Residual Allergenicity of Tree (Birch, Hazel and Alder) Pollen Allergoid Using Skin Prick Testing
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00107705
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TreeMATAMPL101
- Conditions
- Type I Hypersensitivity
- Keywords
- allergy, skin prick test, allergoid, allergenicity, specific immunotherapy
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 12 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Allergy TherapeuticsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2005
- Study completion
- May 2005
- First posted
- 8 Apr 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the residual allergenicity of Tree MATA (modified pollen allergen tyrosine adsorbate) by skin prick testing. This is done by a comparison of the wheal response after skin prick testing with aqueous native and modified allergen, modified tyrosine adsorbed allergen and Tree MATA MPL (modified tyrosine adsorbed + MPL [Monophosphoryl Lipid A]).
Detailed description
Tree MATA MPL has been developed to provide pre-seasonal specific immunotherapy for patients with proven type I hypersensitivity to cross reacting tree pollens. MPL (Monophosphoryl Lipid A), a purified, detoxified glycolipid derived from the cell wall of Salmonella minnesota, is included in the product formulation as an adjuvant to increase the immunogenic effect of the product and to enhance the switch from an allergen-specific TH2 to a TH1-like profile.
The tree pollen extract is modified with glutaraldehyde to produce the active ingredient, an allergoid. This modification reduces the reactivity of the extract with IgE antibody, thus reducing the risk of side effects. However, a simultaneous reduction in other important immunological properties, such as IgG and T cell reactivities is not seen.
The purpose of this study is to assess residual allergenicity of the modified tree pollen in Tree MATA MPL using skin prick testing.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- The subject must sign the study consent form prior to any screening procedures being performed.
- If the volunteer is female of childbearing potential, she must demonstrate a negative urine pregnancy test and agree to remain abstinent or use an effective method of birth control or use a hormonal contraceptive
- The subject must demonstrate a positive skin prick test to Birch, Hazel and Alder pollen allergen extract
- The subject must demonstrate a positive skin prick test to positive histamine control
- The subject must demonstrate a negative skin prick test to negative control
Key exclusion criteria (26 listed)
- History or presence of acute or subacute atopic dermatitis, chronic dermatitis, urticaria factitia, or urticaria due to physical/chemical influence or any other skin conditions which might interfere with the interpretation of skin prick test results
- Visual inspection of the forearms indicates potential problems with the conduct or interpretation of the skin prick tests; both forearms must be available for testing
- Subject has asthma or other lower respiratory tract condition
- History or presence of diabetes, cancer or any clinically significant cardiac, metabolic, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, dermatologic, venereal, hematologic, neurologic or psychiatric diseases or disorders
- Any clinically significant abnormal laboratory value at Visit 1
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tree MATA MPL | Biological | – |
Primary outcome
to assess the allergenicity of the modified tree (birch, alder, hazel) pollen allergoid using skin prick testing
1 secondary outcome
evaluation for potential late phase reactions; adverse events; clinical labs; vital signs
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jun 2010.
Related trials for Type I Hypersensitivity
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Rinatabart Sesutecan (Rina-S, PRO1184, GEN1184) for Advanced Solid Tumors (GCT1184-01/ PRO1184-001)
High Grade Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Novel Biomarkers of Non-IgE Immediate Hypersensitivity Drug Reactions
Healthy Volunteer, Hypersensitivity Reactions
Active, not recruiting
The COCCOS Study: a Transition Program for Young Persons With Chronic Conditions
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Obesity
RecruitingObservational study
Impaired Type I IFN Immunity Due to Autoantibodies or a Genetic Defect: a Prospective National Cohort
Immunology, Allergy
RecruitingPhase 3
STOP-HAE: A Phase 3 Study of ADX-324 in HAE
Hereditary Angioedema, HAE
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Karl Jürgen Fischer von Weikersthal-Drachenberg, MD study chair
Allergy Therapeutics
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Tree MATA MPL in people with Type I Hypersensitivity, run by Allergy Therapeutics at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 26 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jun 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
to assess the allergenicity of the modified tree (birch, alder, hazel) pollen allergoid using skin prick testing. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jun 2010.