Hepatitis C, ChronicPhase 4NCT00107653
Latino Study - A Study of PEGASYS (Peginterferon Alfa-2a (40KD)) and COPEGUS (Ribavirin) in Treatment-Naive Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C-Genotype 1.
A Phase 4 study testing Ribavirin and Peginterferon alfa-2a in people with Hepatitis C, Chronic, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 60 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This single arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of PEGASYS (180 micrograms sc weekly) plus ribavirin (1000-1200mg po daily) in treatment-naive Latino patients versus non-Latino Caucasian patients with chronic hepatitis C- genotype 1. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatitis C, Chronic
- What is being tested?
- Ribavirin and Peginterferon alfa-2a
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 569 participants
- Where
- 60 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Oct 2004to Sep 2007
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adult patients 18-65 years of age
- chronic hepatitis C , genotype 1
- serologic evidence of CHC infection by an antibody test
- chronic liver disease, consistent with CHC infection on a liver biopsy obtained within the past 18 months
- compensated liver disease
- use of 2 forms of contraception during the study in both men and women
Who cannot join
- previous interferon or ribavirin therapy
- systemic antiviral therapy less than 24 weeks before first dose of study drug or expected need for this treatment any time during the study
- medical condition associated with chronic liver disease (eg, hemochromatosis, autoimmune hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, toxin exposure)
- decompensated liver disease
- women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
Trial locations and contacts
60 sites in 2 countries.
60 sites in 2 countries
United States58 sites
Study site
Anaheim, California, 92801
Study site
Austell, Georgia, 30106
Study site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205
Study site
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70890
Study site
Bayside, New York, 11358
Study site
Boca Raton, Florida, 33428
Study site
Bradenton, Florida, 34209
Study site
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7584
Study site
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Study site
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Study site
Dallas, Texas, 75203
Study site
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031
Study site
Fayetteville, North Carolina, 28304
Study site
Fort Sam Houston, Texas, 78234-3879
Study site
Fort Worth, Texas, 76107
Study site
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
Study site
Framingham, Massachusetts, 01702
Study site
Fresno, California, 93721
Study site
Galveston, Texas, 77555
Study site
Gurnee, Illinois, 60031
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77030
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77090
Study site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Study site
Lancaster, California, 93534
Study site
Los Angeles, California, 90022
Study site
Los Angeles, California, 90033
Study site
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Study site
Miami, Florida, 33125
Study site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37211
Study site
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115
Study site
New York, New York, 10029
Study site
North Miami Beach, Florida, 33162
Study site
Palo Alto, California, 94304-1509
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19141
Study site
Plantation, Florida, 33324
Study site
Pueblo, Colorado, 81008
Study site
Redlands, California, 92373
Study site
Rochester, New York, 14618
Study site
Sacramento, California, 95817
Study site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84121
Study site
San Antonio, Texas, 78215
Study site
San Antonio, Texas, 78258
Study site
San Bernardino, California, 92404
Study site
San Diego, California, 92103-8465
Study site
San Diego, California, 92123
Study site
San Diego, California, 92154
Study site
San Diego, California, 92161
Study site
San Francisco, California, 94110
Study site
San Luis Obispo, California, 93401
Study site
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259
Study site
Seattle, Washington, 98133
Study site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Study site
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Study site
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
Study site
Ventura, California, 93003
Study site
Vineland, New Jersey, 08360
Study site
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label, Comparative, Efficacy Study of Pegasys® Plus Copegus® in Treatment-naïve Latino Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C-genotype 1, as Compared to Treatment-naïve Non- Latino Caucasian Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C-genotype 1
This single arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of PEGASYS (180 micrograms sc weekly) plus ribavirin (1000-1200mg po daily) in treatment-naive Latino patients versus non-Latino Caucasian patients with chronic hepatitis C- genotype 1. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months and the target sample size is 500+ patients.
- Conditions
- Hepatitis C, Chronic
- Being tested
- Ribavirin, Peginterferon alfa-2a
- Medical subject headings
- Hepatitis C, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RibavirinDrug
1000-1200mg po daily for 48 weeks
Peginterferon alfa-2aDrug
180 micrograms sc/week for 48 weeks
RibavirinDrug
1000-1200mg po daily for 48 weeks
Peginterferon alfa-2aDrug
180 micrograms sc/week for 48 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Latino | Experimental | Participants received peginterferon alfa-2a 180 microgram (mcg)/0.5 mL by subcutaneous injection once a week in combination with ribavirin 1000 or 1200 mg per day, which was taken orally in split doses for 48 weeks. Participants with <75 kg (165 lbs) of body weight received 1000 mg/day (400 mg in the morning and 600 mg in the evening). Participants with >=75 kg (165 lbs) of body weight received 1200 mg/day (600 mg in the morning and 600 mg in the evening). Receives: Drug: Ribavirin; Drug: Peginterferon alfa-2a |
| Non-Latino White | Experimental | Participants received peginterferon alfa-2a 180 mcg/0.5 mL by subcutaneous injection once a week in combination with ribavirin 1000 or 1200 mg per day which was taken orally in split doses. Participants with <75 kg (165 lbs) of body weight received 1000 mg/day. Participants with >=75 kg (165 lbs) of body weight received 1200 mg/day for 48 weeks. Receives: Drug: Ribavirin; Drug: Peginterferon alfa-2a |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Week 72
Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) is defined as percentage of participants with an undetectable hepatitis C virus-RNA (HCV-RNA) measurement (<28 International Unit (IU)/millilitre (mL)) assessed 24 weeks post-treatment (week 72) which was assessed by Roche High Pure System/COBAS TaqMan HCV Test.
Measured: At Week 72
Secondary outcomes (20)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Virologic Response
Percentage of participants achieving a virologic response defined as an undetectable HCV-RNA measurement (HCV-RNA <28 IU/mL by Roche High Pure System/COBAS TaqMan HCV Test)
Measured: At Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 60, and 72
Percentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response at Week 4
Percentage of participants with an early virologic response defined as an HCVRNA >=1 log10 drop from baseline or undetectable HCV-RNA measurement at Week 4 (lower limit of detection 28 IU/mL).
Measured: At Week 4
Percentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response at Week 12
Percentage of participants with an early virologic response defined as an HCV-RNA >=2 log10 drop from baseline or undetectable HCV-RNA measurement at Week 12 (lower limit of detection 28 IU/mL).
Measured: At Week 12
Change From Baseline in HCV-RNA Log10 Titers Over the Period Of Time
The table below shows HCV-RNA log10 titers change from baseline values by study week and by study group. Analysis was performed for participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline HCV-RNA assessment. HCV-RNA quantitation was performed using Roche High Pure System/COBAS® TaqMan® HCV Monitor Test. HCV-RNA measurement lower limit of detection was 28 IU/mL.
Measured: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 60 and 72
Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Response
Biochemical response was defined as normal serum alanine transaminase (ALT) measurement. For ALT measurement the normal range is 5-37 IU/L.
Measured: At Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 60 and 72
Percentage of Participants With ISHAK Histological Activity Index Response
ISHAK Histological Activity Index (HAI) activity response is defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 2 points (≥2 points drop from baseline) in the ISHAK modified HAI (necroinflammatory) score at week 72. ISHAK modified HAI activity (necroinflammatory) score is a total score of periportal ± bridging (P/B) necrosis + confluent necrosis + focal necrosis + portal inflammation (maximum score for each participant = 18). Where P/B necrosis grading as 0 = absent; 1 = mild; 2 = mild/moderate; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe; Confluent necrosis grading as 0 = absent; 1 = focal; 2 = zone 3 some areas; 3 = zone 3 most areas; 4 = zone 3 occasional portal; 5 = zone 3 multiple; 6 = panacinar necrosis and Focal necrosis grading as 0: absent; 1: < = 1 focus; 2: 2 to 4 foci; 3: 5 to 10 foci; 4: > 10 foci; Portal Inflammation grading: 0 = none; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = moderate/marked; 4 = marked/all portal.
Measured: At Week 72
Mean Change From Baseline in ISHAK HAI Activity (Necroinflammatory) at Week 72
ISHAK modified HAI activity (necroinflammatory) score is a total score of P/B necrosis + confluent necrosis + focal necrosis + portal inflammation (maximum score for each Participant = 18). Where P/B necrosis grading as 0 = absent; 1 = mild; 2 = mild/moderate; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe; Confluent necrosis as 0 = absent; 1 = focal; 2 = zone 3 some areas; 3 = zone 3 most areas; 4 = zone 3 occasional portal; 5= zone 3 multiple; 6= panacinar necrosis and Focal necrosis as 0: absent; 1: <= 1 focus; 2: 2 to 4 foci; 3: 5 to 10 foci; 4: > 10 foci; Portal Inflammation: 0 = none; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = moderate/marked; 4 = marked/all portal. The difference between study groups in change from baseline in ISHAK modified HAI activity score at week 72 was tested using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with ethnicity and baseline ISHAK HAI score as the fixed effects.
Measured: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72
Mean Change From Baseline in Fibrosis Score Based on ISHAK at Week 72
ISHAK Histological Activity Index (HAI) activity response is defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 2 points (≥2 points drop from baseline) score at week 72. Baseline prognostic factors in the original model include ethnicity, sex, age, baseline ALT quotient, baseline HCV-RNA level, and ISHAK fibrosis and activity scores at baseline. ISHAK modified HAI fibrosis scale by fibrosis grading category as F0= no fibrosis; F1= some portal areas; F2= most portal areas; F3= bridging fibrosis; F4= bridging and portal to central; F5 = marked bridging; F6 = Cirrhosis; where '0' being the best and '6' being the worst. Decrease in score from baseline indicates improvement. The difference between study groups in change from baseline in ISHAK modified HAI activity score at week 72 was analysed.
Measured: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72
Percentage of Participants With Improved, Stable and Worsened ISHAK Fibrosis Score
Overall ISHAK Fibrosis Score is defined as Improved: >= 1 category decrease in fibrosis scale; Stable: no change in fibrosis scale; Worsened: >1 category increase in fibrosis scale.
Measured: At Week 72
Mean Change From Baseline in Activity and Fibrosis Scores Based on METAVIR Activity at Week 72
METAVIR activity scores are categorised as histological activity (A) 0 = none; A1 = mild; A2 = moderate; A3 = severe where '0' being 'No activity' and '3' being 'the sever activity'. Changes in liver inflammation defined as Improved: Participants whose METAVIR activity score at up to Month-72 decreases by 1 or more units compared to baseline; stable: Participants whose METAVIR activity score at up to Month-72 is the same as the baseline score; worsened: Participants whose METAVIR activity score at up to Month-72 increases by 1 or more units compared to baseline. METAVIR fibrosis scores are categorised as fibrosis (F) 0 = no fibrosis; F1 = without septa; F 2 = with septa; F3 = many septa; F4 = cirrhosis where; '0' being the best and '4' being the worst. Decrease in score from baseline indicates improvement. The difference between study groups in change from baseline in activity and fibrosis scores based on METAVIR at week 72 was analysed.
Measured: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72
Percentage of Participants With Improved, Stable, and Worsened METAVIR Activity Score
METAVIR activity scale included activity defines as, Improved: >= 1 category decrease in activity score; stable: no change in activity score; worsened: > = 1 category increase in activity score.
Measured: At Week 72
Percentage of Participants With Improved, Stable, and Worsened METAVIR Fibrosis Score
METAVIR fibrosis score is categorized as, Improved: >= 1 category decrease in activity score; stable: no change in activity score; worsened: >= 1 category increase in activity score.
Measured: At Week 72
Mean Change From Baseline in Fat Score at Week 72
Grading categories for the fat scale were as follows: 1 = <5% hepatocytes; 2 = 6 - 33% hepatocytes; 3 = 34 - 66% hepatocytes; 4 = 67 - 100% hepatocytes.
Measured: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72
Percentage of Participants With Improved, Stable and Worsened Fat Score From Baseline to Week 72
Fat scores are categorised as Improved: > 1 category decrease in fat scale; stable: no change in fat scale; worsened: >= 1 category increase in fat scale.
Measured: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72
Percentage of Participants With Non-zero Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Score
The Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) included an assessment of sinusoidal fibrosis, Mallory bodies, and hepatocyte ballooning (HB). Grading categories for the NASH scales were as: Sinusoidal fibrosis: 0 = absent; 1 = involvement of some lobules; 2 = involvement of most lobules, without diffuse interstitial sinusoidal collagen deposition; 3 = Involvement of most or all lobules;, with diffuse interstitial fibrosis involving some or most of the lobules Mallory bodies: 0 = absent; 1 = involvement of some lobules; 2 = involvement of most lobules; 3= involvement of most or all lobules; and Hepatocyte ballooning: 0 = absent; 1 = involvement of some lobules; 2 = involvement of most lobules; 3= involvement of most or all lobules.
Measured: At Week 72
Mean Change in Fatigue Severity Scale Score and Fatigue Severity Scale Score Item 10 Visual Analog Scale Score From Baseline at Week 48 and Week 72
The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is a 10-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess tiredness, lack of energy, or total body give-out. Participants were to react to nine statements regarding fatigue over the previous 2 weeks, each on a scale (1 = completely agree, 7 = completely disagree). The FSS is the average of the scores on the 9 questions; ranging from 1-7, with lower scores indicating less fatigue. In addition, participants were to react to how much fatigue they had in the past 2 weeks by marking on a visual analogue scale (VAS) labelled at one end with "no fatigue" ('0' being the best) and at the other end with "greater fatigue" ('100' being the worst). Longer distance on the scale from "no fatigue" indicated "greater fatigue". FSS values are presented based on questionnaire and visual analog scale. FSS values at week 48 and 72 are presented based on questionnaire and visual analog scale.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 48 and Week 72
Mean Change in 36-item Short Form Health Survey Total and Domain Scores From Baseline at Week 48 and 72
The 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a 36-item self-report questionnaire that includes 8 domain scales The 8 domains are incorporated into 2 components: mental and physical. The mental component (MC) includes social functioning, role limitations-emotional, mental health, and vitality. The physical component (PC) includes physical functioning, role limitations-physical, bodily pain, and general health perception. Raw domain scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, [0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score]. Two summary scale scores were computed based on weighted combinations of the 8 domain scores (Physical and the Mental Component) where no minimum or maximum score; higher score indicate better health status. The difference between study groups in change from baseline in SF-36 score at week 48 and 72 was analysed.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 48 and Week 72
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event could therefore be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Pre-existing conditions that worsened during the study were reported as adverse events. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, or results in disability/incapacity, or congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Measured: Up to Week 72
Number of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory Parameters
The below table includes participants with marked abnormal lab parameters. Standard reference ranges include: Hematocrit: (fraction) 0.37 - 0.49, Hemoglobin 130 - 180 g/L, Platelets 150 - 350 10^9/L, White Blood Cell (WBC) 4.5 - 11.0 10^9/L, Lymphocytes 1.00 - 4.80 10^9/L, Neutrophils 1.80 - 7.70 10^9/L, Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 0-40 U/L, ALT 0 - 55 U/L, Total bilirubin 0 - 17 μmol/L, Thyroxine T4 58 - 140 nmol/L, Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) 0.0 - 5.0 million units (mU)/L, Albumin 35.0 - 55.0 g/L, Chloride 100 - 108 mmol/L, Calcium 2.10 - 2.60 mmol/L, Phosphate 0.84 - 1.45 mmol/L, Uric acid 214 - 506 μmol/L.
Measured: Up to Week 72
Number of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory Abnormalities
The table below includes participants with premature withdrawals due to adverse events or laboratory abnormalities.
Measured: Up to Week 72
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Apr 2005 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2004
- Primary completionSep 2007
- Study completionSep 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hepatitis C, ChronicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 569 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00107653
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ML18179
- Status last verified
- May 2016
- First submitted
- 6 Apr 2005
- Last updated
- 21 Jun 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Rodriguez-Torres M, Jeffers LJ, Sheikh MY, Rossaro L, Ankoma-Sey V, Hamzeh FM, Martin P; Latino Study Group. Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin in Latino and non-Latino whites with hepatitis C. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):257-67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805062.
PubMed 19144941
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jun 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label, Comparative, Efficacy Study of Pegasys® Plus Copegus® in Treatment-naïve Latino Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C-genotype 1, as Compared to Treatment-naïve Non- Latino Caucasian Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C-genotype 1
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00107653
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ML18179
- Conditions
- Hepatitis C, Chronic
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 569 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2004
- Primary completion
- Sep 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Apr 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 Jun 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This single arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of PEGASYS (180 micrograms sc weekly) plus ribavirin (1000-1200mg po daily) in treatment-naive Latino patients versus non-Latino Caucasian patients with chronic hepatitis C- genotype 1. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months and the target sample size is 500+ patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Latino | Experimental | Drug: Ribavirin, Drug: Peginterferon alfa-2aParticipants received peginterferon alfa-2a 180 microgram (mcg)/0.5 mL by subcutaneous injection once a week in combination with ribavirin 1000 or 1200 mg per day, which was taken orally in split doses for 48 weeks. Participants with <75 kg (165 lbs) of body weight received 1000 mg/day (400 mg in the morning and 600 mg in the evening). Participants with >=75 kg (165 lbs) of body weight received 1200 mg/day (600 mg in the morning and 600 mg in the evening). |
| Non-Latino White | Experimental | Drug: Ribavirin, Drug: Peginterferon alfa-2aParticipants received peginterferon alfa-2a 180 mcg/0.5 mL by subcutaneous injection once a week in combination with ribavirin 1000 or 1200 mg per day which was taken orally in split doses. Participants with <75 kg (165 lbs) of body weight received 1000 mg/day. Participants with >=75 kg (165 lbs) of body weight received 1200 mg/day for 48 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- adult patients 18-65 years of age
- chronic hepatitis C , genotype 1
- serologic evidence of CHC infection by an antibody test
- chronic liver disease, consistent with CHC infection on a liver biopsy obtained within the past 18 months
- compensated liver disease
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- previous interferon or ribavirin therapy
- systemic antiviral therapy less than 24 weeks before first dose of study drug or expected need for this treatment any time during the study
- medical condition associated with chronic liver disease (eg, hemochromatosis, autoimmune hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, toxin exposure)
- decompensated liver disease
- women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ribavirin1000-1200mg po daily for 48 weeks | Drug | Latino |
| Peginterferon alfa-2a180 micrograms sc/week for 48 weeks | Drug | Latino |
| Ribavirin1000-1200mg po daily for 48 weeks | Drug | Non-Latino White |
| Peginterferon alfa-2a180 micrograms sc/week for 48 weeks | Drug | Non-Latino White |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Week 72
Time frame: At Week 72
Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) is defined as percentage of participants with an undetectable hepatitis C virus-RNA (HCV-RNA) measurement (<28 International Unit (IU)/millilitre (mL)) assessed 24 weeks post-treatment (week 72) which was assessed by Roche High Pure System/COBAS TaqMan HCV Test.
20 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Achieving Virologic Response
Time frame: At Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 60, and 72
Percentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response at Week 4
Time frame: At Week 4
Percentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response at Week 12
Time frame: At Week 12
Change From Baseline in HCV-RNA Log10 Titers Over the Period Of Time
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 60 and 72
Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Response
Time frame: At Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 60 and 72
Percentage of Participants With ISHAK Histological Activity Index Response
Time frame: At Week 72
Mean Change From Baseline in ISHAK HAI Activity (Necroinflammatory) at Week 72
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72
Mean Change From Baseline in Fibrosis Score Based on ISHAK at Week 72
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72
Percentage of Participants With Improved, Stable and Worsened ISHAK Fibrosis Score
Time frame: At Week 72
Mean Change From Baseline in Activity and Fibrosis Scores Based on METAVIR Activity at Week 72
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72
Percentage of Participants With Improved, Stable, and Worsened METAVIR Activity Score
Time frame: At Week 72
Percentage of Participants With Improved, Stable, and Worsened METAVIR Fibrosis Score
Time frame: At Week 72
Mean Change From Baseline in Fat Score at Week 72
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72
Percentage of Participants With Improved, Stable and Worsened Fat Score From Baseline to Week 72
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72
Percentage of Participants With Non-zero Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Score
Time frame: At Week 72
Mean Change in Fatigue Severity Scale Score and Fatigue Severity Scale Score Item 10 Visual Analog Scale Score From Baseline at Week 48 and Week 72
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 48 and Week 72
Mean Change in 36-item Short Form Health Survey Total and Domain Scores From Baseline at Week 48 and 72
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 48 and Week 72
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Time frame: Up to Week 72
Number of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory Parameters
Time frame: Up to Week 72
Number of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory Abnormalities
Time frame: Up to Week 72
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jun 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 19144941Rodriguez-Torres M, Jeffers LJ, Sheikh MY, Rossaro L, Ankoma-Sey V, Hamzeh FM, Martin P; Latino Study Group. Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin in Latino and non-Latino whites with hepatitis C. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):257-67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805062.
Related trials for Hepatitis C, Chronic
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Liver Disease
Hepatitis D, Hepatitis C
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
People With CHC Who Achieved a Sustained Virological Response Following Therapy With Direct Acting Antiviral Agents
Diabetes Mellitus, Hepatitis C, Chronic
RecruitingObservational study
"Constitution of a Biological Collection to Establish Preclinical Translational Models for the Study of Tumors and Chronic Liver Diseases".
Chronic Liver Disease and Cirrhosis, Liver Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C During Pregnancy
Hepatitis C, Chronic, Pregnancy; Infection
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Comparative Autoantibody and Immunologic Cell Marker Study
Autoimmune Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
60 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Ribavirin and Peginterferon alfa-2a in people with Hepatitis C, Chronic, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 60 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jun 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 60 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Jun 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Week 72 (time frame: At Week 72). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00107653, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jun 2016.