Hepatitis BPhase 3NCT00065507
Comparison of Entecavir to Adefovir in Chronic Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Patients With Hepatic Decompensation
A Phase 3 study testing Entecavir (ETV) and Adefovir (ADV) in people with Hepatitis B, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 61 sites in 17 countries.
Trial summary
This is a phase IIIb comparative study of entecavir 1.0 mg once daily (QD) vs. adefovir 10 mg QD in patients who have chronic hepatitis B infection and hepatic decompensation. The patients are treated for 96 weeks after the last subject is randomized. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatitis B
- What is being tested?
- Entecavir (ETV) and Adefovir (ADV)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 195 participants
- Where
- 61 sitesin 17 countries
- Study dates
- Aug 2003to May 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Child-Pugh (CP) score >= 7
- Hepatitis B virus (HBV) viremia
Who cannot join
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 15 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV)/hepatitis D virus (HDV) coinfection
Trial locations and contacts
61 sites in 17 countries.
61 sites in 17 countries
United States16 sites
Pediatric Gasteroenterology
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205
Baylor University Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Ut Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390-9151
Henry Ford Health System Irb
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Hawaii Medical Center East
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96817
Indiana University Med Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-5121
The Cht Liver Research Center
Louisville, Kentucky, 40292
University Of Miami School Of Medicine
Miami, Florida, 33136
Yale University School Of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029
Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center (Cpmc)
New York, New York, 10032
Integris Baptist Medical Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112
Mcguire Dvamc
Richmond, Virginia, 23249
Research And Education, Inc.
San Diego, California, 92115
California Pacific Medical Center
San Francisco, California, 94115
Greece5 sites
Local institution
Athens, 11522
Local Institution
Athens, 11527
Local Institution
Athens, 15127
Local Instituition
Thessaloniki, 54006
Local Institution
Thessaloniki, 570 10
Taiwan5 sites
Local Institution
Changhua, 500
Local Institution
Taichung, 404
Local Institution
Taipei, 100
Local Institution
Taoyuan, 333
Local Institution
Tianan, 704
Brazil4 sites
Local Institution
Porto Alegre - Rs, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-003
Local institution
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246-000
Local Institution
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246-903
Local Institution
Sao Paulo - Sp, São Paulo, 05403-900
India4 sites
Local Institution
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500082
Local Institution
Kolkata, 700020
Local Institution
Lucknow, 226014
Local Institution
New Delhi, 110002
Poland4 sites
Local Institution
Bydgoszcz, 85-030
Local Institution
Chorzów, 41-500
Local Institution
Krakow, 31-202
Local Institution
Lodz, 91-347
Singapore4 sites
Local Institution
Singapore, 119228
Local Institution
Singapore, 169608
Local Institution
Singapore, 308433
Local Institution
Singapore, 529889
Russia3 sites
Local Institution
Moscow, 115446
Local Institution
Moscow, 117333
Local Institution
Smolensk, 214018
Thailand3 sites
Local Institution
Bangkok, 10400
Local Institution
Bangkok, 10700
Local Institution
Hat Yai, 90110
Canada2 sites
Local Institution
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1
Local Institution
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1H2
France2 sites
Local Institution
Clichy, 92118
Local Institution
Strasbourg, 67100
Philippines2 sites
Local Institution
Cebu, 6000
Local Institution
Manila, 1008
South Africa2 sites
Local Institution
Observatory, Western Cape, 7925
Local Institution
Paarl, Western Cape, 7620
Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
Local Institution
Adana, 01330
Local Institution
Izmir, 35100
About this study
Official title: Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Entecavir Versus Adefovir in Subjects Chronically Infected With Hepatitis B Virus and Evidence of Hepatic Decompensation
This is a phase IIIb comparative study of entecavir 1.0 mg once daily (QD) vs. adefovir 10 mg QD in patients who have chronic hepatitis B infection and hepatic decompensation. The patients are treated for 96 weeks after the last subject is randomized.
- Conditions
- Hepatitis B
- Being tested
- Entecavir (ETV), Adefovir (ADV)
- Keywords
- hepatic decompensation
- Medical subject headings
- Hepatitis B
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Entecavir (ETV)Drug
Also called Baraclude, BMS-200475
Tablets, Oral, 1 mg once daily, 96 weeks from the time the last patient is randomized
Adefovir (ADV)Drug
Tablets, Oral, 10 mg, once daily, 96 weeks from the time the last patient is randomized
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Entecavir (ETV) |
| A2 | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Adefovir (ADV) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) at Week 24
Mean reduction in serum HBV DNA determined by PCR assay (log10 copies/mL) at Week 24 adjusted for baseline HBV DNA and lamivudine resistance (LVDr) status, based on linear regression analysis.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Secondary outcomes (27)
Change From Baseline in HBV DNA by PCR at Week 48
Mean change from baseline in HBV DNA by PCR at Week 48, adjusted for baseline HBV DNA and LVDr Status.
Measured: Baseline, Week 48
Number of Participants With HBV DNA < 300 Copies/mL by PCR At Week 24
Measured: Week 24
Number of Participants With HBV DNA < 300 Copies/mL by PCR At Week 48
Measured: Week 48
Number of Participants Achieving Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Normalization (≤1.0 x Upper Limit of Normal [ULN]) at Weeks 24 and 48
Number of participants in each group who achieved ALT normalization (≤1.0 x upper limit of normal [ULN]) among those with baseline ALT >1.0 x ULN at Weeks 24 and 48
Measured: Week 24, Week 48
Number of Subjects Achieving Composite Endpoint (HBV DNA < 10*4 Copies/mL by PCR Assay and Normal ALT [≤ 1.0 x ULN]) Through Week 48
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48
>=2-Point Reduction From Baseline in Child-Pugh Score Through Week 48
Child-Pugh classification assesses the prognosis of chronic liver disease by 5 clinical measures, scored 1-3 each (most severe derangement=3). Score range: 5 (best prognosis) to 15 (worst prognosis).
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48
Number of Participants With Improvement or No Worsening in Child-Pugh Score From Baseline to Week 48
Number of participants in each group with improvement or no worsening in Child-Pugh score from baseline to Week 48 as measured by improvement or no worsening in Child-Pugh score. Child-Pugh classification assesses the prognosis of chronic liver disease by 5 clinical measures, scored 1-3 each (most severe derangement=3). Score range: 5 (best prognosis) to 15 (worst prognosis).
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48
Change From Baseline in Child-Pugh Score Through Week 48
Mean change from baseline in Child-Pugh score through week 48. Child-Pugh classification assesses the prognosis of chronic liver disease by 5 clinical measures, scored 1-3 each (most severe derangement=3). Score range: 5 (best prognosis) to 15 (worst prognosis).
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48
Number of Participants With Improvement in Child-Pugh Class at Week 24 and Week 48
Number of Participants in each group with improvement in Child-Pugh score from baseline to Week 48 as measured by improvement in Child-Pugh class. Improvement in Child-Pugh Class is defined as change from B to A or C to A. Evaluable subjects are subjects with Child-Pugh Class B or C at Baseline. Child-Pugh classification assesses the prognosis of chronic liver disease by 5 clinical measures, scored 1-3 each (most severe derangement=3). Score range: 5 (best prognosis) to 15 (worst prognosis). Child-Pugh class A to C employs the added score from above: 5-6=Class A; 7-9=Class B; 10-15=Class C.
Measured: Week 24, Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Scores From Baseline Through Week 48
Adjusted mean change from baseline in MELD score through Week 48 (adjusted for baseline value). The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), is a scoring system for assessing the severity of chronic liver disease. MELD uses the patient's values for serum bilirubin, serum creatinine, and the international normalized ratio for prothrombin time (INR) to predict survival. In interpreting the MELD Score in hospitalized patients, the 3 month mortality is: 40 or more=100% mortality; 30-39=83% mortality; 20-29=76% mortality; 10-19=27% mortality; <10=4% mortality.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48
Improvement or No Worsening in MELD Score Through Week 48
Participants with improvement or no worsening (any decrease or no change from baseline in score) in MELD score through Week 48. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), is a scoring system for assessing the severity of chronic liver disease. MELD uses the patient's values for serum bilirubin, serum creatinine, and the international normalized ratio for prothrombin time (INR) to predict survival. In interpreting the MELD Score in hospitalized patients, the 3 month mortality is: 40 or more=100% mortality; 30-39=83% mortality; 20-29=76% mortality; 10-19=27% mortality; <10=4% mortality.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life as Measured by the Short Form 36 (SF-36)
Scoring for the SF-36 will be done using the algorithm developed by the Research ANd Development(RAND) Corporation (a scale of 0-100). Higher scores represent better quality of life. Coding for items with 2-category responses=0 and 100; 3-category=0/50/100; 5-category=0/25/50/75/100; 6-category=0/20/40/60/80/100. Scores of items in the same scale are combined to create the 8 scale scores (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily-pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health). Physical and mental health composite scores will be computed for the group.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life, as Measured by EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) at Weeks 24 and 48
The EQ-5D has 5 attributes (mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each with 3 levels (no problem, some problems, and major problems). This algorithm gives valuation (weights) to each of the 15 responses on the form. Each valuation is a negative number, subtracted from the maximum score of 1 (perfect well being). The overall health index score ranges from 0 (dead) to 1 (perfect health) value scale, and the visual analog scale ranges from 0 to 100. Item weights will be obtained from the EuroQol group.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48
Change From Baseline in Albumin Through Week 48
Mean albumin levels, and mean change from baseline in albumin, a measure of synthetic liver function. Normal range for albumin = 3.5 - 5.3 g/dL.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Prothrombin Time Through Week 48
Mean prothrombin time, and mean change from baseline in prothrombin time, a measure of synthetic liver function. Prothrombin time is the time it takes (in seconds) for a sample of blood to clot. Normal range for prothrombin time (PT) = 10-13 seconds.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin Through Week 48
Mean total bilirubin levels, and mean change from baseline in total bilirubin, a measure of liver secretory function.Normal range for total bilirubin = 0.2 - 1.2 mg/dL.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48
Change From Baseline in Platelet Count Through Week 48
Mean baseline platelet count and mean change from baseline in platelet count at specific timepoints. Platelets are the smallest particles found in the blood, which play a major role in forming blood clots. Normal range for platelets = 140 - 450 X 10*9 c/L.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48
Participants Achieving Albumin Normalization Through Week 48
Number of participants who achieved normalization of albumin (>= 1 x lower limit of normal [LLN]), a measure of liver function, at specific timepoints.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48
Participants Achieving Prothrombin Time Normalization Through Week 48
Number of participants who achieved normalization of prothrombin time (<= 1 x ULN), a measure of liver function, at specific timepoints.
Measured: Baseline, Week4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48
Participants Achieving Total Bilirubin Normalization Through Week 48
Number of participants who achieved normalization of total bilirubin (<= 1 x ULN), a measure of liver function, at specific timepoints.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48
Participants Achieving Platelet Count Normalization Through Week 48
Number of participants who achieved normalization of platelet count (>= 1 x lower limit of normal [LLN]), a measure of liver function, at specific timepoints.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48
Number of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Events at Different Time Points Through Week 48
HCC-free survival was analyzed using life tables. Measured values show the number of HCC events among treated participants at given time points.
Measured: Week 48
Cumulative Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, HCC, Discontinuations Due to AEs, and Confirmed Creatinine Increase >=0.5 mg/dL
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence/worsening of a pre-existing medical condition regardless of causal relationship. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death; is life-threatening; requires/prolongs inpatient hospitalization; results in persistent/significant disability; is cancer; is congenital anomaly/birth defect; results in drug dependency/abuse; is an important medical event. Grades:1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Life-threatening/disabling, 5=Death. Confirmed increase in serum creatinine=values ≥0.5 mg/dL compared with baseline on 2 sequential measures.
Measured: on-treatment events obtained after the start of therapy and no more than 5 days after the last dose of study therapy.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Grade 3/4 Laboratory Abnormalities - Week 48 and Cumulative Data
Grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities (hematology, electrolyte, lipase, liver function, metabolic, renal function, urinalysis). The Week 48 data set was used to evaluate the Week-48 on-treatment safety. The cumulative data set was used to evaluate the safety while on treatment. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE) Grades:1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Life-threatening/disabling, 5=Death.
Measured: Week 48=all on-treatment laboratory measurements up to Week 48. Cumulative data = on-treatment laboratory measurements obtained after the start of therapy and no more than 5 days after the last dose of study therapy.
Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Flares - On Treatment
ALT flare=ALT > 2 x baseline and > 10 x upper limit of normal (ULN) by clinical laboratory evaluation. Table includes number of participants with selected clinical events and/or laboratory abnormalities during ALT flares. Selected clinical events during ALT flares=ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, jaundice, bacterial peritonitis. Selected Laboratory abnormalities during ALT flares=international normalized ratio > 1.5 or prothrombin time >= 1.2 x ULN and total bilirubin >2.5 mg/dL and > 1 mg/dL increase from baseline.
Measured: On-treatment=up to Week 48 (Day 336); if discontinued early, all data up to 5 days after discontinuation date.
Number of Participants With Malignant Neoplasms - On Treatment or During 24-Week Follow-up Period
Data includes type of malignant neoplasm.
Measured: On-treatment=up to Week 48 (Day 336); if discontinued early, all data up to 5 days after discontinuation date. 24-week follow-up=limited to end-of-dosing values and those from 6 days after last dose of study therapy to end of follow-up.
Number of Participants Undergoing Liver Transplant - On-Treatment or 24-Week Follow-Up
Measured: On-treatment=up to Week 48 (Day 336); if discontinued early, all data up to 5 days after discontinuation date. 24-week follow-up=limited to end-of-dosing values and those from 6 days after last dose of study therapy to end of follow-up.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jul 2003 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2003
- Primary completionOct 2008
- Study completionMay 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Hepatitis BStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bristol-Myers SquibbThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 195 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Study director, Bristol-Myers Squibb
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00065507
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AI463-048
- Status last verified
- Jun 2013
- First submitted
- 28 Jul 2003
- Last updated
- 24 Jun 2013
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jun 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Entecavir Versus Adefovir in Subjects Chronically Infected With Hepatitis B Virus and Evidence of Hepatic Decompensation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00065507
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AI463-048
- Conditions
- Hepatitis B
- Keywords
- hepatic decompensation
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 195 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers SquibbIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Aug 2003
- Primary completion
- Oct 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Jul 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 2 Jul 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a phase IIIb comparative study of entecavir 1.0 mg once daily (QD) vs. adefovir 10 mg QD in patients who have chronic hepatitis B infection and hepatic decompensation. The patients are treated for 96 weeks after the last subject is randomized.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A1 | Experimental | Drug: Entecavir (ETV) |
| A2 | Active comparator | Drug: Adefovir (ADV) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Child-Pugh (CP) score >= 7
- Hepatitis B virus (HBV) viremia
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 15 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV)/hepatitis D virus (HDV) coinfection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Entecavir (ETV)Also: Baraclude, BMS-200475Tablets, Oral, 1 mg once daily, 96 weeks from the time the last patient is randomized | Drug | A1 |
| Adefovir (ADV)Tablets, Oral, 10 mg, once daily, 96 weeks from the time the last patient is randomized | Drug | A2 |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Mean reduction in serum HBV DNA determined by PCR assay (log10 copies/mL) at Week 24 adjusted for baseline HBV DNA and lamivudine resistance (LVDr) status, based on linear regression analysis.
27 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in HBV DNA by PCR at Week 48
Time frame: Baseline, Week 48
Number of Participants With HBV DNA < 300 Copies/mL by PCR At Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Number of Participants With HBV DNA < 300 Copies/mL by PCR At Week 48
Time frame: Week 48
Number of Participants Achieving Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Normalization (≤1.0 x Upper Limit of Normal [ULN]) at Weeks 24 and 48
Time frame: Week 24, Week 48
Number of Subjects Achieving Composite Endpoint (HBV DNA < 10*4 Copies/mL by PCR Assay and Normal ALT [≤ 1.0 x ULN]) Through Week 48
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48
>=2-Point Reduction From Baseline in Child-Pugh Score Through Week 48
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48
Number of Participants With Improvement or No Worsening in Child-Pugh Score From Baseline to Week 48
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48
Change From Baseline in Child-Pugh Score Through Week 48
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48
Number of Participants With Improvement in Child-Pugh Class at Week 24 and Week 48
Time frame: Week 24, Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Scores From Baseline Through Week 48
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48
Improvement or No Worsening in MELD Score Through Week 48
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life as Measured by the Short Form 36 (SF-36)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48
Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life, as Measured by EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) at Weeks 24 and 48
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48
Change From Baseline in Albumin Through Week 48
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Prothrombin Time Through Week 48
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin Through Week 48
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48
Change From Baseline in Platelet Count Through Week 48
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48
Participants Achieving Albumin Normalization Through Week 48
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48
Participants Achieving Prothrombin Time Normalization Through Week 48
Time frame: Baseline, Week4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48
Participants Achieving Total Bilirubin Normalization Through Week 48
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48
Participants Achieving Platelet Count Normalization Through Week 48
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48
Number of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Events at Different Time Points Through Week 48
Time frame: Week 48
Cumulative Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, HCC, Discontinuations Due to AEs, and Confirmed Creatinine Increase >=0.5 mg/dL
Time frame: on-treatment events obtained after the start of therapy and no more than 5 days after the last dose of study therapy.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Grade 3/4 Laboratory Abnormalities - Week 48 and Cumulative Data
Time frame: Week 48=all on-treatment laboratory measurements up to Week 48. Cumulative data = on-treatment laboratory measurements obtained after the start of therapy and no more than 5 days after the last dose of study therapy.
Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Flares - On Treatment
Time frame: On-treatment=up to Week 48 (Day 336); if discontinued early, all data up to 5 days after discontinuation date.
Number of Participants With Malignant Neoplasms - On Treatment or During 24-Week Follow-up Period
Time frame: On-treatment=up to Week 48 (Day 336); if discontinued early, all data up to 5 days after discontinuation date. 24-week follow-up=limited to end-of-dosing values and those from 6 days after last dose of study therapy to end of follow-up.
Number of Participants Undergoing Liver Transplant - On-Treatment or 24-Week Follow-Up
Time frame: On-treatment=up to Week 48 (Day 336); if discontinued early, all data up to 5 days after discontinuation date. 24-week follow-up=limited to end-of-dosing values and those from 6 days after last dose of study therapy to end of follow-up.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jun 2013.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Hepatitis B
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Sequential Therapy With Daplusiran/Tomligisiran (DAP/TOM) Followed by Bepirovirsen in Participants Living With Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)
Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection, Hepatitis B
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Liver Disease
Hepatitis D, Hepatitis C
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Study of Bepirovirsen in Participants Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection (B-Focus)
Hepatitis B
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Long-term Follow-up Study to Evaluate Durability of Treatment Response in Previous Bepirovirsen Study Participants (B-Sure)
Hepatitis B
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
A Phase I Clinical Trial of CPU-YL01 Injection in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B.
Chronic Hepatitis B
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bristol-Myers Squibb study director
Bristol-Myers Squibb
61 sites in 17 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Entecavir (ETV) and Adefovir (ADV) in people with Hepatitis B, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 61 sites in 17 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 61 sites in United States, Greece, Taiwan, Brazil, India and 12 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Jul 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) at Week 24 (time frame: Baseline, Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2013.