AzTrials
AzTrials

LymphomaPhase 2/3NCT00060385

Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Etoposide in Treating Older Patients With Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

A Phase 2/3 study testing CHOP regimen, EPOCH regimen and cyclophosphamide in people with Lymphoma, run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC at 1 site in Belgium.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 70 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Lymphoma
What is being tested?
CHOP regimen, EPOCH regimen and cyclophosphamide
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
3 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
Mar 2003to Aug 2004
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 70 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell* or peripheral T-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma by REAL/WHO classification, including the following:
  • All morphological and clinical variants
  • All Ann Arbor stages NOTE: *Presence of a small cell, indolent lymphoma component in the bone marrow biopsy is allowed
  • No Burkitt-like lymphoma
  • Previously untreated disease
  • No cerebral or meningeal involvement
  • At least 1 measurable target lesion at least 1.1 cm by the Cheson criteria

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age

  • 70 and over

Performance status

  • WHO 0-2

Life expectancy

  • Not specified

Hematopoietic

  • Absolute neutrophil count greater than 1,500/mm^3
  • Platelet count greater than 100,000/mm^3 (unless related to bone marrow infiltration)

Hepatic

  • Bilirubin less than 1.8 mg/dL*
  • AST or ALT less than 2.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)*
  • Alkaline phosphatase less than 4 times ULN* NOTE: *Values above these thresholds are allowed only if related to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Renal

  • Creatinine clearance at least 50 mL/min

Cardiovascular

  • LVEF at least 50%

Other

  • HIV negative
  • No history of concurrent severe disease that would preclude study treatment
  • No other prior or concurrent malignancy except adequately treated basal cell skin cancer, curatively treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or other curatively treated solid malignancy with no evidence of disease for at least 5 years prior to study entry
  • No psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical condition that would preclude study compliance and follow-up

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy

  • Not specified

Chemotherapy

  • Not specified

Endocrine therapy

  • Not specified

Radiotherapy

  • Not specified

Surgery

  • Not specified

Other

  • No concurrent participation in another investigational drug study
  • No other concurrent antineoplastic agents

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • U.Z. Gasthuisberg

    Leuven, B-3000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Diffuse Large B Cell And Peripheral T Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas (NHL) In The Elderly. Influence Of Prolonged Oral Etoposide Added To CHOP Combination Chemotherapy In Patients With Good Physiological Status. An EORTC Randomized Phase II-III Trial Including Geriatric Assessment And Quality Of Life

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase II/III trial to compare the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy with or without etoposide in treating older patients who have non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that has not been previously treated.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

  • Compare the complete response rates in older patients with diffuse large B-cell or peripheral T-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) with vs without etoposide.
  • Compare the overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare the time to treatment failure in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare the freedom from progression in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Determine the toxicity of CHOP plus etoposide in these patients.
  • Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to cellular type (B-cell vs T-cell), initial stage of disease (I and II vs III and IV), WHO performance status (0-1 vs 2), and lactic dehydrogenase level (LDH) (normal vs abnormal). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

  • Arm I (CHOP chemotherapy): Patients receive cyclophosphamide IV, doxorubicin IV, and vincristine IV on day 1. Patients also receive oral prednisone on days 1-5. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 3 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Patients then undergo disease evaluation.

Patients with disease progression or no change in disease are removed from study. Patients with responsive stage I or II disease receive 1 additional course if they demonstrate all 3 of the following conditions (at baseline): no LDH elevation, WHO performance status of 0-1, and greatest single diameter of any tumor site less than 5 cm. Patients with responsive stage I or II disease receive 3 additional courses if they demonstrate 1 or more of the following conditions (at baseline): LDH elevation, WHO performance status 2, and/or greatest single diameter of any tumor site at least 5 cm. Patients with responsive stage III or IV disease receive 3 additional courses.

After the completion of chemotherapy, patients with responsive stage I or II disease undergo involved field radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week for 3.5-4 weeks. Patients with initial bulky stage III or IV disease may also undergo radiotherapy.

  • Arm II (CHOP chemotherapy and etoposide): Patients receive CHOP chemotherapy as in arm I plus oral etoposide 2 or 3 times daily on days 1-10. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 3 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Patients receive additional courses as in arm I.

After the completion of chemotherapy, patients with responsive stage I or II disease or initial bulky stage III or IV disease undergo radiotherapy as in arm I.

Quality of life is assessed at baseline, after course 3, at the end of chemotherapy, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.

Patients are followed every 3 months for 3 years, every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually thereafter.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 686 patients (126 for phase II and 560 for phase III) will be accrued for this study within 5 years.

Conditions
Lymphoma
Being tested
CHOP regimen, EPOCH regimen, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride, etoposide
Keywords
stage I adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, stage I cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, stage II adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, stage II cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, stage III adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, stage III cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, stage IV adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, stage IV cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, stage I mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome, stage II mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome, stage III mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome, stage IV mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome, contiguous stage II adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage I adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage III adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage IV adult diffuse large cell lymphoma
Medical subject headings
Lymphoma, Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma, Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous, Mycosis Fungoides, Sezary Syndrome, Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 May 2003 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2003
  3. Primary completionAug 2004

Why it stopped: low accrual

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Enrolment
3 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00060385
Sponsor's protocol ID
EORTC-20991
Other IDs
EORTC-20991
Status last verified
Sep 2012
First submitted
6 May 2003
Last updated
24 Sep 2012
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing CHOP regimen, EPOCH regimen and cyclophosphamide in people with Lymphoma, run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: low accrual). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in