AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung CancerPhase 3NCT00054197

Polyglutamate Paclitaxel Compared With Gemcitabine or Vinorelbine in Treating Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

A Phase 3 study testing gemcitabine hydrochloride, paclitaxel poliglumex and vinorelbine tartrate in people with Lung Cancer, run by CTI BioPharma at 10 sites in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether polyglutamate paclitaxel is more effective than gemcitabine or vinorelbine in treating non-small cell lung cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 120 years
Conditions the study is for
Lung Cancer
What is being tested?
gemcitabine hydrochloride, paclitaxel poliglumex and vinorelbine tartrate
How many people
Not given
Where
10 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2003to Oct 2004
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 120 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) meeting 1 of the following criteria:
  • Locally advanced or recurrent disease previously treated with radiotherapy and/or surgery
  • Stage IIIB and not a candidate for combined modality therapy
  • Stage IV
  • No evidence of small cell carcinoma, carcinoid, or mixed small cell/non-small cell histology
  • Cytological diagnosis must be based on the following:
  • No cellular diagnosis by sputum cytology alone
  • Cytologic specimens obtained from brushings, washings, or needle aspiration of a defined lesion or pleural effusion are acceptable
  • Measurable or nonmeasurable disease
  • Brain metastases allowed provided patient received prior standard antitumor therapy for CNS metastases (e.g., whole brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radioablation, or surgery) and the following conditions are met:
  • Neurologic function stable for at least 2 weeks before study entry
  • Off steroid therapy or on a tapering regimen
  • Recovered from prior therapy

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age

  • 18 and over

Performance status

  • ECOG 2

Life expectancy

  • Not specified

Hematopoietic

  • Absolute neutrophil count at least 1,500/mm^3
  • Platelet count at least 100,000/mm^3

Hepatic

  • Bilirubin no greater than upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • SGOT/SGPT no greater than 2.5 times ULN (5 times ULN if liver metastases present)
  • Alkaline phosphatase no greater than 2.5 times ULN (except for laboratory documentation that demonstrates bone origin)

Renal

  • Creatinine no greater than 1.5 times ULN

Cardiovascular

  • No unstable angina
  • No myocardial infarction within the past 6 months
  • Cardiac conduction abnormalities (e.g., bundle branch block or heart block) allowed provided cardiac status has been stable for at least 6 months prior to study entry

Neurologic

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • No neuropathy greater than grade 1
  • No evidence of unstable neurologic symptoms within the past 4 weeks (2 weeks for neurologic symptoms due to brain metastases)

Other

  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception
  • No intolerance to excipients of polyglutamate paclitaxel (e.g., poly-L-glutamic acid, poloxamer 188, dibasic sodium phosphate, or monobasic sodium hydroxide)
  • No clinically significant active infection
  • No other concurrent primary malignancy except carcinoma in situ or nonmelanoma skin cancer
  • No other unstable medical conditions
  • No circumstance that would preclude study completion or follow-up

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy

  • No prior systemic biologic agent for lung cancer

Chemotherapy

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • No prior systemic chemotherapy for lung cancer including radiosensitizing agents

Endocrine therapy

  • See Disease Characteristics

Radiotherapy

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • No concurrent radiotherapy

Surgery

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • Recovered from prior major surgery

Other

  • More than 12 weeks since prior participation in any research study or treatment with investigational drugs
  • Recovered from prior investigational therapy or stable for 4 weeks before study treatment
  • No other concurrent investigational drugs
  • No other concurrent systemic antitumor therapy
  • No concurrent amifostine
  • Concurrent bisphosphonates allowed

Trial locations and contacts

10 sites in 1 country.

10 sites in 1 country

United States10 sites
  • Cooper Green Hospital

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

  • Clinical Research Services

    Bismarck, North Dakota, 58501

  • Charleston Hematology-Oncology, P.A.

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29403

  • Northwest Oncology and Hematology Associates

    Coral Springs, Florida, 33065

  • Western Washington Medical Group

    Everett, Washington, 98201

  • Medical Oncology/Hematology

    Gilroy, California, 95020

  • New York Oncology Hematology, P.C. - Latham

    Latham, New York, 12110-0610

  • Western Washington Oncology, Incorporated

    Olympia, Washington, 98502

  • Medschool Associates North

    Reno, Nevada, 89502

  • Midwest Cancer Research Group, Incorporated

    Skokie, Illinois, 60077

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: CT-2103 vs Gemcitabine or Vinorelbine for the Treatment of PS = 2 Patients With Chemotherapy Naive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Phase III Study

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether polyglutamate paclitaxel is more effective than gemcitabine or vinorelbine in treating non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of polyglutamate paclitaxel with that of gemcitabine or vinorelbine in treating patients who have stage IIIB, stage IV, or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

  • Compare the efficacy of polyglutamate paclitaxel (CT-2103) vs gemcitabine or vinorelbine, in terms of duration of overall survival, in patients with stage IIIB or IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer who have a performance status of 2.
  • Compare the safety of these regimens in these patients.
  • Compare the disease control (percentage of patients with no disease progression for at least 12 weeks) and time to progression in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare the response rate in patients with measurable disease treated with these regimens.
  • Compare the improvement in lung cancer symptoms in patients treated with these regimens.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to gender, disease stage (IV vs other), geographic location (US vs Western Europe and Canada vs the rest of the world), and prior brain metastases (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

  • Arm I: Patients receive polyglutamate paclitaxel (CT-2103) IV over 10 minutes on day 1 every 21 days.
  • Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days OR vinorelbine IV over 6-10 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 every 21 days.

Treatment repeats in both arms for up to 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Patients are followed at 3 weeks and then every 8 weeks thereafter.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 370 patients (185 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 13 months.

Conditions
Lung Cancer
Being tested
gemcitabine hydrochloride, paclitaxel poliglumex, vinorelbine tartrate
Keywords
recurrent non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer, stage IV non-small cell lung cancer
Medical subject headings
Lung Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Feb 2003 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2003
  3. Primary completionOct 2004
  4. Study completionOct 2004

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Masking
None (open label)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00054197
Sponsor's protocol ID
CTI-PGT304
Other IDs
CDR0000269908
Status last verified
Oct 2020
First submitted
5 Feb 2003
Last updated
5 Oct 2020
Results posted
No

Publications

  • O'Brien ME, Socinski MA, Popovich AY, Bondarenko IN, Tomova A, Bilynsky BT, Hotko YS, Ganul VL, Kostinsky IY, Eisenfeld AJ, Sandalic L, Oldham FB, Bandstra B, Sandler AB, Singer JW. Randomized phase III trial comparing single-agent paclitaxel Poliglumex (CT-2103, PPX) with single-agent gemcitabine or vinorelbine for the treatment of PS 2 patients with chemotherapy-naive advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2008 Jul;3(7):728-34. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31817c6b68.

    PubMed 18594318

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing gemcitabine hydrochloride, paclitaxel poliglumex and vinorelbine tartrate in people with Lung Cancer, run by CTI BioPharma at 10 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 10 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00054197, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Oct 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in