AzTrials
AzTrials

Brain and Central Nervous System TumorsPhase 3NCT00052455

Temozolomide Compared to Procarbazine, Lomustine, and Vincristine in Treating Patients With Recurrent Malignant Glioma

A Phase 3 study testing lomustine, procarbazine hydrochloride and temozolomide in people with Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors, run by Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which regimen of chemotherapy is more effective in treating recurrent malignant glioma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors
What is being tested?
lomustine, procarbazine hydrochloride and temozolomide
How many people
500 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Oct 2002to Sep 2010
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed anaplastic astrocytoma, glioblastoma multiforme, or gliosarcoma
  • WHO grade III or IV at diagnosis or relapse
  • Must have undergone primary therapy including radiotherapy
  • Must be in first recurrence confirmed by CT scan or MRI
  • Evaluable disease by CT scan or MRI

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age

  • 18 and over

Performance status

  • WHO 0-3

Life expectancy

  • At least 1 month

Hematopoietic

  • Absolute neutrophil count at least 1,500/mm^3
  • Platelet count at least 100,000/mm^3

Hepatic

  • Total and direct bilirubin less than 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • SGOT or SGPT less than 3 times ULN
  • Alkaline phosphatase less than 2 times ULN

Renal

  • BUN less than 1.5 times ULN
  • Creatinine less than 1.5 times ULN

Other

  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception
  • No other concurrent serious illness
  • Considered fit to receive chemotherapy

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy

  • Not specified

Chemotherapy

  • No prior chemotherapy for glioma

Endocrine therapy

  • Not specified

Radiotherapy

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • At least 2 months since prior radiotherapy
  • No prior radiosurgery, interstitial radiotherapy, or brachytherapy for glioma

Surgery

  • Prior debulking surgery for recurrent disease allowed

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit

    London, England, NW1 2DA

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Randomised Trial Comparing Temozolomide With PCV In The Treatment Of Recurrent WHO Astrocytic Tumours Grades III And IV

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which regimen of chemotherapy is more effective in treating recurrent malignant glioma.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of temozolomide alone to that of procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine in treating patients who have recurrent malignant glioma.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

  • Compare the efficacy of temozolomide vs procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine, in terms of overall survival, in patients with recurrent malignant glioma.
  • Compare progression-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare progression-free survival at 12 weeks in patients treated with two different schedules of temozolomide.
  • Compare the overall survival of patients treated with two different schedules of temozolomide.
  • Compare toxic effects of two different schedules of temozolomide in these patients.
  • Compare quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

  • Arm I:Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment schedules:
  • Schedule 1: Patients receive oral temozolomide once daily on days 1-5.
  • Schedule 2:Patients receive oral temozolomide once daily on days 1-21. Treatment on both schedules repeats every 4 weeks for a maximum of 9 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
  • Arm II:Patients receive oral lomustine and vincristine IV on day 1 and oral procarbazine on days 1-21. Treatment repeats every 6 weeks for a maximum of 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Quality of life is assessed at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks.

Patients are followed every 12 weeks.

Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 500 patients (250 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study.

Being tested
lomustine, procarbazine hydrochloride, temozolomide, vincristine sulfate
Keywords
adult glioblastoma, adult anaplastic astrocytoma, recurrent adult brain tumor, adult giant cell glioblastoma, adult gliosarcoma
Medical subject headings
Central Nervous System Neoplasms, Glioblastoma, Astrocytoma, Brain Neoplasms, Gliosarcoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall survival

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Progression-free survival at 12 weeks (Arm II)

  2. Toxicity

  3. Overall survival

  4. Quality of life as measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 and BTM

  5. Cost effectiveness

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2002
  3. Study completionSep 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
500 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00052455
Sponsor's protocol ID
CDR0000258428
Other IDs
MRC-BR12, EU-20114, ISRCTN83176944
Status last verified
May 2007
First submitted
24 Jan 2003
Last updated
18 Dec 2013
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Brada M, Stenning S, Gabe R, Thompson LC, Levy D, Rampling R, Erridge S, Saran F, Gattamaneni R, Hopkins K, Beall S, Collins VP, Lee SM. Temozolomide versus procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine in recurrent high-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Oct 20;28(30):4601-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.1932. Epub 2010 Sep 20.

    PubMed 20855843

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing lomustine, procarbazine hydrochloride and temozolomide in people with Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors, run by Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Dec 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall survival. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00052455, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Dec 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in