Renal Cell CarcinomaPhase 3NCT00033904
Survival Study Of Oncophage® vs. Observation In Patients With Kidney Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing autologous human tumor-derived HSPPC-96 in people with Renal Cell Carcinoma, run by Agenus Inc. at 76 sites in 11 countries.
Trial summary
Determine whether patients receiving adjuvant HSPPC-96 treatment after surgically resected, locally advanced renal cell carcinoma have improved recurrence-free survival as compared to subjects with no adjuvant treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Renal Cell Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- autologous human tumor-derived HSPPC-96
- How many people
- 650 participants
- Where
- 76 sitesin 11 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2000to Apr 2007
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Pre-Surgery Inclusion Criteria:
- Primary-intact resectable renal cell cancer, without known distant metastasis and be scheduled to have surgery with curative intent;
- Tumor size greater than or equal to 5 cm OR macroscopic nodes OR renal vein thrombus OR vena cava thrombus by radiologic evaluation
- Performance status (Zubrod / ECOG-WHO scale)less than or equal to 1 and life expectancy of greater than three months, within 2 weeks of surgery.
- Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative urine or serum pregnancy test within 2 weeks of surgery.
- Signed written informed consent.
Pre-Surgery Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior chemo-, hormonal, immuno- or radiotherapy for renal cell cancer;
- History of primary or secondary immunodeficiency, or patients using immunosuppressive drugs, e.g. systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporin A;
- Current malignancies at other sites or previous other cancer within the last 5 years, with the exception of adequately treated cone-biopsied in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri or basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin;
- Embolization of the renal artery prior to nephrectomy;
- Known distant metastases;
- Active, uncontrolled infection or other serious medical illnesses.
Eligibility Assessment:
(between 2 weeks pre- and 4 weeks post-surgery)
Prior to randomization and entry into the tumor evaluation phase, all subjects must undergo testing to confirm that they are free of distant metastatic disease, and that they meet all other criteria.
Eligibility Criteria which must be assessed and confirmed prior to randomization:
- No evidence of metastatic or residual renal carcinoma as documented by all of the following: abdominal/pelvis CT scan; chest CT scan; and brain CT or MRI scan.
- Provide Antigenics with greater than or equal to 7 grams of viable tumor tissue
- Adequate bone marrow function.
- Adequate renal and hepatic function.
- Adequate cardiac function.
- Signed written informed consent.
- Patients must be willing to be followed during the course of tumor evaluation and follow-up phases.
- Male or female patients of child producing potential must agree to use adequate contraception during the treatment/observation phase of the study.
- Patients must not use any other investigational drug for four weeks prior to the start of the tumor evaluation phase and throughout the tumor evaluation phase of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
76 sites in 11 countries.
76 sites in 11 countries
United States39 sites
Study site
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Study site
Anchorage, Alaska
Study site
Atlanta, Georgia
Study site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
Study site
Boca Raton, Florida
Study site
Boston, Massachusetts
Study site
Charlotte, North Carolina
Study site
Chicago, Illinois
Study site
Cincinnati, Ohio
Study site
Cleveland, Ohio
Study site
Columbus, Ohio
Study site
Denver, Colorado
Study site
Eugene, Oregon
Study site
Farmington, Connecticut
Study site
Fort Worth, Texas
Study site
Gretna, Louisiana, 70056
Study site
Houston, Texas
Study site
Iowa City, Iowa
Study site
Kansas City, Kansas
Study site
Knoxville, Tennessee
Study site
Los Angeles, California
Study site
Manhasset, New York
Study site
Maywood, Illinois
Study site
Miami, Florida
Study site
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Study site
Nashville, Tennessee
Study site
New York, New York
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Study site
Portland, Oregon
Study site
Richmond, Virginia
Study site
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Study site
Rochester, New York
Study site
San Francisco, California
Study site
Seattle, Washington
Study site
South Burlington, Vermont
Study site
St Louis, Missouri
Study site
Tampa, Florida
Study site
Tucson, Arizona
Study site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Canada7 sites
Study site
Calgary, Alberta
Study site
London, Ontario
Study site
Montreal, Quebec
Study site
Québec, Quebec
Study site
Toronto, Ontario
Study site
Vancouver, British Columbia
Study site
Victoria, British Columbia
Poland7 sites
Study site
Bialystok
Study site
Gdansk
Study site
Kielce
Study site
Krakow
Study site
Lublin
Study site
Szczecin
Study site
Warsaw
Israel5 sites
Study site
Beer-Yaacob, Zerifin
Study site
Haifa
Study site
Holon
Study site
Jerusalem
Study site
Tel HaShomer
France4 sites
Study site
Lille
Study site
Strasbourg
Study site
Toulouse
Study site
Villejuif
Sweden4 sites
Study site
Gothenburg
Study site
Lund
Study site
Umeå
Study site
Uppsala
About this study
Official title: A Multi-Center, Randomized Phase III Study of Adjuvant Oncophage® Versus Observation in Subjects With High Risk of Recurrence After Surgical Treatment for Renal Cell Carcinoma
Determine whether patients receiving adjuvant HSPPC-96 treatment after surgically resected, locally advanced renal cell carcinoma have improved recurrence-free survival as compared to subjects with no adjuvant treatment.
Read the detailed description
Primary Objective:
- The primary objective of this study is to determine whether subjects randomized to receive adjuvant HSPPC-96 after surgical resection of locally advanced renal cell carcinoma at high risk of recurrence, have improved recurrence-free survival as compared to subjects with no adjuvant treatment.
Secondary Objective:
- Determine whether subjects randomized to receive HSPPC-96 have improved survival as compared to subjects with no adjuvant treatment.
- Further characterize the safety profile of HSPPC-96.
- Conditions
- Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Being tested
- autologous human tumor-derived HSPPC-96
- Keywords
- Kidney Cancer, renal, immunotherapy, tumor,
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Kidney Neoplasms, Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
autologous human tumor-derived HSPPC-96Drug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Apr 2002 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2000
- Primary completionApr 2007
- Study completionApr 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Renal Cell CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 650 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Agenus Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00033904
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C-100-12 Part I
- Status last verified
- Sep 2012
- First submitted
- 12 Apr 2002
- Last updated
- 7 Sep 2012
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Wood C, Srivastava P, Bukowski R, Lacombe L, Gorelov AI, Gorelov S, Mulders P, Zielinski H, Hoos A, Teofilovici F, Isakov L, Flanigan R, Figlin R, Gupta R, Escudier B; C-100-12 RCC Study Group. An adjuvant autologous therapeutic vaccine (HSPPC-96; vitespen) versus observation alone for patients at high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 2008 Jul 12;372(9633):145-154. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60697-2. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
PubMed 18602688
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Sep 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multi-Center, Randomized Phase III Study of Adjuvant Oncophage® Versus Observation in Subjects With High Risk of Recurrence After Surgical Treatment for Renal Cell Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00033904
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C-100-12 Part I
- Conditions
- Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Keywords
- Kidney Cancer, renal, immunotherapy, tumor,
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 650 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Agenus Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2000
- Primary completion
- Apr 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Apr 2002 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Determine whether patients receiving adjuvant HSPPC-96 treatment after surgically resected, locally advanced renal cell carcinoma have improved recurrence-free survival as compared to subjects with no adjuvant treatment.
Detailed description
Primary Objective:
- The primary objective of this study is to determine whether subjects randomized to receive adjuvant HSPPC-96 after surgical resection of locally advanced renal cell carcinoma at high risk of recurrence, have improved recurrence-free survival as compared to subjects with no adjuvant treatment.
Secondary Objective:
- Determine whether subjects randomized to receive HSPPC-96 have improved survival as compared to subjects with no adjuvant treatment.
- Further characterize the safety profile of HSPPC-96.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| autologous human tumor-derived HSPPC-96 | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Sep 2012.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 18602688Wood C, Srivastava P, Bukowski R, Lacombe L, Gorelov AI, Gorelov S, Mulders P, Zielinski H, Hoos A, Teofilovici F, Isakov L, Flanigan R, Figlin R, Gupta R, Escudier B; C-100-12 RCC Study Group. An adjuvant autologous therapeutic vaccine (HSPPC-96; vitespen) versus observation alone for patients at high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 2008 Jul 12;372(9633):145-154. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60697-2. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
Related trials for Renal Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-011)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Toripalimab and Lenvatinib With or Without SBRT Before Surgery for Non-Clear Cell Kidney Cancer
Nonmetastatic Locally Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Pucotenlimab, Lenvatinib, and SBRT Before Surgery for Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
76 sites in 11 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing autologous human tumor-derived HSPPC-96 in people with Renal Cell Carcinoma, run by Agenus Inc. at 76 sites in 11 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Sep 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 76 sites in United States, Canada, Poland, Israel, France and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00033904, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Sep 2012.