Breast CancerPhase 3NCT00022672
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Herceptin® (Trastuzumab) in Combination With Arimidex® (Anastrozole) an Aromatase Inhibitor Compared to Arimidex® Alone in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing trastuzumab (Herceptin®) and anastrazole (Arimidex®) in people with Breast Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 132 sites in 26 countries.
Trial summary
This 2 arm study assessed the safety and efficacy of adding intravenous trastuzumab (Herceptin®) to daily oral anastrozole (Arimidex®) tablets as first- and second-line treatment in postmenopausal patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) overexpressing metastatic breast cancer (ER+ve and/or… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- trastuzumab (Herceptin®) and anastrazole (Arimidex®)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 208 participants
- Where
- 132 sitesin 26 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2001to Oct 2009
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- postmenopausal women;
- metastatic breast cancer suitable for endocrine therapy;
- positive hormone receptor status;
- Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression.
Who cannot join
- patients on hormone replacement therapy;
- previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease;
- uncontrolled cardiac disease and history of cardiac failure.
Trial locations and contacts
132 sites in 26 countries.
132 sites in 26 countries
United States20 sites
Study site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131-5636
Study site
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Study site
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Study site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267-0562
Study site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Study site
Detroit, Michigan, 48202-2689
Study site
Gainsville, Florida, 32605
Study site
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Study site
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033-0850
Study site
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
Study site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205-7199
Study site
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Study site
Miami, Florida, 33176
Study site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114
Study site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
Study site
Plantation, Florida, 33324
Study site
Rochester, New York, 14642
Study site
Santa Fe, New Mexico, 87505
Study site
Scarborough, Maine, 04074
Study site
Vallejo, California, 94589
Russia13 sites
Study site
Barnaul, 656049
Study site
Izhevsk, 426009
Study site
Kazan', 420029
Study site
Krasnodar, 350080
Study site
Moscow, 107005
Study site
Moscow, 115478
Study site
Moscow, 117837
Study site
Moscow, 121356
Study site
Moscow, 125284
Study site
Saint Petersburg, 189646
Study site
Saint Petersburg, 197022
Study site
Saint Petersburg, 197758
Study site
Ufa, 450054
United Kingdom11 sites
Study site
Cardiff, CF14 2TL
Study site
Edinburgh, EH4 2XU
Study site
Guildford, GU2 7XX
Study site
Ipswich, IP4 5PD
Study site
London, NW3 2QG
Study site
London, SE1 9RT
Study site
Manchester, M20 4BX
Study site
Merseyside, CH63 45Y
Study site
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 6BE
Study site
Southampton, SO16 6YD
Study site
Swansea, SA2 8QA
Canada9 sites
Study site
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2
Study site
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
Study site
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4
Study site
Oshawa, Ontario, L1G 2B9
Study site
Québec, Quebec, G1S 4L8
Study site
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
Study site
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
Study site
Victoria, British Columbia, V8R 6V5
Study site
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0V9
India9 sites
Study site
Ahmedabad, 380 016
Study site
Bangalore, 560 029
Study site
Chennai, 600 020
Study site
Cuttack, 753 007
Study site
Ludhiana, 141 001
Study site
Mumbai, 400012
Study site
New Delhi, 110 029
Study site
New Delhi, 110 060
Study site
New Delhi, 110085
Spain9 sites
Study site
Barcelona, 08036
Study site
Córdoba, 14004
Study site
Girona, 17007
Study site
Madrid, 28007
Study site
Madrid, 28034
Study site
Madrid, 28041
Study site
Mataró, 08304
Study site
Reus, 43204
Study site
Valencia, 46009
Poland8 sites
Study site
Bialystok, 15-027
Study site
Bydgoszcz, 85-796
Study site
Gliwice, 44-101
Study site
Krakow, 31-115
Study site
Lodz, 94-306
Study site
Szczecin, 71-730
Study site
Warsaw, 00-909
Study site
Warsaw, 02-781
Israel6 sites
Study site
Haifa, 31096
Study site
Haifa, 34362
Study site
Petah Tikva, 49100
Study site
Ramat Gan, 52621
Study site
Rehovot, 76100
Study site
Tel Aviv, 64239
Turkey (Türkiye)6 sites
Study site
Ankara, 06230
Study site
Ankara, 06500
Study site
Istanbul, 34300
Study site
Istanbul, 34390
Study site
Izmir, 35100
Study site
Shhiye, Ankara, 06100
Ukraine6 sites
Study site
Kiev, 03022
Study site
Kiev
Study site
Lviv, 79031
Study site
Odesa, 65055
Study site
Sumy, 40005
Study site
Zaporizhzhya, 69104
China5 sites
Study site
Beijing, 100021
Study site
Beijing, 100071
Study site
Shanghai, 200025
Study site
Shanghai, 200032
Study site
Wuhan, 430030
Germany4 sites
Study site
Frankfurt, 60596
Study site
Kiel, 24105
Study site
München, 80637
Study site
Trier, 54290
Sweden4 sites
Study site
Borås, 50182
Study site
Gaelve, 80187
Study site
Örebro, 701 85
Study site
Stockholm, 17176
Australia3 sites
Study site
Box Hill, 3128
Study site
Darlinghurst, 2010
Study site
Waratah, 2298
Bulgaria3 sites
Study site
Plovdiv, 4000
Study site
Sofia, 1527
Study site
Stara Zagora, 8000
Netherlands2 sites
Study site
Amsterdam, 1081 HV
Study site
Rotterdam, 3075 EA
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Open-label Study of the Effect of Herceptin Plus Arimidex Compared With Arimidex Alone on Progression-free Survival in Patients With HER2-positive and Hormone-receptor Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
This 2 arm study assessed the safety and efficacy of adding intravenous trastuzumab (Herceptin®) to daily oral anastrozole (Arimidex®) tablets as first- and second-line treatment in postmenopausal patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) overexpressing metastatic breast cancer (ER+ve and/or PR+ve). Patients were randomized to receive either anastrazole 1 mg per os (po) daily, or anastrazole 1 mg po daily + a loading dose of Herceptin® 4 mg/kg intravenous (iv) followed by weekly doses of Herceptin® 2 mg/kg iv. The anticipated time on study treatment was until disease progression, and the target sample size was 100-500 individuals.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- trastuzumab (Herceptin®), anastrazole (Arimidex®)
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
trastuzumab (Herceptin®)Drug
Also called Herceptin®
4mg/kg iv loading dose, followed by 2mg/kg iv weekly
anastrazole (Arimidex®)Drug
Also called Arimidex®
1 mg tablet taken orally daily
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| trastuzumab + anastrozole | Experimental | Trastuzumab 4 mg/kg loading dose intravenous (iv) over 90 minutes, followed by weekly doses of 2 mg/kg iv over 30 minutes plus 1 mg oral dose of anastrozole every day for 24 Months in the Main phase and in the Extension Phase. Receives: Drug: trastuzumab (Herceptin®); Drug: anastrazole (Arimidex®) |
| anastrozole | Active comparator | 1 mg oral dose of anastrozole every day for 24 Months in the Main phase. In the Extension Phase participants could cross-over to also receive trastuzumab 4 mg/kg initial loading dose intravenous (iv) over 90 minutes, followed by weekly doses of 2 mg/kg iv over 30 minutes. Receives: Drug: anastrazole (Arimidex®) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was assessed by the investigator based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria using radiographic tumor evaluations. Disease progression was defined as the appearance of any new lesion not previously identified or an estimated increase of 25% or more in existent bidimensionally or unidimensionally measurable lesions or progression of an existing non-measurable lesion. For bidimensionally measurable malignant lesions with an area of at least 2.0 centimeters squared (cm^2) an increase of 1.0 cm^2 was required and for unidimensionally measurable lesions of 1.0 cm or less an increase of 0.5 cm was required. PFS was defined as the number of days between date of randomization and date of documented disease progression or date of death. Kaplan Meier estimates of PFS are presented.
Measured: 24 Months, End of Study (Up to 5 years)
Secondary outcomes (13)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit
Clinical Benefit was defined as stable disease for ≥ six months or complete response or partial response.
Measured: 24 Months, End of Study (Up to 5 years)
Duration of Response at 24 Months
Duration of response was defined as the number of days from the day complete response or partial response was first noted to the day of progression of disease, death or last follow-up.
Measured: 24 Months
Time to Response at 24 Months
Time to response was defined as the number of days from the day of randomization to the day complete response or partial response was first noted.
Measured: 24 Months
Overall Survival at 24 Months
Overall Survival is defined as the number of days from randomization to death.
Measured: 24 Months
Percentage of Participants With Two-Year Survival
Measured: 24 Months
Percentage of Participants With Overall Tumor Response at 24 Months
Tumor Response levels were determined by the investigator and an Independent Response Evaluation Committee and Reconciled. Overall Response was defined as either complete response or partial response.
Measured: 24 Months
Percentage of Participants With Best Tumor Response at 24 Months
Tumor Response levels were determined by the investigator and an Independent Response Evaluation Committee and Reconciled. Best Response was defined as the best response a patient achieves in the study.
Measured: 24 Months
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at Final Visit Compared to Baseline
Participants rated their performance status using the ECOG Questionnaire on the following scale: 0=Fully active, perform all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory, carry out work of a light or sedentary nature; 2=Ambulatory, capable of self-care, unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than >50% of waking hours; 3=Capable of limited self-care, confined to bed or chair >50% of waking hours; 4=Completely disabled, not capable of any self-care, totally confined to bed or chair; 5=Dead.
The percentage of participants in the following categories:
Improved: Score decrease from baseline. Unchanged: Score the same as baseline. Worse: Score increase from baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Final Visit (Up to 24 Months)
Duration of Response at End of Study
Duration of response was defined as the number of days from the day complete response or partial response was first noted to the day of progression of disease, death or last follow-up.
Measured: End of Study (Up to 5 years)
Time to Response at End of Study
Time to response was defined as the number of days from the day of randomization to the day complete response or partial response was first noted.
Measured: End of Study (Up to 5 years)
Percentage of Participants With Overall Tumor Response at End of Study
Tumor Response levels were determined by the investigator and an Independent Response Evaluation Committee and Reconciled. Overall Response was defined as either complete response or partial response.
Measured: End of Study (Up to 5 years)
Percentage of Participants With Best Tumor Response at End of Study
Tumor Response levels were determined by the investigator and an Independent Response Evaluation Committee and Reconciled. Best Response was defined as the best response a patient achieves in the study.
Measured: End of Study (Up to 5 years)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Number of participants with adverse events as a measure for safety as assessed by the collection of adverse events, laboratory tests for Hematology and Serum Chemistry, clinical assessments and cardiac monitoring.
Measured: Throughout the Study (Up to 5 years)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2001
- Primary completionOct 2009
- Study completionOct 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 208 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Genentech, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00022672
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BO16216
- Status last verified
- Jun 2013
- First submitted
- 10 Aug 2001
- Last updated
- 13 Jun 2013
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jun 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Open-label Study of the Effect of Herceptin Plus Arimidex Compared With Arimidex Alone on Progression-free Survival in Patients With HER2-positive and Hormone-receptor Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00022672
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BO16216
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 208 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Genentech, Inc.
- Study start
- Jan 2001
- Primary completion
- Oct 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Jun 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This 2 arm study assessed the safety and efficacy of adding intravenous trastuzumab (Herceptin®) to daily oral anastrozole (Arimidex®) tablets as first- and second-line treatment in postmenopausal patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) overexpressing metastatic breast cancer (ER+ve and/or PR+ve). Patients were randomized to receive either anastrazole 1 mg per os (po) daily, or anastrazole 1 mg po daily + a loading dose of Herceptin® 4 mg/kg intravenous (iv) followed by weekly doses of Herceptin® 2 mg/kg iv. The anticipated time on study treatment was until disease progression, and the target sample size was 100-500 individuals.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| trastuzumab + anastrozole | Experimental | Drug: trastuzumab (Herceptin®), Drug: anastrazole (Arimidex®)Trastuzumab 4 mg/kg loading dose intravenous (iv) over 90 minutes, followed by weekly doses of 2 mg/kg iv over 30 minutes plus 1 mg oral dose of anastrozole every day for 24 Months in the Main phase and in the Extension Phase. |
| anastrozole | Active comparator | Drug: anastrazole (Arimidex®)1 mg oral dose of anastrozole every day for 24 Months in the Main phase. In the Extension Phase participants could cross-over to also receive trastuzumab 4 mg/kg initial loading dose intravenous (iv) over 90 minutes, followed by weekly doses of 2 mg/kg iv over 30 minutes. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- postmenopausal women;
- metastatic breast cancer suitable for endocrine therapy;
- positive hormone receptor status;
- Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- patients on hormone replacement therapy;
- previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease;
- uncontrolled cardiac disease and history of cardiac failure.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| trastuzumab (Herceptin®)Also: Herceptin®4mg/kg iv loading dose, followed by 2mg/kg iv weekly | Drug | trastuzumab + anastrozole |
| anastrazole (Arimidex®)Also: Arimidex®1 mg tablet taken orally daily | Drug | anastrozole, trastuzumab + anastrozole |
Primary outcome
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: 24 Months, End of Study (Up to 5 years)
PFS was assessed by the investigator based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria using radiographic tumor evaluations. Disease progression was defined as the appearance of any new lesion not previously identified or an estimated increase of 25% or more in existent bidimensionally or unidimensionally measurable lesions or progression of an existing non-measurable lesion. For bidimensionally measurable malignant lesions with an area of at least 2.0 centimeters squared (cm^2) an increase of 1.0 cm^2 was required and for unidimensionally measurable lesions of 1.0 cm or less an increase of 0.5 cm was required. PFS was defined as the number of days between date of randomization and date of documented disease progression or date of death. Kaplan Meier estimates of PFS are presented.
13 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit
Time frame: 24 Months, End of Study (Up to 5 years)
Duration of Response at 24 Months
Time frame: 24 Months
Time to Response at 24 Months
Time frame: 24 Months
Overall Survival at 24 Months
Time frame: 24 Months
Percentage of Participants With Two-Year Survival
Time frame: 24 Months
Percentage of Participants With Overall Tumor Response at 24 Months
Time frame: 24 Months
Percentage of Participants With Best Tumor Response at 24 Months
Time frame: 24 Months
Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at Final Visit Compared to Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Final Visit (Up to 24 Months)
Duration of Response at End of Study
Time frame: End of Study (Up to 5 years)
Time to Response at End of Study
Time frame: End of Study (Up to 5 years)
Percentage of Participants With Overall Tumor Response at End of Study
Time frame: End of Study (Up to 5 years)
Percentage of Participants With Best Tumor Response at End of Study
Time frame: End of Study (Up to 5 years)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time frame: Throughout the Study (Up to 5 years)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jun 2013.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
132 sites in 26 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing trastuzumab (Herceptin®) and anastrazole (Arimidex®) in people with Breast Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 132 sites in 26 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jun 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 132 sites in United States, Russia, United Kingdom, Canada, India and 21 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Jun 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression Free Survival (PFS) (time frame: 24 Months, End of Study (Up to 5 years)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jun 2013.