LymphomaPhase 3NCT00017290
Combination Chemotherapy Followed By Vaccine Therapy Plus Sargramostim in Treating Patients With Stage III or Stage IV Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
A Phase 3 study testing autologous immunoglobulin idiotype-KLH conjugate vaccine, keyhole limpet hemocyanin and sargramostim in people with Lymphoma, run by Genitope Corporation at 24 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Vaccines may make the body build an immune response to kill cancer cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lymphoma
- What is being tested?
- autologous immunoglobulin idiotype-KLH conjugate vaccine, keyhole limpet hemocyanin and sargramostim
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- 24 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Nov 2000to not given
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically confirmed stage III or IV follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
- At least 1 bidimensionally measurable lesion by radiography, in addition to lesion removed for biopsy
- No clinical evidence of CNS involvement
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
- 18 and over
Performance status:
- ECOG 0-2
Life expectancy:
- Not specified
Hematopoietic:
- WBC greater than 1,500/mm^3
- Platelet count greater than 100,000/mm^3
Hepatic:
- Bilirubin less than 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Hepatitis B surface antigen negative
- Hepatitis C antibody negative
Renal:
- Creatinine less than 1.5 times ULN
Other:
- No other malignancy within the past 5 years except adequately treated basal or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
- No history of autoimmune disease
- HIV negative
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy:
- No prior antibody therapy for lymphoma
Chemotherapy:
- No prior cytotoxic therapy for lymphoma
Endocrine therapy:
- No prior corticosteroids for lymphoma
- At least 12 months since prior corticosteroids or immunosuppressants for other conditions
- Prior transient corticosteroids (prior to CT imaging) or optical solutions allowed
Radiotherapy:
- Prior radiotherapy for lymphoma (no more than 2 sites of limited disease) allowed
Surgery:
- See Disease Characteristics
Other:
- No concurrent participation in other therapeutic clinical trial
Trial locations and contacts
24 sites in 2 countries.
24 sites in 2 countries
United States21 sites
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Ann Arbor
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105-2399
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-0942
Greenebaum Cancer Center at University of Maryland Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231
Mountain States Tumor Institute - Boise
Boise, Idaho, 83712
Rush Cancer Institute at Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital - Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210-1240
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers - Midtown
Denver, Colorado, 80218
SuperGen, Incorporated
Dublin, California, 94568
Shands Cancer Center at the University of Florida Health Science Center
Gainesville, Florida, 32610-0277
California Cancer Care, Inc.
Greenbrae, California, 94904
Cancer Center at Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Indiana University Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242-1009
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1781
Sarah Cannon Cancer Center at Centennial Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
New York Weill Cornell Cancer Center at Cornell University
New York, New York, 10021
UNMC Eppley Cancer Center at the University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198-7680
Cancer Institute at Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97201-3098
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Stanford Cancer Center at Stanford University Medical Center
Stanford, California, 94305-5151
Canada3 sites
Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
British Columbia Cancer Agency
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Trial To Evaluate The Safety And Efficacy Of Specific Immunotherapy, Recombinant Idiotype Conjugated To KLH With GM-CSF, Compared To Non-Specific Immunotherapy, KLH With GM-CSF, In Patients With Follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Vaccines may make the body build an immune response to kill cancer cells. It is not yet known which regimen of chemotherapy combined with vaccine therapy is more effective for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to determine the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy followed by vaccine therapy plus sargramostim in treating patients who have stage III or stage IV non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the time to tumor progression in patients with stage III or IV follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with cyclophosphamide, prednisone, and vincristine followed by immunotherapy with keyhole limpet hemocyanin with or without autologous tumor-derived immunoglobulin idiotype and adjuvant sargramostim (GM-CSF).
- Compare the efficacy of these immunotherapy regimens in terms of converting patients with partial response or unconfirmed complete response to clinical complete response.
- Compare the safety and toxic effects of these immunotherapy regimens in this patient population.
- Compare the time to treatment failure and survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Correlate the induction of idiotype-specific immune response with clinical benefits of achieving molecular remission in these patients.
- Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study.
Patients receive cyclophosphamide IV over 30-40 minutes and vincristine IV on day 1. Patients also receive oral prednisone on days 1-5. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 8 courses.
At 6 months after completion of chemotherapy, patients maintaining partial response (PR), complete response (CR), or unconfirmed complete response (CRU) receive immunotherapy. Patients are stratified according to participating center and baseline disease status (PR vs CR/CRU). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive autologous tumor-derived immunoglobulin idiotype conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) subcutaneously (SC) on day 1 and adjuvant sargramostim (GM-CSF) SC on days 1-4 of weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.
- Arm II: Patients receive KLH alone SC on day 1 and GM-CSF SC on days 1-4 of weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.
Quality of life is assessed prior to first immunization, at 2-8 weeks after completion of immunizations, and then every 6 months for 30 months.
Patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year and then every 6 months thereafter. Patients also enroll in a long-term follow-up study for an additional 5 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 360 patients (240 in arm I and 120 in arm II) will be accrued from the 480 patients biopsied for this study within 15-18 months.
- Conditions
- Lymphoma
- Being tested
- autologous immunoglobulin idiotype-KLH conjugate vaccine, keyhole limpet hemocyanin, sargramostim, cyclophosphamide, prednisone
- Keywords
- stage III grade 1 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 2 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 3 follicular lymphoma, stage IV grade 1 follicular lymphoma, stage IV grade 2 follicular lymphoma, stage IV grade 3 follicular lymphoma
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Lymphoma, Follicular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
autologous immunoglobulin idiotype-KLH conjugate vaccineBiological
keyhole limpet hemocyaninBiological
sargramostimBiological
cyclophosphamideDrug
prednisoneDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2000
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- Double blind
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Genitope Corporation
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- David Hinds, Study chair, Genitope Corporation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00017290
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000068673
- Other IDs
- GENITOPE-G2000-03, CUMC-0101-142, UCLA-0010061
- Status last verified
- Aug 2002
- First submitted
- 6 Jun 2001
- Last updated
- 4 Dec 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Levy R, Ganjoo KN, Leonard JP, Vose JM, Flinn IW, Ambinder RF, Connors JM, Berinstein NL, Belch AR, Bartlett NL, Nichols C, Emmanouilides CE, Timmerman JM, Gregory SA, Link BK, Inwards DJ, Freedman AS, Matous JV, Robertson MJ, Kunkel LA, Ingolia DE, Gentles AJ, Liu CL, Tibshirani R, Alizadeh AA, Denney DW Jr. Active idiotypic vaccination versus control immunotherapy for follicular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun 10;32(17):1797-803. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.9273. Epub 2014 May 5.
PubMed 24799467
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Dec 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Trial To Evaluate The Safety And Efficacy Of Specific Immunotherapy, Recombinant Idiotype Conjugated To KLH With GM-CSF, Compared To Non-Specific Immunotherapy, KLH With GM-CSF, In Patients With Follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00017290
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000068673
- Conditions
- Lymphoma
- Keywords
- stage III grade 1 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 2 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 3 follicular lymphoma, stage IV grade 1 follicular lymphoma, stage IV grade 2 follicular lymphoma, stage IV grade 3 follicular lymphoma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Lead sponsor
- Genitope CorporationIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2000
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Vaccines may make the body build an immune response to kill cancer cells. It is not yet known which regimen of chemotherapy combined with vaccine therapy is more effective for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to determine the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy followed by vaccine therapy plus sargramostim in treating patients who have stage III or stage IV non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the time to tumor progression in patients with stage III or IV follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with cyclophosphamide, prednisone, and vincristine followed by immunotherapy with keyhole limpet hemocyanin with or without autologous tumor-derived immunoglobulin idiotype and adjuvant sargramostim (GM-CSF).
- Compare the efficacy of these immunotherapy regimens in terms of converting patients with partial response or unconfirmed complete response to clinical complete response.
- Compare the safety and toxic effects of these immunotherapy regimens in this patient population.
- Compare the time to treatment failure and survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Correlate the induction of idiotype-specific immune response with clinical benefits of achieving molecular remission in these patients.
- Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study.
Patients receive cyclophosphamide IV over 30-40 minutes and vincristine IV on day 1. Patients also receive oral prednisone on days 1-5. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 8 courses.
At 6 months after completion of chemotherapy, patients maintaining partial response (PR), complete response (CR), or unconfirmed complete response (CRU) receive immunotherapy. Patients are stratified according to participating center and baseline disease status (PR vs CR/CRU). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive autologous tumor-derived immunoglobulin idiotype conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) subcutaneously (SC) on day 1 and adjuvant sargramostim (GM-CSF) SC on days 1-4 of weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.
- Arm II: Patients receive KLH alone SC on day 1 and GM-CSF SC on days 1-4 of weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.
Quality of life is assessed prior to first immunization, at 2-8 weeks after completion of immunizations, and then every 6 months for 30 months.
Patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year and then every 6 months thereafter. Patients also enroll in a long-term follow-up study for an additional 5 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 360 patients (240 in arm I and 120 in arm II) will be accrued from the 480 patients biopsied for this study within 15-18 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- Double blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| autologous immunoglobulin idiotype-KLH conjugate vaccine | Biological | – |
| keyhole limpet hemocyanin | Biological | – |
| sargramostim | Biological | – |
| cyclophosphamide | Drug | – |
| prednisone | Drug | – |
| vincristine sulfate | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Dec 2013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24799467Levy R, Ganjoo KN, Leonard JP, Vose JM, Flinn IW, Ambinder RF, Connors JM, Berinstein NL, Belch AR, Bartlett NL, Nichols C, Emmanouilides CE, Timmerman JM, Gregory SA, Link BK, Inwards DJ, Freedman AS, Matous JV, Robertson MJ, Kunkel LA, Ingolia DE, Gentles AJ, Liu CL, Tibshirani R, Alizadeh AA, Denney DW Jr. Active idiotypic vaccination versus control immunotherapy for follicular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun 10;32(17):1797-803. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.9273. Epub 2014 May 5.
Related trials for Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Ibrutinib Combination Therapy in Transplant Ineligible Individuals With Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma
Non-hodgkin Lymphoma
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Testing the Addition of an Anti-Cancer Drug, Glofitamab, to the Usual Chemotherapy Treatment (Alternating R-CHOP/R-DHAP) for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Ann Arbor Stage II Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Ann Arbor Stage III Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Brentuximab Vedotin and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With CD30-Positive Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, ALK-Negative
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David Hinds study chair
Genitope Corporation
24 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing autologous immunoglobulin idiotype-KLH conjugate vaccine, keyhole limpet hemocyanin and sargramostim in people with Lymphoma, run by Genitope Corporation at 24 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Dec 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 24 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00017290, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Dec 2013.