Breast CancerPhase 3NCT00017095
Biomarker (p53 Gene) Analysis and Combination Chemotherapy Followed by Radiation Therapy and Surgery in Treating Women With Large Operable or Locally Advanced or Inflammatory Breast Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing filgrastim, cyclophosphamide and docetaxel in people with Breast Cancer, run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC at 39 sites in 9 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Currently patients with breast cancer are treated with one of several very similar combinations of drugs. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 70 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- filgrastim, cyclophosphamide and docetaxel
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,856 participants
- Where
- 39 sitesin 9 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 2001to Nov 2006
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 70 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically confirmed breast cancer
- Locally advanced or inflammatory disease
- T4a-d, any N, M0 OR
- Any T, N2 or N3, M0
- Large operable T2 or T3 tumors
- No bilateral breast cancer
- Frozen tumor sample available
- 1 incisional biopsy OR
- 2 trucut biopsies from a 14G needle
- Hormone receptor status:
- Not specified
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
- 70 and under
Sex:
- Female
Menopausal status:
- Not specified
Performance status:
- WHO 0-1
Life expectancy:
- Not specified
Hematopoietic:
- Neutrophil count greater than 1,500/mm^3
- Platelet count greater than 100,000/mm^3
Hepatic:
- Bilirubin less than 1.2 mg/dL
- SGOT less than 60 IU/L
Renal:
- Creatinine less than 1.35 mg/dL
Cardiovascular:
- LVEF normal by echocardiography or MUGA
Other:
- No other malignancy within the past 5 years except basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
- No serious uncontrolled medical condition
- No uncontrolled psychiatric or addictive disorders
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy:
- Not specified
Chemotherapy:
- No prior chemotherapy
Endocrine therapy:
- Not specified
Radiotherapy:
- No prior radiotherapy
Surgery:
- See Disease Characteristics
Trial locations and contacts
39 sites in 9 countries.
39 sites in 9 countries
France10 sites
Centre Paul Papin
Angers, 49036
Institut Bergonie
Bordeaux, 33076
Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Georges-Francois Leclerc
Dijon, 21079
Centre Hospitalier Departemental
La Roche-sur-Yon, F-85025
Centre Regional de Lutte Contre le Cancer - Centre Val d'Aurelle
Montpellier, 34298
Centre Regional Rene Gauducheau
Nantes-Saint Herblain, 44805
Centre Henri Becquerel
Rouen, 76038
Centre Rene Huguenin
Saint-Cloud, 92211
Centre Paul Strauss
Strasbourg, 67085
Centre Alexis Vautrin
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
Sweden7 sites
Sahlgrenska University Hospital at Gothenburg University
Gothenburg (Goteborg), S-413 45
Lund University Hospital
Lund, S-22185
Malmo University Hospital
Malmö, S-20502
Sahlgrenska University Hospital - Molndal at Gothenburg University
Mölndal, S-43180
Orebro University Hospital
Örebro, 70185
Karolinska University Hospital - Huddinge
Stockholm, S-171 76
Uppsala University Hospital
Uppsala, S-75185
Switzerland6 sites
Kantonspital Aarau
Aarau, 5001
Swiss Institute for Applied Cancer Research
Bern, CH-3008
Inselspital Bern
Bern, CH-3010
Hopital Cantonal Universitaire de Geneve
Geneva, CH-1211
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
Lausanne, CH-1011
UniversitaetsSpital Zuerich
Zurich, CH-8091
United Kingdom5 sites
Ninewells Hospital and Medical School
Dundee, Scotland, DD1 9SY
Edinburgh Cancer Centre at Western General Hospital
Edinburgh, Scotland, EH4 2XU
Scottish Cancer Therapy Network
Edinburgh, Scotland, EH5 3SQ
Northern Centre for Cancer Treatment at Newcastle General Hospital
Newcastle upon Tyne, England, NE4 6BE
Royal South Hants Hospital
Southampton, England, SO14 0YG
Belgium3 sites
Institut Jules Bordet
Brussels, 1000
CHU Liege - Domaine Universitaire du Sart Tilman
Liège, B-4000
Algemeen Ziekenhuis Sint-Augustinus
Wilrijk, 2610
Netherlands3 sites
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
Amsterdam, 1091 HA
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, 2300 CA
Daniel Den Hoed Cancer Center at Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, 3008 AE
Poland2 sites
Medical University of Gdansk
Gdansk, 80-211
Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology
Warsaw, 02-781
Portugal2 sites
Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (HUC)
Coimbra, 3049
Instituto Portugues de Oncologia de Francisco Gentil - Centro Regional de Oncologia de Lisboa, S.A.
Lisbon, 1099-023 Codex
About this study
Official title: First Prospective Intergroup Translational Research Trial Assessing the Potential Predictive Value of p53 Using a Functional Assay in Yeast in Patients With Locally Advanced/Inflammatory or Large Operable Breast Cancer Prospectively Randomised to a Taxane Versus a Non Taxane Regimen
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Currently patients with breast cancer are treated with one of several very similar combinations of drugs. Analysis of biomarkers in tumor tissue may help doctors predict how well patients with breast cancer will respond to treatment and help doctors choose the best drug regimen to treat each patient.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying giving different regimens of chemotherapy and comparing how well they work in treating women with large operable or locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer. This study is also looking at whether analyzing a specific biomarker (p53) in tumor tissue may help doctors predict how well patients will respond to treatment and help doctors choose the best drug to treat each patient.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare neoadjuvant fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide vs docetaxel and epirubicin followed by radiotherapy and surgery in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or large operable breast cancer.
- Assess overall differences between the two arms.
- Assess interaction between p53 status and outcomes in each arm.
- Compare the progression-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
Secondary
- Compare the distant metastasis-free survival and survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the clinical and pathological responses to these regimens in these patients.
- Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
Translational
- Determine the p53 status in order to study the treatment effect in each of the p53 subgroups and test the interaction between treatment and p53 status.
- Assess the level of agreement between p53 assessment by IHC method and functional test in yeast.
- Evaluate the prognostic and predictive value of "high risk" p53 mutations.
- Perform a survival analysis according to gene clusters defined with the use of microarrays.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to stage of disease (large T2-3 vs locally advanced or inflammatory), p53 status (negative vs positive vs unknown), and participating center. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 chemotherapy treatment arms.
- Arm I (non-taxane arm): Patients receive 1 of 3 chemotherapy regimens comprising fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) (according to participating institution).
- FEC 100: Patients receive fluorouracil IV over 15 minutes, epirubicin IV over 1 hour, and cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour on day 1. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Canadian FEC: Patients receive oral cyclophosphamide on days 1-14 and epirubicin IV and fluorouracil IV on days 1 and 8. If oral medications are not tolerated, patients may switch to cyclophosphamide IV on days 1 and 8. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Tailored FEC: Patients receive fluorouracil IV over 15 minutes, epirubicin IV over 1 hour, and cyclophosphamide IV over 1-2 hours on day 1. Patients also receive filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously on days 2-15 or until blood counts recover. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II (taxane arm): Patients receive docetaxel IV over 1 hour on days 1, 22, and 43 followed by epirubicin IV over 15 minutes and docetaxel IV over 1 hour on days 64, 85, and 106 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Following chemotherapy, patients may undergo loco-regional therapy comprising radiotherapy with or without breast conservation surgery or mastectomy. Patients with estrogen- and/or progesterone-receptor-positive disease also receive tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor for 5 years.
Two tumor samples (incisional or tricut biopsies) are taken before chemotherapy. Samples are analyzed by IHC, a functional test in yeast, and microarray analysis.
Patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year, every 4 months for 1.5 years, and then every 6 months thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 1,850 patients will be accrued for this study within 5.5 years.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- filgrastim, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel, epirubicin hydrochloride, fluorouracil
- Keywords
- stage II breast cancer, stage IIIA breast cancer, stage IIIB breast cancer, stage IIIC breast cancer, inflammatory breast cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms, Inflammatory Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
filgrastimBiological
cyclophosphamideDrug
docetaxelDrug
epirubicin hydrochlorideDrug
fluorouracilDrug
microarray analysisGenetic
laboratory biomarker analysisOther
biopsyProcedure or surgery
conventional surgeryProcedure or surgery
neoadjuvant therapyProcedure or surgery
radiation therapyRadiation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| non taxane based chemotherapy | Active comparator | either FEC 100 or Canadian CEF or Tailored FEC for 6 cycles Receives: Biological: filgrastim; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: epirubicin hydrochloride; Drug: fluorouracil; Genetic: microarray analysis; Other: immunohistochemistry staining method; Other: laboratory biomarker analysis; Procedure: biopsy; Procedure: conventional surgery; Procedure: neoadjuvant therapy; Radiation: radiation therapy |
| taxane based chemotherapy | Experimental | Docetaxel for 3 cycles followed by Epirubicin/Docetaxel for 3 cycles Receives: Drug: docetaxel; Drug: epirubicin hydrochloride; Genetic: microarray analysis; Other: immunohistochemistry staining method; Other: laboratory biomarker analysis; Procedure: biopsy; Procedure: conventional surgery; Procedure: neoadjuvant therapy; Radiation: radiation therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-free survival
Measured: from randomization till first evidence of progression
Secondary outcomes (7)
Distant metastasis-free survival
Measured: randomization till first evidence recurrence
Overall survival
Measured: randomization till death
Clinical and pathological responses
Measured: after 3rd and 6d cycle of chemotherapy
Clinical response according to RECIST criteria without pathologic response
Measured: after 3rd and 6d cycle of chemotherapy
Toxicity according to CTC v2.0
Measured: from randomization
Agreement between p53 assessment by IHC method and functional test in yeast by analyzing the correlation between p52 and tumor status after 3 and 6 cycles of chemotherapy
Measured: after 3 and 6 cycles of chemotherapy
Tumor assessment using cDNA microarray technology
Measured: end of treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2001
- Primary completionNov 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,856 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- Swedish Breast Cancer Group, Swiss Cancer Institute, Anglo Celtic Cooperative Oncology Group
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Herve Bonnefoi, Study chair, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00017095
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EORTC-10994-p53
- Other IDs
- EORTC-10994, ACCOG-EORTC-10994, SAKK-EORTC-10994, SBGC-EORTC-10994, BIG-1-00
- Status last verified
- Oct 2013
- First submitted
- 6 Jun 2001
- Last updated
- 24 Oct 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Bonnefoi H, Potti A, Delorenzi M, Mauriac L, Campone M, Tubiana-Hulin M, Petit T, Rouanet P, Jassem J, Blot E, Becette V, Farmer P, Andre S, Acharya CR, Mukherjee S, Cameron D, Bergh J, Nevins JR, Iggo RD. Retraction--Validation of gene signatures that predict the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a substudy of the EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01 clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Feb;12(2):116. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70011-0. No abstract available.
PubMed 21277543Desmedt C, Di Leo A, de Azambuja E, Larsimont D, Haibe-Kains B, Selleslags J, Delaloge S, Duhem C, Kains JP, Carly B, Maerevoet M, Vindevoghel A, Rouas G, Lallemand F, Durbecq V, Cardoso F, Salgado R, Rovere R, Bontempi G, Michiels S, Buyse M, Nogaret JM, Qi Y, Symmans F, Pusztai L, D'Hondt V, Piccart-Gebhart M, Sotiriou C. Multifactorial approach to predicting resistance to anthracyclines. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr 20;29(12):1578-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.2231. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
PubMed 21422418Bonnefoi H, Piccart M, Bogaerts J, Mauriac L, Fumoleau P, Brain E, Petit T, Rouanet P, Jassem J, Blot E, Zaman K, Cufer T, Lortholary A, Lidbrink E, Andre S, Litiere S, Lago LD, Becette V, Cameron DA, Bergh J, Iggo R; EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00 Study Investigators. TP53 status for prediction of sensitivity to taxane versus non-taxane neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer (EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jun;12(6):527-39. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70094-8. Epub 2011 May 11.
PubMed 21570352Bonnefoi HR, Bogaerts J, Piccart M, et al.: Phase III trial (EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01) assessing the value of p53 using a functional assay to predict sensitivity to a taxane versus nontaxane primary chemotherapy in breast cancer: final analysis. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 28 (Suppl 18): A-LBA503, 2010.
Collingridge D. Expression of concern--validation of gene signatures that predict the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a substudy of the EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01 clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Sep;11(9):813-4. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70185-6. Epub 2010 Jul 26. No abstract available.
PubMed 20667781Bonnefoi H, Zimmer AS, Piccart M, et al.: P53 functional assay in yeast: evaluation in 1856 patients in a large prospective clinical trial: EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01. [Abstract] 31st Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 10-14, 2008, San Antonio, Texas. A-1067, 2008.
Bonnefoi H, Potti A, Delorenzi M, Mauriac L, Campone M, Tubiana-Hulin M, Petit T, Rouanet P, Jassem J, Blot E, Becette V, Farmer P, Andre S, Acharya CR, Mukherjee S, Cameron D, Bergh J, Nevins JR, Iggo RD. Validation of gene signatures that predict the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a substudy of the EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01 clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Dec;8(12):1071-1078. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70345-5. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
PubMed 18024211Karina M, Bogaerts J, Piccart M, et al.: Preliminary safety data of the EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01 neoadjuvant trial comparing 3 cycles of docetaxel followed by 3 cycles of epirubicin-docetaxel versus 6 cycles of FEC 100 in patients with locally advanced/inflammatory or large operable breast cancer. [Abstract] Breast Cancer Res Treat 100 (Suppl 1): A-3067, S146-7, 2006.
Bonnefoi H, Farmer P, Delorenzi M, et al.: Is there a regimen-specific gene signature predicting for pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in hormone-negative breast cancer patients? A microarray substudy of 101 patients included in EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01 trial. [Abstract] Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 94 (Suppl 1): A-1040, 2005.
Farmer P, Iggo R, Becette V, et al.: High quality gene expression microarray data from a multicentre prospective trial: results of the first microarray analysis in the EORTC 10994/ BIG 00-01 study. [Abstract] Eur J Cancer 2 (Suppl 3): A-155, 99, 2004.
Chatzipli A, Bonnefoi H, MacGrogan G, Sentis J, Cameron D, Poncet C; EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00 Consortium; Iggo R. Patterns of genomic change in residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2021 Nov;125(10):1356-1364. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01526-3. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
PubMed 34480095Bonnefoi H, Litiere S, Piccart M, MacGrogan G, Fumoleau P, Brain E, Petit T, Rouanet P, Jassem J, Moldovan C, Bodmer A, Zaman K, Cufer T, Campone M, Luporsi E, Malmstrom P, Werutsky G, Bogaerts J, Bergh J, Cameron DA; EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00 Study investigators. Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an independent predictive factor irrespective of simplified breast cancer intrinsic subtypes: a landmark and two-step approach analyses from the EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00 phase III trial. Ann Oncol. 2014 Jun;25(6):1128-36. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu118. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
PubMed 24618153
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Oct 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- First Prospective Intergroup Translational Research Trial Assessing the Potential Predictive Value of p53 Using a Functional Assay in Yeast in Patients With Locally Advanced/Inflammatory or Large Operable Breast Cancer Prospectively Randomised to a Taxane Versus a Non Taxane Regimen
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00017095
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EORTC-10994-p53
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- stage II breast cancer, stage IIIA breast cancer, stage IIIB breast cancer, stage IIIC breast cancer, inflammatory breast cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,856 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTCResearch network
- Collaborators
- Swedish Breast Cancer Group, Swiss Cancer Institute, Anglo Celtic Cooperative Oncology Group
- Study start
- Mar 2001
- Primary completion
- Nov 2006 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Currently patients with breast cancer are treated with one of several very similar combinations of drugs. Analysis of biomarkers in tumor tissue may help doctors predict how well patients with breast cancer will respond to treatment and help doctors choose the best drug regimen to treat each patient.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying giving different regimens of chemotherapy and comparing how well they work in treating women with large operable or locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer. This study is also looking at whether analyzing a specific biomarker (p53) in tumor tissue may help doctors predict how well patients will respond to treatment and help doctors choose the best drug to treat each patient.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare neoadjuvant fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide vs docetaxel and epirubicin followed by radiotherapy and surgery in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or large operable breast cancer.
- Assess overall differences between the two arms.
- Assess interaction between p53 status and outcomes in each arm.
- Compare the progression-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
Secondary
- Compare the distant metastasis-free survival and survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the clinical and pathological responses to these regimens in these patients.
- Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
Translational
- Determine the p53 status in order to study the treatment effect in each of the p53 subgroups and test the interaction between treatment and p53 status.
- Assess the level of agreement between p53 assessment by IHC method and functional test in yeast.
- Evaluate the prognostic and predictive value of "high risk" p53 mutations.
- Perform a survival analysis according to gene clusters defined with the use of microarrays.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to stage of disease (large T2-3 vs locally advanced or inflammatory), p53 status (negative vs positive vs unknown), and participating center. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 chemotherapy treatment arms.
- Arm I (non-taxane arm): Patients receive 1 of 3 chemotherapy regimens comprising fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) (according to participating institution).
- FEC 100: Patients receive fluorouracil IV over 15 minutes, epirubicin IV over 1 hour, and cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour on day 1. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Canadian FEC: Patients receive oral cyclophosphamide on days 1-14 and epirubicin IV and fluorouracil IV on days 1 and 8. If oral medications are not tolerated, patients may switch to cyclophosphamide IV on days 1 and 8. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Tailored FEC: Patients receive fluorouracil IV over 15 minutes, epirubicin IV over 1 hour, and cyclophosphamide IV over 1-2 hours on day 1. Patients also receive filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously on days 2-15 or until blood counts recover. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II (taxane arm): Patients receive docetaxel IV over 1 hour on days 1, 22, and 43 followed by epirubicin IV over 15 minutes and docetaxel IV over 1 hour on days 64, 85, and 106 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Following chemotherapy, patients may undergo loco-regional therapy comprising radiotherapy with or without breast conservation surgery or mastectomy. Patients with estrogen- and/or progesterone-receptor-positive disease also receive tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor for 5 years.
Two tumor samples (incisional or tricut biopsies) are taken before chemotherapy. Samples are analyzed by IHC, a functional test in yeast, and microarray analysis.
Patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year, every 4 months for 1.5 years, and then every 6 months thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 1,850 patients will be accrued for this study within 5.5 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| non taxane based chemotherapy | Active comparator | Biological: filgrastim, Drug: cyclophosphamide, Drug: epirubicin hydrochloride, Drug: fluorouracil, Genetic: microarray analysis, Other: immunohistochemistry staining method, Other: laboratory biomarker analysis, Procedure: biopsy, Procedure: conventional surgery, Procedure: neoadjuvant therapy, Radiation: radiation therapyeither FEC 100 or Canadian CEF or Tailored FEC for 6 cycles |
| taxane based chemotherapy | Experimental | Drug: docetaxel, Drug: epirubicin hydrochloride, Genetic: microarray analysis, Other: immunohistochemistry staining method, Other: laboratory biomarker analysis, Procedure: biopsy, Procedure: conventional surgery, Procedure: neoadjuvant therapy, Radiation: radiation therapyDocetaxel for 3 cycles followed by Epirubicin/Docetaxel for 3 cycles |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 70 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| filgrastim | Biological | non taxane based chemotherapy |
| cyclophosphamide | Drug | non taxane based chemotherapy |
| docetaxel | Drug | taxane based chemotherapy |
| epirubicin hydrochloride | Drug | non taxane based chemotherapy, taxane based chemotherapy |
| fluorouracil | Drug | non taxane based chemotherapy |
| microarray analysis | Genetic | non taxane based chemotherapy, taxane based chemotherapy |
| immunohistochemistry staining method | Other | non taxane based chemotherapy, taxane based chemotherapy |
| laboratory biomarker analysis | Other | non taxane based chemotherapy, taxane based chemotherapy |
| biopsy | Procedure or surgery | non taxane based chemotherapy, taxane based chemotherapy |
| conventional surgery | Procedure or surgery | non taxane based chemotherapy, taxane based chemotherapy |
| neoadjuvant therapy | Procedure or surgery | non taxane based chemotherapy, taxane based chemotherapy |
| radiation therapy | Radiation | non taxane based chemotherapy, taxane based chemotherapy |
Primary outcome
Progression-free survival
Time frame: from randomization till first evidence of progression
7 secondary outcomes
Distant metastasis-free survival
Time frame: randomization till first evidence recurrence
Overall survival
Time frame: randomization till death
Clinical and pathological responses
Time frame: after 3rd and 6d cycle of chemotherapy
Clinical response according to RECIST criteria without pathologic response
Time frame: after 3rd and 6d cycle of chemotherapy
Toxicity according to CTC v2.0
Time frame: from randomization
Agreement between p53 assessment by IHC method and functional test in yeast by analyzing the correlation between p52 and tumor status after 3 and 6 cycles of chemotherapy
Time frame: after 3 and 6 cycles of chemotherapy
Tumor assessment using cDNA microarray technology
Time frame: end of treatment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Oct 2013.
- Background: PubMed 21277543Bonnefoi H, Potti A, Delorenzi M, Mauriac L, Campone M, Tubiana-Hulin M, Petit T, Rouanet P, Jassem J, Blot E, Becette V, Farmer P, Andre S, Acharya CR, Mukherjee S, Cameron D, Bergh J, Nevins JR, Iggo RD. Retraction--Validation of gene signatures that predict the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a substudy of the EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01 clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Feb;12(2):116. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70011-0. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 21422418Desmedt C, Di Leo A, de Azambuja E, Larsimont D, Haibe-Kains B, Selleslags J, Delaloge S, Duhem C, Kains JP, Carly B, Maerevoet M, Vindevoghel A, Rouas G, Lallemand F, Durbecq V, Cardoso F, Salgado R, Rovere R, Bontempi G, Michiels S, Buyse M, Nogaret JM, Qi Y, Symmans F, Pusztai L, D'Hondt V, Piccart-Gebhart M, Sotiriou C. Multifactorial approach to predicting resistance to anthracyclines. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr 20;29(12):1578-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.2231. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
- Results publication: PubMed 21570352Bonnefoi H, Piccart M, Bogaerts J, Mauriac L, Fumoleau P, Brain E, Petit T, Rouanet P, Jassem J, Blot E, Zaman K, Cufer T, Lortholary A, Lidbrink E, Andre S, Litiere S, Lago LD, Becette V, Cameron DA, Bergh J, Iggo R; EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00 Study Investigators. TP53 status for prediction of sensitivity to taxane versus non-taxane neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer (EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jun;12(6):527-39. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70094-8. Epub 2011 May 11.
- Results publicationBonnefoi HR, Bogaerts J, Piccart M, et al.: Phase III trial (EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01) assessing the value of p53 using a functional assay to predict sensitivity to a taxane versus nontaxane primary chemotherapy in breast cancer: final analysis. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 28 (Suppl 18): A-LBA503, 2010.
- Results publication: PubMed 20667781Collingridge D. Expression of concern--validation of gene signatures that predict the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a substudy of the EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01 clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Sep;11(9):813-4. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70185-6. Epub 2010 Jul 26. No abstract available.
- Results publicationBonnefoi H, Zimmer AS, Piccart M, et al.: P53 functional assay in yeast: evaluation in 1856 patients in a large prospective clinical trial: EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01. [Abstract] 31st Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 10-14, 2008, San Antonio, Texas. A-1067, 2008.
- Results publication: PubMed 18024211Bonnefoi H, Potti A, Delorenzi M, Mauriac L, Campone M, Tubiana-Hulin M, Petit T, Rouanet P, Jassem J, Blot E, Becette V, Farmer P, Andre S, Acharya CR, Mukherjee S, Cameron D, Bergh J, Nevins JR, Iggo RD. Validation of gene signatures that predict the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a substudy of the EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01 clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Dec;8(12):1071-1078. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70345-5. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
- Results publicationKarina M, Bogaerts J, Piccart M, et al.: Preliminary safety data of the EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01 neoadjuvant trial comparing 3 cycles of docetaxel followed by 3 cycles of epirubicin-docetaxel versus 6 cycles of FEC 100 in patients with locally advanced/inflammatory or large operable breast cancer. [Abstract] Breast Cancer Res Treat 100 (Suppl 1): A-3067, S146-7, 2006.
- Results publicationBonnefoi H, Farmer P, Delorenzi M, et al.: Is there a regimen-specific gene signature predicting for pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in hormone-negative breast cancer patients? A microarray substudy of 101 patients included in EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01 trial. [Abstract] Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 94 (Suppl 1): A-1040, 2005.
- Results publicationFarmer P, Iggo R, Becette V, et al.: High quality gene expression microarray data from a multicentre prospective trial: results of the first microarray analysis in the EORTC 10994/ BIG 00-01 study. [Abstract] Eur J Cancer 2 (Suppl 3): A-155, 99, 2004.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34480095Chatzipli A, Bonnefoi H, MacGrogan G, Sentis J, Cameron D, Poncet C; EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00 Consortium; Iggo R. Patterns of genomic change in residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2021 Nov;125(10):1356-1364. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01526-3. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24618153Bonnefoi H, Litiere S, Piccart M, MacGrogan G, Fumoleau P, Brain E, Petit T, Rouanet P, Jassem J, Moldovan C, Bodmer A, Zaman K, Cufer T, Campone M, Luporsi E, Malmstrom P, Werutsky G, Bogaerts J, Bergh J, Cameron DA; EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00 Study investigators. Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an independent predictive factor irrespective of simplified breast cancer intrinsic subtypes: a landmark and two-step approach analyses from the EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00 phase III trial. Ann Oncol. 2014 Jun;25(6):1128-36. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu118. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Herve Bonnefoi study chair
Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux
39 sites in 9 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing filgrastim, cyclophosphamide and docetaxel in people with Breast Cancer, run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC at 39 sites in 9 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Oct 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 39 sites in France, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Belgium and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-free survival (time frame: from randomization till first evidence of progression). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00017095, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Oct 2013.