Vision DisorderNCT00013936
A Novel Acuity Testing Method
An observational study of Vision Disorder, run by National Eye Institute (NEI) at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this protocol is to develop a valid, reliable, better standardized, and more efficient test of visual acuity (ability to see fine details) for use in clinical trials. Recent improvements in computer video hardware permit calibration, characterization, and accurate rendering of eye-chart-quality letters. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Vision Disorder
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2001to Oct 2002
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects will include clinic patients selected with priority for those with poor visual acuity and based on maintaining smooth clinic functioning.
- Subjects will be classified into those with or without ocular disease, high refractive error, AMD, cataract, optic nerve abnormality, corneal abnormality, uveitis, glaucoma, other retinal/choroid abnormality, amblyopia, or a specified other ocular disease.
- Patients with low vision will be oversampled in order to test within a large range of possible end points.
- All subjects will have the ability to understand and sign an informed consent form obtained prior to enrollment.
- Enrolled participants will range in age from 7 years to 90 years.
Who cannot join
- Illiteracy (inability to identify letters of the Latin alphabet)
- Children younger than 7, due to cognitive inability to undergo specific tests and procedures required in the protocol.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
National Eye Institute (NEI)
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892
About this study
The purpose of this protocol is to develop a valid, reliable, better standardized, and more efficient test of visual acuity (ability to see fine details) for use in clinical trials. Recent improvements in computer video hardware permit calibration, characterization, and accurate rendering of eye-chart-quality letters. The computer can then be used to measure acuity. The modified binary search (MOBS) testing strategy is one method of computer-based testing. This study will compare the accuracy, precision, stability and utility of the MOBS technique with the eye chart method used in the National Eye Institute's Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS). The ETDRS method is currently the gold standard for acuity testing in clinical trials.
Study subjects will include NEI clinic patients between 7 and 90 years of age with or without eye disease. Eye diseases include poor visual acuity, age-related macular degeneration, cataract, optic nerve abnormality, corneal abnormality, uveitis, glaucoma, other retinal or choroid abnormality, amblyopia or other eye disease.
Participants will have their vision tested in each eye using both the ETDRS eye chart method and the MOBS method. The ETDRS method will require subjects to read all the letters on the chart until they can no longer see the details. For the MOBS method, they will read a single letter at a time that will appear on the computer screen. After reading each letter, a new letter will be presented that is either bigger or smaller in size. After completing the last acuity test, participants will fill out a questionnaire regarding their preference for one test type over the other.
Read the detailed description
The primary objective of the project is to develop a valid, reliable, better standardized and more efficient test of visual acuity for use in clinical trials. Accuracy, precision, stability, and utility of the test will be assessed for non-inferiority with Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol, the gold standard for acuity testing in clinical trials.
The experimental protocol (EVA-MOBS {Electronic Visual Acuity - Modified Binary Search}) utilizes a testing strategy that would appear to increase the efficiency and standardization of acuity threshold determination. A more efficient test is justified on the basis of reducing subject burden. Increased measurement efficiency may also reduce both subject- and tester-based bias, while allowing a better means to assess measurement stability through the collection of repeated measures data.
As part of the standard eye examination, replicated visual acuity assessments will be made during regularly-scheduled Clinic visits. Up to 500 opportunistically-sampled subjects from the National Eye Institute will be tested both with the ETDRS and EVA-MOBS protocols over a 12 month study period. Similar testing will take place at two other institutions (Devers Eye Institute, Portland, OR; The Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, TX) and the data from all three institutions will be combined and analyzed at the JAEB Center (Tampa, FL). Subjects will range in age from 7 years to 90 years and will be classified by clinical diagnosis (normal, high refractive error, age-related macular degeneration, cataract, optic nerve abnormality, corneal abnormality, uveitis, glaucoma, retinal/choroid abnormality, amblyopia and other criteria). First, those with poor acuity will be oversampled by increasing the chance that they will be selected for this testing. Second, patients will only be selected for this extra testing if it will not seriously delay clinic operations on any given day. Order of acuity test type will be randomized. It is estimated that up to 10 patients per day can have this testing performed without compromising clinic operations.
The experimental protocol runs on a Palm handheld that is used to provide instructions to the tester, record the subject's responses, and communicate with a PC/monitor at a test distance of 3 meters. Stimuli are high contrast black-and-white ETDRS letters presented on an ultra high resolution FD Trinitron monitor, that subtend 2.5 to 200 min of arc; each letter appears in isolation under equiluminant conditions, and is flanked with black bars to simulate visual crowding.
Acuity scores will be compared, with the ETDRS score serving as the reference standard. Stability of the acuity estimates from the EVA-MOBS protocol will be assessed with data from repeated measures. A short questionnaire will be administered, following the last acuity test, to determine whether a test type preference exists.
If results indicate that the protocol is well tolerated by clinical populations and that thresholds are accurate, precise, and stable, the method will be standardized for use in future trials. Use of stimuli to test visual resolution acuity, such as the Landolt-C, may subsequently be evaluated.
- Conditions
- Vision Disorder
- Keywords
- Instrument Development, Psychophysical Methods, ETDRS, Computer-Based Methods, Validation Study, Visual Acuity, Vision Tests/Instrumentation, Psychophysics, Modified Binary Search, Visual Acuity Test
- Medical subject headings
- Vision Disorders
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Apr 2001 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2001
- Study completionOct 2002
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Vision DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrolment
- 500 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Eye Institute (NEI)
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00013936
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 010136
- Other IDs
- 01-EI-0136
- Status last verified
- Oct 2002
- First submitted
- 3 Apr 2001
- Last updated
- 4 Mar 2008
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997 Feb;38(2):413-25.
PubMed 9040475Ferris FL 3rd, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, Bailey I. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982 Jul;94(1):91-6.
PubMed 7091289
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Mar 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Novel Acuity Testing Method
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00013936
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 010136
- Conditions
- Vision Disorder
- Keywords
- Instrument Development, Psychophysical Methods, ETDRS, Computer-Based Methods, Validation Study, Visual Acuity, Vision Tests/Instrumentation, Psychophysics
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 500 participants
- Lead sponsor
- National Eye Institute (NEI)US National Institutes of Health
- Study start
- Mar 2001
- Study completion
- Oct 2002
- First posted
- 4 Apr 2001 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this protocol is to develop a valid, reliable, better standardized, and more efficient test of visual acuity (ability to see fine details) for use in clinical trials. Recent improvements in computer video hardware permit calibration, characterization, and accurate rendering of eye-chart-quality letters. The computer can then be used to measure acuity. The modified binary search (MOBS) testing strategy is one method of computer-based testing. This study will compare the accuracy, precision, stability and utility of the MOBS technique with the eye chart method used in the National Eye Institute's Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS). The ETDRS method is currently the gold standard for acuity testing in clinical trials.
Study subjects will include NEI clinic patients between 7 and 90 years of age with or without eye disease. Eye diseases include poor visual acuity, age-related macular degeneration, cataract, optic nerve abnormality, corneal abnormality, uveitis, glaucoma, other retinal or choroid abnormality, amblyopia or other eye disease.
Participants will have their vision tested in each eye using both the ETDRS eye chart method and the MOBS method. The ETDRS method will require subjects to read all the letters on the chart until they can no longer see the details. For the MOBS method, they will read a single letter at a time that will appear on the computer screen. After reading each letter, a new letter will be presented that is either bigger or smaller in size. After completing the last acuity test, participants will fill out a questionnaire regarding their preference for one test type over the other.
Detailed description
The primary objective of the project is to develop a valid, reliable, better standardized and more efficient test of visual acuity for use in clinical trials. Accuracy, precision, stability, and utility of the test will be assessed for non-inferiority with Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol, the gold standard for acuity testing in clinical trials.
The experimental protocol (EVA-MOBS {Electronic Visual Acuity - Modified Binary Search}) utilizes a testing strategy that would appear to increase the efficiency and standardization of acuity threshold determination. A more efficient test is justified on the basis of reducing subject burden. Increased measurement efficiency may also reduce both subject- and tester-based bias, while allowing a better means to assess measurement stability through the collection of repeated measures data.
As part of the standard eye examination, replicated visual acuity assessments will be made during regularly-scheduled Clinic visits. Up to 500 opportunistically-sampled subjects from the National Eye Institute will be tested both with the ETDRS and EVA-MOBS protocols over a 12 month study period. Similar testing will take place at two other institutions (Devers Eye Institute, Portland, OR; The Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, TX) and the data from all three institutions will be combined and analyzed at the JAEB Center (Tampa, FL). Subjects will range in age from 7 years to 90 years and will be classified by clinical diagnosis (normal, high refractive error, age-related macular degeneration, cataract, optic nerve abnormality, corneal abnormality, uveitis, glaucoma, retinal/choroid abnormality, amblyopia and other criteria). First, those with poor acuity will be oversampled by increasing the chance that they will be selected for this testing. Second, patients will only be selected for this extra testing if it will not seriously delay clinic operations on any given day. Order of acuity test type will be randomized. It is estimated that up to 10 patients per day can have this testing performed without compromising clinic operations.
The experimental protocol runs on a Palm handheld that is used to provide instructions to the tester, record the subject's responses, and communicate with a PC/monitor at a test distance of 3 meters. Stimuli are high contrast black-and-white ETDRS letters presented on an ultra high resolution FD Trinitron monitor, that subtend 2.5 to 200 min of arc; each letter appears in isolation under equiluminant conditions, and is flanked with black bars to simulate visual crowding.
Acuity scores will be compared, with the ETDRS score serving as the reference standard. Stability of the acuity estimates from the EVA-MOBS protocol will be assessed with data from repeated measures. A short questionnaire will be administered, following the last acuity test, to determine whether a test type preference exists.
If results indicate that the protocol is well tolerated by clinical populations and that thresholds are accurate, precise, and stable, the method will be standardized for use in future trials. Use of stimuli to test visual resolution acuity, such as the Landolt-C, may subsequently be evaluated.
Study design
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Subjects will include clinic patients selected with priority for those with poor visual acuity and based on maintaining smooth clinic functioning.
- Subjects will be classified into those with or without ocular disease, high refractive error, AMD, cataract, optic nerve abnormality, corneal abnormality, uveitis, glaucoma, other retinal/choroid abnormality, amblyopia, or a specified other ocular disease.
- Patients with low vision will be oversampled in order to test within a large range of possible end points.
- All subjects will have the ability to understand and sign an informed consent form obtained prior to enrollment.
- Enrolled participants will range in age from 7 years to 90 years.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Illiteracy (inability to identify letters of the Latin alphabet)
- Children younger than 7, due to cognitive inability to undergo specific tests and procedures required in the protocol.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Mar 2008.
- Background: PubMed 9040475Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997 Feb;38(2):413-25.
- Background: PubMed 7091289Ferris FL 3rd, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, Bailey I. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982 Jul;94(1):91-6.
Related trials for Vision Disorder
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Impact of Glaucoma and Visual Field Loss on Life Space
Primary Open-angle Glaucoma
Recruiting
Trial Comparing miLOOP Device Assisted Phacoemulsification vs Standard Surgery for Dense Cataracts: Effects on Endothelial Cell Loss, Energy Use, and Vision Recovery
Cataract, Endothelial Cell Density
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Long-Term Follow-up Study of ADVM-022 in DME (INFINITY-EXT)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Diabetic Retinopathy
RecruitingPhase 2
The Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Clinical Trial Platform
Progressive Supranuclear Palsy(PSP)
RecruitingObservational study
Early Risk Stratification of Thyroid Eye Disease in Newly Diagnosed Graves' Disease
Graves' Orbitopathy, Thyroid Eye Disease, TED
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Vision Disorder, run by National Eye Institute (NEI) at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00013936, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2008.