AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiovascular DiseasesNCT00011180

Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism in the Community

An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Thromboembolism, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the trends in the incidence of venous thromboembolism, to determine the risk factors for venous thromboembolism in patients with medical and surgical illness, and to evaluate the efficacy of the anticoagulant therapy in reducing venous thromboembolism. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Cardiovascular Diseases, Thromboembolism
How many people
385 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2001to May 2009
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Using the data resouces of the Rochester Epidemiology Project, we will update the 1966-1995 inception cohort to include Olmsted County, Minnesota residents with with a first-lifetime deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) during the five year period, 1996-2000. All subjects will be followed forward in time through their linked medical records in the community (retrospective cohort study), until death or the most recent clinical contact. For each subject, all inpatient and outpatient medical records of any local health care provider will be searched for vital status at last clinical contact. For deceased patients, all death certificates will be reviewed regardless of the patient location at death. We also identified two Olmsted County residents (controls) without VTE matched by age and gender to each definite or probable case within the 1996-2000 cohort to perform a case-control study.

No eligibility criteria

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Subtherapeutic Heparin Anticoagulation as a Predictor of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism: A Population-Based Cohort Study

To evaluate the trends in the incidence of venous thromboembolism, to determine the risk factors for venous thromboembolism in patients with medical and surgical illness, and to evaluate the efficacy of the anticoagulant therapy in reducing venous thromboembolism.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs frequently among patients hospitalized for major surgery or hospitalized for a medical illness primarily due to prolonged duration of immobilization. However, many patients undergo major surgery without any occurrence of VTE. Standard prophylactic therapy after surgery is heparin, which reduces the risk of VTE. However, heparin is associated with bleeding complications. Thus, it would be desirable to identify patients at high risk for VTE who might benefit the most from heparin therapy. An important focus of the study is to look at genetic factors which might play an important role in VTE incidence.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

The study is a population based, retrospective case and case-control investigation of the genetic and environmental determinants of venous thromboembolism in the Rochester Minnesota Olmsted County population. The first five years of the study had three specific aims. The first specific aim was to update the 1966-1995 inception cohort to include Olmsted County residents with VTE during the five year period, 1996-2000. The second aim was to extend the analysis of risk factors for VTE by identifying two Olmsted County residents (controls) without VTE matched by age and gender to each definite or probable case within the 1996-2000 cohort, and to obtain plasma and genomic DNA from all cases and controls and perform a case-control study. The third specific aim was to evaluate the efficacy of anticoagulant therapy to prevent VTE recurrence.

The study was extended through March, 2009 to investigate trends in the incidence of venous thromboembolism, new risk factors including lipid-lowering, beta-blocker, and ACE-inhibitor therapies, and introduction of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) therapy.

Keywords
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), Deep vein thrombosis (DVT), Pulmonary embolism (PE)
Medical subject headings
Cardiovascular Diseases, Thromboembolism, Venous Thromboembolism, Venous Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT00011180
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Incident Cohort with VTEOlmsted County, Minnesota residents with with a first-lifetime deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) during the five year period, 1996-2000.
Controls without VTETwo Olmsted County, Minnesota residents without venous thromboembolism (VTE) were matched by age and gender to each definite or probable case of VTE within the 1996-2000 cohort.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean time interval between commencing unfractionated heparin therapy and achieving a therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)

    The time interval (minutes) was measured retrospectively, using the electronic medical record for each subject.

    Measured: Day 1 in hospital

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Feb 2001 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2001
  3. Primary completionMay 2009
  4. Study completionMay 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
385 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00011180
Sponsor's protocol ID
864-98
Other IDs
R01HL066216
Status last verified
Dec 2012
First submitted
13 Feb 2001
Last updated
6 Dec 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Heit JA. Mapping out the future in venous thromboembolism and acute coronary syndromes. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2002 Aug;28 Suppl 3:33-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-34073.

    PubMed 12232821
  • Heit JA. Venous thromboembolism epidemiology: implications for prevention and management. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2002 Jun;28 Suppl 2:3-13. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32312.

    PubMed 12073175
  • Heit JA, O'Fallon WM, Petterson TM, Lohse CM, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN, Melton LJ 3rd. Relative impact of risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Jun 10;162(11):1245-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.11.1245.

    PubMed 12038942
  • Heit JA. Perioperative management of the chronically anticoagulated patient. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2001 Sep;12(1):81-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1012746729537.

    PubMed 11711693
  • Heit JA. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Clin Chest Med. 2003 Mar;24(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/s0272-5231(02)00077-1.

    PubMed 12685052
  • Heit JA, Phelps MA, Ward SA, Slusser JP, Petterson TM, De Andrade M. Familial segregation of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2004 May;2(5):731-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7933.2004.00660.x.

    PubMed 15099278
  • Heit JA. Venous thromboembolism: disease burden, outcomes and risk factors. J Thromb Haemost. 2005 Aug;3(8):1611-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01415.x.

    PubMed 16102026
  • Heit JA, Petterson TM, Owen WG, Burke JP, DE Andrade M, Melton LJ 3rd. Thrombomodulin gene polymorphisms or haplotypes as potential risk factors for venous thromboembolism: a population-based case-control study. J Thromb Haemost. 2005 Apr;3(4):710-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01187.x.

    PubMed 15842356
  • Heit JA, Lahr BD, Petterson TM, Bailey KR, Ashrani AA, Melton LJ 3rd. Heparin and warfarin anticoagulation intensity as predictors of recurrence after deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism: a population-based cohort study. Blood. 2011 Nov 3;118(18):4992-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-05-357343. Epub 2011 Sep 2.

    PubMed 21890644

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Thromboembolism, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Dec 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean time interval between commencing unfractionated heparin therapy and achieving a therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) (time frame: Day 1 in hospital). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00011180, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Dec 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in