CancerPhase 3NCT00008359
Caspofungin Acetate Compared With Amphotericin B Liposomal in Treating Patients With Persistent Fever and Neutropenia Following Cancer Treatment
A Phase 3 study testing caspofungin acetate and liposomal amphotericin B in people with Cancer, run by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Caspofungin acetate or amphotericin B liposomal may be effective in preventing or controlling fever and neutropenia caused by chemotherapy, bone marrow transplantation, or peripheral stem cell transplantation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer
- What is being tested?
- caspofungin acetate and liposomal amphotericin B
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2000to Mar 2003
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Leukemia, lymphoma, or other cancer that has been previously treated with chemotherapy or bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
- Absolute neutrophil count less than 500/mm^3 for past 96 hours and not expected to recover in next 48 hours
- Received at least 96 hours of parenteral systemic antibacterial therapy
- Fever greater than 38.0 degrees Celsius
- Adequately managed bacterial infection allowed if all of the following are true:
- Negative blood cultures
- Received at least 5 days of antibiotics to which any bacterial isolates are sensitive
- Surgical drainage of any abscess fluid or surgical debridement of infected tissues
- Removal of infected catheters
- No invasive fungal infection
- Not previously enrolled on this study
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
- 16 and over
Performance status:
- Karnofsky 30-100%
Life expectancy:
- At least 5 days
Hematopoietic:
- Platelet count at least 5,000/mm^3
- INR no greater than 1.6 (no greater than 4.0 if receiving anticoagulants)
Hepatic:
- Bilirubin no greater than 3 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
- AST or ALT no greater than 5 times ULN
- Alkaline phosphatase no greater than 3 times ULN
- No acute hepatitis or cirrhosis
Renal:
- Not specified
Other:
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective barrier contraception
- No allergy, hypersensitivity, or prior serious reaction to any echinocandin antifungal or amphotericin B formulation
- No other condition or illness that would preclude study participation
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy:
- See Disease Characteristics
Chemotherapy:
- See Disease Characteristics
- No concurrent investigational antineoplastic therapy
Endocrine therapy:
- Not specified
Radiotherapy:
- Not specified
Surgery:
- Not specified
Other:
- At least 10 days since prior parenteral amphotericin B
- At least 14 days since prior investigational antibiotic, antifungal, or immunosuppressive drug
- No concurrent rifampin or cyclosporine
- No other concurrent investigational antibiotic, antifungal, or immunosuppressive drug
- No concurrent alcohol
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10021
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Comparative Study To Evaluate The Safety, Tolerability, And Efficacy Of MK-0991 Versus (Amphotericin B) Liposome For Injection As Empirical Therapy In Patients With Persistent Fever And Neutropenia
RATIONALE: Caspofungin acetate or amphotericin B liposomal may be effective in preventing or controlling fever and neutropenia caused by chemotherapy, bone marrow transplantation, or peripheral stem cell transplantation. It is not yet known whether caspofungin acetate or amphotericin B liposomal is more effective for treating these side effects.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of caspofungin acetate with that of amphotericin B liposomal in treating patients who have persistent fever and neutropenia after receiving anticancer therapy.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the number of successful treatment outcomes among patients treated with caspofungin acetate vs amphotericin B liposomal for persistent fever and neutropenia following cancer therapy, in terms of survival for 7 days after study drug, resolution of fever, treatment of any baseline fungal infection, absence of breakthrough fungal infection during and for 7 days after study drug, and absence of study drug discontinuation due to toxicity or lack of efficacy.
- Compare the incidence of nephrotoxicity in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the incidence of infusion-related adverse events within 1 hour of the infusion in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the incidence of treatment discontinuation due to drug-related adverse events, frequency of drug-related events, number of breakthrough fungal infections, and number of successfully treated baseline fungal infections in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare incidence of required dose increase due to inadequate clinical response in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the time to resolution of fever in patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to high-risk (prior allogeneic bone marrow transplantation or prior chemotherapy for relapse of acute leukemia) vs low-risk and prior prophylactic antifungal therapy during chemotherapy (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive caspofungin acetate IV over 1 hour followed by placebo IV over 2 hours.
- Arm II: Patients receive placebo IV over 1 hour followed by amphotericin B liposomal IV over 2 hours.
Treatment repeats daily for up to 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients are followed at 7 and 14 days after study drug discontinuation.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 1060 patients (530 per arm) will be accrued for this study.
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Being tested
- caspofungin acetate, liposomal amphotericin B
- Keywords
- stage I adult Hodgkin lymphoma, stage II adult Hodgkin lymphoma, stage III adult Hodgkin lymphoma, stage IV adult Hodgkin lymphoma, stage IV breast cancer, stage IIIA breast cancer, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, stage IIIB breast cancer, recurrent adult Hodgkin lymphoma, stage I cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, stage II cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, stage III cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, stage IV cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, recurrent cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, isolated plasmacytoma of bone, extramedullary plasmacytoma, refractory multiple myeloma, stage II ovarian epithelial cancer, stage III ovarian epithelial cancer, stage IV ovarian epithelial cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Hodgkin Disease, Breast Neoplasms, Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance, Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous, Multiple Myeloma, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Neuroblastoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
caspofungin acetateDrug
liposomal amphotericin BDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Sep 2003 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2000
- Primary completionMar 2003
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- Double blind
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Investigators
- Kent Sepkowitz, MD, Study chair, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00008359
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 00-085
- Other IDs
- MSKCC-00085, MERCK-026-01, NCI-G00-1898
- Status last verified
- Jan 2013
- First submitted
- 6 Jan 2001
- Last updated
- 18 Jan 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Walsh TJ, Teppler H, Donowitz GR, Maertens JA, Baden LR, Dmoszynska A, Cornely OA, Bourque MR, Lupinacci RJ, Sable CA, dePauw BE. Caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 30;351(14):1391-402. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040446.
PubMed 15459300
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jan 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Comparative Study To Evaluate The Safety, Tolerability, And Efficacy Of MK-0991 Versus (Amphotericin B) Liposome For Injection As Empirical Therapy In Patients With Persistent Fever And Neutropenia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00008359
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 00-085
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Keywords
- stage I adult Hodgkin lymphoma, stage II adult Hodgkin lymphoma, stage III adult Hodgkin lymphoma, stage IV adult Hodgkin lymphoma, stage IV breast cancer, stage IIIA breast cancer, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, stage IIIB breast cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Aug 2000
- Primary completion
- Mar 2003 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Sep 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Caspofungin acetate or amphotericin B liposomal may be effective in preventing or controlling fever and neutropenia caused by chemotherapy, bone marrow transplantation, or peripheral stem cell transplantation. It is not yet known whether caspofungin acetate or amphotericin B liposomal is more effective for treating these side effects.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of caspofungin acetate with that of amphotericin B liposomal in treating patients who have persistent fever and neutropenia after receiving anticancer therapy.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the number of successful treatment outcomes among patients treated with caspofungin acetate vs amphotericin B liposomal for persistent fever and neutropenia following cancer therapy, in terms of survival for 7 days after study drug, resolution of fever, treatment of any baseline fungal infection, absence of breakthrough fungal infection during and for 7 days after study drug, and absence of study drug discontinuation due to toxicity or lack of efficacy.
- Compare the incidence of nephrotoxicity in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the incidence of infusion-related adverse events within 1 hour of the infusion in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the incidence of treatment discontinuation due to drug-related adverse events, frequency of drug-related events, number of breakthrough fungal infections, and number of successfully treated baseline fungal infections in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare incidence of required dose increase due to inadequate clinical response in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the time to resolution of fever in patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to high-risk (prior allogeneic bone marrow transplantation or prior chemotherapy for relapse of acute leukemia) vs low-risk and prior prophylactic antifungal therapy during chemotherapy (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive caspofungin acetate IV over 1 hour followed by placebo IV over 2 hours.
- Arm II: Patients receive placebo IV over 1 hour followed by amphotericin B liposomal IV over 2 hours.
Treatment repeats daily for up to 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients are followed at 7 and 14 days after study drug discontinuation.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 1060 patients (530 per arm) will be accrued for this study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- Double blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| caspofungin acetate | Drug | – |
| liposomal amphotericin B | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jan 2013.
- Results publication: PubMed 15459300Walsh TJ, Teppler H, Donowitz GR, Maertens JA, Baden LR, Dmoszynska A, Cornely OA, Bourque MR, Lupinacci RJ, Sable CA, dePauw BE. Caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 30;351(14):1391-402. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040446.
Related trials for Cancer
Recruiting
MRD-Guided Postoperative Surveillance and Adaptive Treatment for Resectable Lung Cancer
Lung Neoplasms, Neoadjuvant Therapy
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Tamoxifen Citrate or Z-Endoxifen Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic, Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
Recurrent Breast Carcinoma, Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v7
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Phase II Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of SXRN Injection in Patients With Cancer Cachexia
Cachexia-Anorexia Syndrome, Cachexia; Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Adebrelimab ±Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Unresectable Locally Advanced ESCC
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Immunotherapy
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) in Children With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kent Sepkowitz, MD study chair
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing caspofungin acetate and liposomal amphotericin B in people with Cancer, run by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jan 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00008359, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jan 2013.