Heart FailurePhase 3NCT00007683
Warfarin and Antiplatelet Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure
A Phase 3 study testing Warfarin titrated to an INR of 2.5-3.0, Aspirin and Clopidogrel 75 in people with Heart Failure, run by US Department of Veterans Affairs at 134 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
Whether patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) should be anticoagulated is one of the oldest unresolved questions in cardiovascular therapeutics. Some authorities do not recommend anticoagulation for CHF patients in sinus rhythm, others recommend anticoagulation in patients with primary cardiomyopathy, and still… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure
- What is being tested?
- Warfarin titrated to an INR of 2.5-3.0, Aspirin and Clopidogrel 75
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,587 participants
- Where
- 134 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Oct 1998to Dec 2004
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with NYHA class II, III, or IV and left ventricular ejection fractions less than or equal to 35%, on an ACE inhibitor (unless not tolerated) and on a diuretic.
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
134 sites in 3 countries.
134 sites in 3 countries
United States79 sites
VA Stratton Medical Center, Albany
Albany, New York, 12208
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48113
Florida Cardiovascular Research
Atlantis, Florida, 33462
VA Medical Center, Augusta
Augusta, Georgia, 30904
VA Medical Center, Bay Pines
Bay Pines, Florida, 33708
Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford
Bedford, Massachusetts, 01730
VA Gulf Coast Veterans Health Care System, Biloxi
Biloxi, Mississippi, 39531
VA Medical Center, Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
VA Boston Healthcare System, Brockton Campus
Brockton, Massachusetts, 02301
VA Western New York Healthcare System at Buffalo
Buffalo, New York, 14215
Univ of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7075
Jesse Brown VAMC (WestSide Division)
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
VA Medical Center, Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45220
VA Medical Center, Cleveland
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Chalmers P. Wylie VAOPC
Columbus, Ohio, 43203-1278
VA Medical Center, Dayton
Dayton, Ohio, 45428
Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver
Denver, Colorado, 80220
Cardiology Associates of Derby, P.C.
Derby, Connecticut, 06418
John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center
Downey, California, 90242
VA Medical Center, Durham
Durham, North Carolina, 27705
VA Medical Center, Fargo
Fargo, North Dakota, 58102
New York Hospital Medical Center Of Queens
Flushing, New York, 11355
VA Black Hills Health Care System, Fort Meade
Fort Meade, South Dakota, 57741
VA Central California Health Care System, Fresno
Fresno, California, 93703
North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System
Gainesville, Florida, 32608
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas, 77555-0553
St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center
Hartford, Connecticut, 06120
Margaret Pardee Memorial Hospital
Hendersonville, North Carolina, 28739
Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital
Hines, Illinois, 60141-5000
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (152)
Houston, Texas, 77030
VA Medical Center, Huntington
Huntington, West Virginia, 25704
River Cities Cardiology
Jeffersonville, Indiana, 47130
VA Medical Center, Kansas City MO
Kansas City, Missouri, 64128
Watson Clinic LLP
Lakeland, Florida, 33805
Lincoln Division VA Nebraska Western IA HCS
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68510
VA Medical Center, Loma Linda
Loma Linda, California, 92357
Wlliam S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705
North Shore University Hospital
Manhasset, New York, 11030
VA Medical Center, Martinsburg
Martinsburg, West Virginia, 25041
VA Medical Center, Memphis
Memphis, Tennessee, 38104
Brevard Cardiology
Merritt Island, Florida, 32952
VA Medical Center, Miami
Miami, Florida, 33125
VA Medical Center, Minneapolis
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55417
VA Medical Center, Muskogee
Muskogee, Oklahoma, 74401
VA Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212-2637
New York Harbor HCS
New York, New York, 10010
Central Arkansas VHS Eugene J. Towbin Healthcare Ctr, Little Rock
No. Little Rock, Arkansas, 72114-1706
VA Medical Center, Northport
Northport, New York, 11768
VA Medical Center, Oklahoma City
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Palo Alto, California, 94304-1290
Cardiology Consultants - Pensacola
Pensacola, Florida, 32501
Heart Care Midwest
Peoria, Illinois, 61603
VA Medical Center, Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Carl T. Hayden VA Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85012
VA Pittsburgh Health Care System
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15240
VA Medical Center, Portland
Portland, Oregon, 97201
VA Medical Center, Providence
Providence, Rhode Island, 02908
VA Sierra Nevada Health Care System
Reno, Nevada, 89502
Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center
Richmond, Virginia, 23249
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84148
VA South Texas Health Care System, San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
VA Medical Center, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94121
VA Greater Los Angeles HCS, Sepulveda
Sepulveda, California, 91343
Overton Brooks VA Medical Center, Shreveport
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71101
DUCCS Research of South Boston
South Boston, Virginia, 24592
Bay State Medical Center
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01104
VA Medical Center, St Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63106
VA Medical Center, Syracuse
Syracuse, New York, 13210
University Cardiology Consultants
Tamarac, Florida, 33321
James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa
Tampa, Florida, 33612
William Beaumont Hospital
Trey, Michigan, 48095
Southern Arizona VA Health Care System, Tucson
Tucson, Arizona, 85723
Cardiovascular Consultants, Walnut Creek
Walnut Creek, California, 94598
VA Medical Center, DC
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20422
VA Connecticut Health Care System (West Haven)
West Haven, Connecticut, 06516
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West LA
West Los Angeles, California, 90073
Canada28 sites
Ajax and Pickering General Hospital
Ajax, Ontario, L1S 7K8
Bramptom, Research Associates
Brampton, Ontario, L6V 1B4
Cardiology Consultants
Calgary, Alberta, T2E 7C5
Alder Medical Centre
Campbell River, British Columbia, V9W 6X8
University of Alberta Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7
Grey Nuns Com. Hospital and Health Centre
Edmonton, Alberta, T6L 5X8
Neureka Research Inc. Willett Green Millr Cntr
Greater Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 6B4
Queen Elizabeth II HSC
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3A7
Hamilton Health Sciences Corp. - General Div
Hamilton, Ontario, L8L 2X2
St. Joseph's Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, L8P 3B6
London HSC - University Campus
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5
Invascor Clinical Research Inc.
Longeuil, Quebec, J4N 1E1
Credit Valley Hospital Research Associates
Mississauga, Ontario, L5M 2N1
Cardiology Clinic - Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4
Niagara Falls Medical Center
Niagara Falls, Ontario, L2E 7H1
North Shore Cardiology Laboratory
North Vancouver, British Columbia, V7L 2P7
Ottawa Heart Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4W7
Regina General Hospital
Regina, Saskatchewan, S4P 0W5
Etobicoke General Hospital
Rexdale, Ontario, M9V 4B8
St. Paul's Hospital
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7K 0Z9
Royal University Hospital
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8
Cardiology Research Associates
Scarborough Village, Ontario, M1S 4V5
Surrey Memorial Hospital - Cardiology
Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 1Z2
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8
Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8
Hotel-Dieu D'Artabaska
Victoriaville, Quebec, G6P 6N2
St. Boniface General Hospital
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2H 2A6
Health Sciences Centre - Cardiology Research
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1R9
United Kingdom27 sites
Barnsley District General
Barnsley, South Yorkshire, S75 2EP
Royal Victoria Hospital
Belfast, Antrim, BT12 6BA
Blackpool Victoria Hospital
Blackpool, Lancashire, FY3 8NR
Bridlington and District Hospital
Bridlington, Bridlington, YO16 4QP
Cardiology Research Unit Sussex House
Brighton, Sussex, BN2 1ES
Castle Hill Hospital
Cottingham, Hull, HU16 5JG
Derbyshire Royal Infirmary
Derby, Derby, DE1 2QY
Derriford Hospital
Devon, Devon, PL6 8DH
Glasgow Western Infirmary
Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ
Princess of Wales Hospital (Grimsby)
Grimsby, South Humberside, DN33 2BA
Northwick Park Hospital and Institue for Medical R
Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ
King Geroge Hospital
Ilford, Essex, IG3 8YB
St. James' University Hospital
Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS9 7TF
St. Thomas' Hospital
London, London, SE1 7EH
Luton and Dunstable Hospital
Luton, Beds, LU4 0DZ
South Cleveland Hospital
Middlesbrough, Cleveland, TS4 3BW
Royal Alexandra Hospital
Paisley, Renfrewshire, PA2 9PN
Newham General Hospital
Plaistow, London, E13 8SL
Pontefract General Infirmary
Pontefract, West Yorshire, WF8 1PL
Scunthorpe General Hospital
Scunthorpe, North Lincolnshire, DN15 7BH
Selly Oak Hospital
Selly Oak, Birmingham, B29 6JD
Northern General Hospital
Sheffield, Yorkshire, S5 7AU
Stepping Hills Hospital
Stockport, Cheshire, SK2 7JE
Torbay District General
Torbay, Devon, TQ2 7AA
Pinderfields General Hospital
Wakefield, United Kingdom, WF1 4DG
Wythenshawe Hospital
Wythenshawe, Manchester, M23 9LT
York District Hospital
York, North Yorkshire, YO3 7HE
About this study
Official title: CSP #442 - Warfarin and Antiplatelet Therapy Study in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure (WATCH)
Whether patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) should be anticoagulated is one of the oldest unresolved questions in cardiovascular therapeutics. Some authorities do not recommend anticoagulation for CHF patients in sinus rhythm, others recommend anticoagulation in patients with primary cardiomyopathy, and still others consider it more appropriate in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). This absence of consensus reflects the lack of evidence in this area and different outlooks on the objectives of such therapy (e.g., prevention of arterial emboli or reduction in vascular events).
Read the detailed description
Primary Hypothesis: The hypothesis to be tested is whether aspirin, warfarin, and clopidogrel are equally effective in the treatment of patients with symptomatic CHF and reduced ejection fraction.
Secondary Hypothesis: If one therapy proves to be superior with regard to outcomes, what is the cost of this benefit? Can subsets of patients be identified who benefit more from a specific approach to antithrombotic therapy?
Intervention: The three treatment regimens are:
- Open-label Warfarin titrated to an INR of 2.5-3.0;
- Double blind aspirin 162 mg once daily;
- Double blind clopidogrel 75 mg once daily.
Primary Outcomes: Any death (all causes), non-fatal stroke, non-fatal MI.
Study Abstract: Whether patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) should be anticoagulated is one of the oldest unresolved questions in cardiovascular therapeutics. Some authorities do not recommend anticoagulation for CHF patients in sinus rhythm, others recommend anticoagulation in patients with primary cardiomyopathy, and still others consider it more appropriate in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). This absence of consensus reflects the lack of evidence in this area and different outlooks on the objectives of such therapy (e.g., prevention of arterial emboli or reduction in vascular events).
The original target sample size was 4,500 over a 3 year enrollment period with a 2 year follow-up. This sample size yielded 90% power to detect a relative difference of 20% between treatment groups. The sample size was later amended to 1,500 over a 30 month enrollment period with a 12 month follow-up. The reduced sample size yielded 85% to detect a between treatment difference of 30%. This change became effective in March 2002.
This clinical trial enrolled 1,587 patients in 142 medical centers; VA and non-VA centers in the U.S., and medical centers in the United Kingdom and Canada. Patients were randomly and equally allocated to the 3 treatments: warfarin (administered open-label), aspirin and clopidogrel (the latter two administered double-blind). The study was conducted over a 3.5 year period, with a 2.5 year enrollment phase.
Patients with NYHA class II, III, or IV and left ventricular ejection fractions less than or equal to 35% on an ACE inhibitor (unless not tolerated) and a diuretic were entered. The primary end point is the composite of death from any cause, non-fatal MI, and non-fatal stroke. All-cause mortality is the secondary end point.
The WATCH design paper has been published in the Journal of Cardiac Failure. Preliminary results were presented at the meeting of the American College of Cardiology in New Orleans on March 9, 2004. There were no significant differences between the treatment groups for the primary endpoints. The paper with final results is being prepared.
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Being tested
- Warfarin titrated to an INR of 2.5-3.0, Aspirin, Clopidogrel 75
- Keywords
- aspirin, clopidogrel, embolic events, Left ventricular ejection fraction less than or eq, NYHA Class II, III or IV CHF, symptomatic CHF, warfarin
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Warfarin titrated to an INR of 2.5-3.0Drug
anticoagulation (administered without blinding) titrated to a target INR of 2.5 to 3.0, monitored by measurements at 6 week intervals after initial titration and stabilization.
AspirinDrug
an antiplatelet agent whose mechanism is inhibition of thromboxane, a platelet activator) administered in a double blind manner.
Clopidogrel 75Drug
(an antiplatelet agent whose mechanism is ADP inhibition) administered in a double blind manner)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Warfarin Titrated to an INR of 2.5-3.0 Receives: Drug: Warfarin titrated to an INR of 2.5-3.0 |
| 2 | Active comparator | Aspirin 182 mg Receives: Drug: Aspirin |
| 3 | Active comparator | Clopidogrel 75 mg Receives: Drug: Clopidogrel 75 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
acomposite of mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction and nonfatal stroke
The primary safety end point was major bleeding episodes, defined as bleeding episodes leading to death or disability (including loss of neurological or special senses function), requiring surgical intervention, or associated with an acute decline of hemoglobin 2gm/dl or transfusion of >1 U packed red cells or whole blood.
Measured: 30 months intake; 12-42 months follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jan 2001 (estimated)
- Study startOct 1998
- Primary completionJul 2003
- Study completionDec 2004
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,587 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- US Department of Veterans Affairs
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Collaborators
- Sanofi-Synthelabo, Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Investigators
- Barry M. Massie, MD, Study chair, VA Medical Center, San Francisco
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00007683
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 442
- Status last verified
- Jun 2011
- First submitted
- 29 Dec 2000
- Last updated
- 16 Jun 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Massie BM, Krol WF, Ammon SE, Armstrong PW, Cleland JG, Collins JF, Ezekowitz M, Jafri SM, O'Connor CM, Packer M, Schulman KA, Teo K, Warren S. The Warfarin and Antiplatelet Therapy in Heart Failure trial (WATCH): rationale, design, and baseline patient characteristics. J Card Fail. 2004 Apr;10(2):101-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2004.02.006.
PubMed 15101020Massie BM, Collins JF, Ammon SE, Armstrong PW, Cleland JG, Ezekowitz M, Jafri SM, Krol WF, O'Connor CM, Schulman KA, Teo K, Warren SR; WATCH Trial Investigators. Randomized trial of warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel in patients with chronic heart failure: the Warfarin and Antiplatelet Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure (WATCH) trial. Circulation. 2009 Mar 31;119(12):1616-24. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.801753. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
PubMed 19289640Patterson ME, Grant WC, Glickman SW, Massie BM, Ammon SE, Armstrong PW, Cleland JG, Collins JF, Teo KK, Schulman KA, Reed SD. Resource use and costs of treatment with anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents: results of the WATCH trial economic evaluation. J Card Fail. 2009 Dec;15(10):819-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2009.07.004. Epub 2009 Aug 21.
PubMed 19944357
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jun 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- CSP #442 - Warfarin and Antiplatelet Therapy Study in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure (WATCH)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00007683
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 442
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Keywords
- aspirin, clopidogrel, embolic events, Left ventricular ejection fraction less than or eq, NYHA Class II, III or IV CHF, symptomatic CHF, warfarin
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,587 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- US Department of Veterans AffairsUS federal agency
- Collaborators
- Sanofi-Synthelabo, Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Study start
- Oct 1998
- Primary completion
- Jul 2003 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2004 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jan 2001 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Whether patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) should be anticoagulated is one of the oldest unresolved questions in cardiovascular therapeutics. Some authorities do not recommend anticoagulation for CHF patients in sinus rhythm, others recommend anticoagulation in patients with primary cardiomyopathy, and still others consider it more appropriate in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). This absence of consensus reflects the lack of evidence in this area and different outlooks on the objectives of such therapy (e.g., prevention of arterial emboli or reduction in vascular events).
Detailed description
Primary Hypothesis: The hypothesis to be tested is whether aspirin, warfarin, and clopidogrel are equally effective in the treatment of patients with symptomatic CHF and reduced ejection fraction.
Secondary Hypothesis: If one therapy proves to be superior with regard to outcomes, what is the cost of this benefit? Can subsets of patients be identified who benefit more from a specific approach to antithrombotic therapy?
Intervention: The three treatment regimens are:
- Open-label Warfarin titrated to an INR of 2.5-3.0;
- Double blind aspirin 162 mg once daily;
- Double blind clopidogrel 75 mg once daily.
Primary Outcomes: Any death (all causes), non-fatal stroke, non-fatal MI.
Study Abstract: Whether patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) should be anticoagulated is one of the oldest unresolved questions in cardiovascular therapeutics. Some authorities do not recommend anticoagulation for CHF patients in sinus rhythm, others recommend anticoagulation in patients with primary cardiomyopathy, and still others consider it more appropriate in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). This absence of consensus reflects the lack of evidence in this area and different outlooks on the objectives of such therapy (e.g., prevention of arterial emboli or reduction in vascular events).
The original target sample size was 4,500 over a 3 year enrollment period with a 2 year follow-up. This sample size yielded 90% power to detect a relative difference of 20% between treatment groups. The sample size was later amended to 1,500 over a 30 month enrollment period with a 12 month follow-up. The reduced sample size yielded 85% to detect a between treatment difference of 30%. This change became effective in March 2002.
This clinical trial enrolled 1,587 patients in 142 medical centers; VA and non-VA centers in the U.S., and medical centers in the United Kingdom and Canada. Patients were randomly and equally allocated to the 3 treatments: warfarin (administered open-label), aspirin and clopidogrel (the latter two administered double-blind). The study was conducted over a 3.5 year period, with a 2.5 year enrollment phase.
Patients with NYHA class II, III, or IV and left ventricular ejection fractions less than or equal to 35% on an ACE inhibitor (unless not tolerated) and a diuretic were entered. The primary end point is the composite of death from any cause, non-fatal MI, and non-fatal stroke. All-cause mortality is the secondary end point.
The WATCH design paper has been published in the Journal of Cardiac Failure. Preliminary results were presented at the meeting of the American College of Cardiology in New Orleans on March 9, 2004. There were no significant differences between the treatment groups for the primary endpoints. The paper with final results is being prepared.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Drug: Warfarin titrated to an INR of 2.5-3.0Warfarin Titrated to an INR of 2.5-3.0 |
| 2 | Active comparator | Drug: AspirinAspirin 182 mg |
| 3 | Active comparator | Drug: Clopidogrel 75Clopidogrel 75 mg |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with NYHA class II, III, or IV and left ventricular ejection fractions less than or equal to 35%, on an ACE inhibitor (unless not tolerated) and on a diuretic.
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Warfarin titrated to an INR of 2.5-3.0anticoagulation (administered without blinding) titrated to a target INR of 2.5 to 3.0, monitored by measurements at 6 week intervals after initial titration and stabilization. | Drug | 1 |
| Aspirinan antiplatelet agent whose mechanism is inhibition of thromboxane, a platelet activator) administered in a double blind manner. | Drug | 2 |
| Clopidogrel 75(an antiplatelet agent whose mechanism is ADP inhibition) administered in a double blind manner) | Drug | 3 |
Primary outcome
acomposite of mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction and nonfatal stroke
Time frame: 30 months intake; 12-42 months follow-up
The primary safety end point was major bleeding episodes, defined as bleeding episodes leading to death or disability (including loss of neurological or special senses function), requiring surgical intervention, or associated with an acute decline of hemoglobin 2gm/dl or transfusion of >1 U packed red cells or whole blood.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jun 2011.
- Background: PubMed 15101020Massie BM, Krol WF, Ammon SE, Armstrong PW, Cleland JG, Collins JF, Ezekowitz M, Jafri SM, O'Connor CM, Packer M, Schulman KA, Teo K, Warren S. The Warfarin and Antiplatelet Therapy in Heart Failure trial (WATCH): rationale, design, and baseline patient characteristics. J Card Fail. 2004 Apr;10(2):101-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2004.02.006.
- Results publication: PubMed 19289640Massie BM, Collins JF, Ammon SE, Armstrong PW, Cleland JG, Ezekowitz M, Jafri SM, Krol WF, O'Connor CM, Schulman KA, Teo K, Warren SR; WATCH Trial Investigators. Randomized trial of warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel in patients with chronic heart failure: the Warfarin and Antiplatelet Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure (WATCH) trial. Circulation. 2009 Mar 31;119(12):1616-24. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.801753. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 19944357Patterson ME, Grant WC, Glickman SW, Massie BM, Ammon SE, Armstrong PW, Cleland JG, Collins JF, Teo KK, Schulman KA, Reed SD. Resource use and costs of treatment with anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents: results of the WATCH trial economic evaluation. J Card Fail. 2009 Dec;15(10):819-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2009.07.004. Epub 2009 Aug 21.
Related trials for Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Bimagrumab in Participants With HFpEF
Heart Failure, Diastolic, Diastolic Heart Failure
Recruiting
Evaluation of a French Hospital Discharge Therapeutic Education Program by Nurses for Heart Failure Patient (EduSor)
Heart Failure
Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Not yet recruiting
RELIEVE-HFrEF TRIAL: REducing Lung congestIon Symptoms Using the v-wavE Shunt in adVancEd Heart Failure With Reduced EF
Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure Chronic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Barry M. Massie, MD study chair
VA Medical Center, San Francisco
134 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Warfarin titrated to an INR of 2.5-3.0, Aspirin and Clopidogrel 75 in people with Heart Failure, run by US Department of Veterans Affairs at 134 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jun 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 134 sites in United States, Canada, United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
acomposite of mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction and nonfatal stroke (time frame: 30 months intake; 12-42 months follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00007683, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jun 2011.