AzTrials
AzTrials

Blood DiseaseNCT00006312

Hemochromatosis--Genetic Prevalence and Penetrance

An observational study of Blood Disease and Hemochromatosis, run by University of Rochester.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To examine the cost effectiveness of hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) screening in primary care. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 100 years, men only
Conditions the study is for
Blood Disease, Hemochromatosis
How many people
Not given
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jul 1999to May 2003
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 100 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

No eligibility criteria

About this study

To examine the cost effectiveness of hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) screening in primary care.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is the most common inherited disorder among Caucasians with an estimated frequency as high as 8 per 1000. Affected individuals absorb excessive amounts of dietary iron and develop progressive accumulation of tissue iron stores with consequent organ dysfunction including hepatic cirrhosis, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, arthropathy and impotence. Early diagnosis and institution of phlebotomy treatments will prevent disease manifestations and normalize life expectancy. In 1996, HFE, the gene for HHC was mapped on the short arm of chromosome 6 (6p21.3). HH is therefore a natural target for the development of a routine screening strategy.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

The investigators have demonstrated the favorable cost-effectiveness ratio of adopting a screening strategy for HH and have screened 16,031 primary care patients using serum transferrin saturation (TS) levels to confirm the prevalence of undiagnosed HH in this setting and to demonstrate the feasibility of screening. The recent description of HFE gene mutations in individuals with HH has made genetic testing for HH possible and may increase the attractiveness of general screening. However, several important questions about genetic prevalence and penetrance remain to be addressed before such a recommendation can be made. The large screened sample provides a unique opportunity to address several of these important issues. First, they will obtain population-based estimates of the prevalence of HFE gene mutations. Second, they will determine the sensitivity of serum TS testing for detecting these mutations. Third, the comparison of genotype and phenotype will allow them to draw useful inferences about disease penetrance. The results will enable them to propose an optimal screening strategy for HH and to determine the place of genetic testing in the diagnostic algorithm. This strategy may vary depending on age, sex and race. The answers to these questions will enable them to determine with greater confidence the relative effectiveness of a screening strategy for HH and will clarify for primary care practitioners which of their patients should be screened for this disorder. These questions have recently been identified as a priority by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Medical subject headings
Hematologic Diseases, Hemochromatosis

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Sep 2000 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 1999
  3. Study completionMay 2003

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00006312
Sponsor's protocol ID
920
Other IDs
R01HL061428
Status last verified
Jan 2016
First submitted
28 Sep 2000
Last updated
15 Jan 2016
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Sham RL, Raubertas RF, Braggins C, Cappuccio J, Gallagher M, Phatak PD. Asymptomatic hemochromatosis subjects: genotypic and phenotypic profiles. Blood. 2000 Dec 1;96(12):3707-11.

    PubMed 11090050
  • Phatak PD, Ryan DH, Cappuccio J, Oakes D, Braggins C, Provenzano K, Eberly S, Sham RL. Prevalence and penetrance of HFE mutations in 4865 unselected primary care patients. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2002 Jul-Aug;29(1):41-7. doi: 10.1006/bcmd.2002.0536.

    PubMed 12482402

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Blood Disease and Hemochromatosis, run by University of Rochester.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jan 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00006312, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jan 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in