LeukemiaPhase 3NCT00006045
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in Treating Patients With Refractory or Relapsed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
A Phase 3 study testing lintuzumab, cytarabine and etoposide in people with Leukemia, run by Facet Biotech at 59 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Monoclonal antibodies can locate tumor cells and either kill them or deliver tumor-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- lintuzumab, cytarabine and etoposide
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- 59 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 2000to not given
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically proven acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) that may have been primary AML, secondary AML, or preceded by hematologic disorder All FAB subtypes except M3 Must meet one of the following three criteria: First relapse within 1 year after documentation of a previous complete remission (CR) achieved by chemotherapy Refractory to prior chemotherapy comprised of a minimum of 1 induction course, including cytarabine at a minimum of 500 mg/m2 (e.g., 100 mg/m2/day for 5 days) plus an anthracycline No high dose cytarabine (no cumulative dose greater than 3 g/m2) First relapse from a previous CR with subsequent autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT), only if all of the following criteria are met: First BMT At least 100 days but less than 1 year posttransplantation At least 25% cellularity of the bone marrow Previous BMT included full hematopoietic recovery, defined by all of the following: Hemoglobin at least 10 g/dL (without transfusion) Platelet count at least 100,000/mm3 (without transfusion) Absolute neutrophil count at least 1,500/mm3 No transplantation candidates Bone marrow blasts (leukemic cells) greater than 10% No chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast crisis No active CNS leukemia
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 18 and over Performance status: Karnofsky 50-100% Life expectancy: Not specified Hematopoietic: See Disease Characteristics Hepatic: Bilirubin less than 2.0 mg/dL (unless related to Gilbert's disease or due to leukemic infiltration) SGOT or SGPT no greater than 4 times upper limit of normal (unless related to AML) Renal: Creatinine less than 2.0 mg/dL (unless related to AML) Cardiovascular: Left ventricular function normal No unstable cardiac arrhythmias, unstable angina pectoris, or myocardial infarction within the past 6 months No New York Heart Association class III or IV heart disease No electrocardiogram evidence of active ischemia Other: Not pregnant or nursing Negative pregnancy test Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for 1 month after study HIV negative No other active malignancy requiring therapy No active serious infection that is uncontrolled by antimicrobial therapy Medically stable No significant organ dysfunction
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: See Disease Characteristics At least 30 days since prior experimental biologic therapy (e.g., interleukin-2) No concurrent biologic therapy, including bone marrow transplantation Chemotherapy: See Disease Characteristics For first relapse AML with recent or prior chemotherapy: Prior hydroxyurea given as a short course (up to 48 hours) allowed, if needed, to reduce the peripheral leukocyte count Hydroxyurea must be discontinued prior to study For refractory AML with recent or prior chemotherapy: Greater than 2 weeks since prior chemotherapy except hydroxyurea given as above No other concurrent chemotherapy Endocrine therapy: Not specified Radiotherapy: No concurrent radiotherapy Surgery: Not specified Other: No other concurrent experimental therapy Concurrent therapy for other preexisting diseases allowed
Trial locations and contacts
59 sites in 7 countries.
59 sites in 7 countries
United States40 sites
Akron General Medical Center
Akron, Ohio, 44302
Emory Clinic
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Johns Hopkins Oncology Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231
New England Medical Center Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263-0001
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7295
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Ireland Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5065
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
West Michigan Cancer Center
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007
Nevada Cancer Center
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033-0800
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1781
Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope
Los Angeles, California, 91010
North Shore University Hospital
Manhasset, New York, 11030
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
West Clinic, P.C.
Memphis, Tennessee, 38117
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-2516
Cancer Institute of New Jersey
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10021
New York Presbyterian Hospital - Cornell Campus
New York, New York, 10021
St. Joseph Hospital - Orange
Orange, California, 92613-5600
University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Sutter Cancer Center
Sacramento, California, 95816
University of California Davis Cancer Center
Sacramento, California, 95817
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center
San Diego, California, 92121
Louisiana State University School of Medicine
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71130-3932
Washington University Barnard Cancer Center
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Albert Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center
The Bronx, New York, 10461
North Mississippi Hematology and Oncology Associates, Ltd.
Tupelo, Mississippi, 38801
New York Medical College
Valhalla, New York, 10595
Washington Cancer Institute
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
Germany5 sites
Universitaetsklinikum Benjamin Franklin
Berlin, D-12200
Klinikum der J.W. Goethe Universitaet
Frankfurt, D-60590
Klinikum Rechts Der Isar/Technische Universitaet Muenchen
Munich, D-81675
Westfaelische Wilhelms-Universitaet
Münster, DOH-4-8149
University of Rostock
Rostock, 18057
Canada4 sites
Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
Health Sciences Centre
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1R9
United Kingdom4 sites
Addenbrooke's NHS Trust
Cambridge, England, CB2 2QQ
Royal Free Hospital
Hampstead, London, England, NW3 2QG
Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust
Leeds, England, LS1 3EX
Christie Hospital N.H.S. Trust
Manchester, England, M20 4BX
Belgium3 sites
Algemeen Ziekenhuis Middelheim
Antwerp, 2020
Institut Jules Bordet
Brussels, 1000
U.Z. Gasthuisberg
Leuven, B-3000
France2 sites
Centre Hospitalier Regional et Universitaire d'Angers
Angers, 49033
CHRU de Nancy - Hopitaux de Brabois
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
About this study
Official title: Phase III, Randomized, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of HuM195 (Recombinant Humanized Anti-CD33 Monoclonal Antibody) in Combination With Standardized Chemotherapy Compared to Standardized Chemotherapy Alone in the Treatment of Patients With Refractory or First-Relapsed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Monoclonal antibodies can locate tumor cells and either kill them or deliver tumor-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. It is not yet known if chemotherapy is more effective with or without monoclonal antibody therapy for acute myelogenous leukemia.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy with or without monoclonal antibody therapy in treating patients who have refractory or relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine (MEC) with or without monoclonal antibody HuG1-M195 in patients with refractory or relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified by age (under 50 vs 50 and over) and duration of previous complete remission (CR) (0-6 vs 7-12 months). All patients receive induction chemotherapy comprised of cytarabine IV over 2 hours, mitoxantrone IV over a maximum of 20 minutes, and etoposide IV over 1-2 hours on days 1-6. On day 5 of induction, patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms: Arm I: Patients receive day 6 of induction chemotherapy. Patients then receive monoclonal antibody HuG1-M195 (MOAB HuM195) IV over 4 hours on days 6-9 or 7-10. Treatment with MOAB HuM195 repeats every 2 weeks for 2 courses (courses 1 and 2) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. During course 1, MOAB HuM195 begins 30 minutes to 24 hours postchemotherapy. Patients who do not achieve CR by day 70 of induction and show evidence of bone marrow progression (regimen failure (RF)) are taken off study. Patients without RF are assigned to one of two consolidation groups based on response: Group A (CR): Patients receive consolidation chemotherapy comprised of mitoxantrone IV over a maximum of 20 minutes on days 1 and 2, and cytarabine IV over 2 hours and etoposide IV over 1-2 hours on days 1-4. Patients with New York Heart Association class II heart disease preconsolidation receive no mitoxantrone during consolidation. Patients receive MOAB HuM195 IV over 4 hours on days 4-7 or 5-8. Treatment with MOAB HuM195 repeats every 2 weeks for 2 additional courses (courses 3 and 4). During course 3, MOAB HuM195 begins 30 minutes to 24 hours postchemotherapy. Group B (partial remission (PR), hematologic improvement (HI), or stable disease (SD)): Patients receive MOAB HuM195 as in group A but no consolidation chemotherapy. Patients without RF after treatment on group A or B receive maintenance MOAB HuM195 IV over 4 hours on days 1-4. Treatment repeats every month for 8 additional courses (courses 5-12). Arm II: Patients receive day 6 of induction chemotherapy. Patients receive no MOAB HuM195 during the entire study. Patients without RF at day 70 of induction are assigned to one of two consolidation groups based on response: Group C (CR): Patients receive consolidation chemotherapy as in group A. Group D (PR, HI, or SD): Patients receive no further treatment. Patients may be eligible to receive MOAB HuM195 on PDL Study 195-302. Patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year, and then every 6 months thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A maximum of 200 patients (100 per arm) will be accrued for this study.
- Conditions
- Leukemia
- Being tested
- lintuzumab, cytarabine, etoposide, mitoxantrone hydrochloride
- Keywords
- recurrent adult acute myeloid leukemia, adult acute erythroid leukemia (M6), adult acute myeloblastic leukemia without maturation (M1), adult acute myeloblastic leukemia with maturation (M2), adult acute myelomonocytic leukemia (M4), adult acute monoblastic leukemia (M5a), adult acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (M7), secondary acute myeloid leukemia, adult acute monocytic leukemia (M5b), adult acute minimally differentiated myeloid leukemia (M0)
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Leukemia, Erythroblastic, Acute, Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Acute, Leukemia, Monocytic, Acute, Leukemia, Megakaryoblastic, Acute
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
lintuzumabBiological
cytarabineDrug
etoposideDrug
mitoxantrone hydrochlorideDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Apr 2004 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2000
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Facet Biotech
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Investigators
- Daniel Levitt, MD, PhD, Study chair, Facet Biotech
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00006045
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000068061
- Other IDs
- PDL-195-301, MSKCC-00029, UCLA-9910050, NCI-G00-1819
- Status last verified
- Feb 2010
- First submitted
- 5 Jul 2000
- Last updated
- 6 Nov 2013
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Nov 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase III, Randomized, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of HuM195 (Recombinant Humanized Anti-CD33 Monoclonal Antibody) in Combination With Standardized Chemotherapy Compared to Standardized Chemotherapy Alone in the Treatment of Patients With Refractory or First-Relapsed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00006045
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000068061
- Conditions
- Leukemia
- Keywords
- recurrent adult acute myeloid leukemia, adult acute erythroid leukemia (M6), adult acute myeloblastic leukemia without maturation (M1), adult acute myeloblastic leukemia with maturation (M2), adult acute myelomonocytic leukemia (M4), adult acute monoblastic leukemia (M5a), adult acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (M7), secondary acute myeloid leukemia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Lead sponsor
- Facet BiotechIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Mar 2000
- First posted
- 13 Apr 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Monoclonal antibodies can locate tumor cells and either kill them or deliver tumor-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. It is not yet known if chemotherapy is more effective with or without monoclonal antibody therapy for acute myelogenous leukemia.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy with or without monoclonal antibody therapy in treating patients who have refractory or relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine (MEC) with or without monoclonal antibody HuG1-M195 in patients with refractory or relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified by age (under 50 vs 50 and over) and duration of previous complete remission (CR) (0-6 vs 7-12 months). All patients receive induction chemotherapy comprised of cytarabine IV over 2 hours, mitoxantrone IV over a maximum of 20 minutes, and etoposide IV over 1-2 hours on days 1-6. On day 5 of induction, patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms: Arm I: Patients receive day 6 of induction chemotherapy. Patients then receive monoclonal antibody HuG1-M195 (MOAB HuM195) IV over 4 hours on days 6-9 or 7-10. Treatment with MOAB HuM195 repeats every 2 weeks for 2 courses (courses 1 and 2) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. During course 1, MOAB HuM195 begins 30 minutes to 24 hours postchemotherapy. Patients who do not achieve CR by day 70 of induction and show evidence of bone marrow progression (regimen failure (RF)) are taken off study. Patients without RF are assigned to one of two consolidation groups based on response: Group A (CR): Patients receive consolidation chemotherapy comprised of mitoxantrone IV over a maximum of 20 minutes on days 1 and 2, and cytarabine IV over 2 hours and etoposide IV over 1-2 hours on days 1-4. Patients with New York Heart Association class II heart disease preconsolidation receive no mitoxantrone during consolidation. Patients receive MOAB HuM195 IV over 4 hours on days 4-7 or 5-8. Treatment with MOAB HuM195 repeats every 2 weeks for 2 additional courses (courses 3 and 4). During course 3, MOAB HuM195 begins 30 minutes to 24 hours postchemotherapy. Group B (partial remission (PR), hematologic improvement (HI), or stable disease (SD)): Patients receive MOAB HuM195 as in group A but no consolidation chemotherapy. Patients without RF after treatment on group A or B receive maintenance MOAB HuM195 IV over 4 hours on days 1-4. Treatment repeats every month for 8 additional courses (courses 5-12). Arm II: Patients receive day 6 of induction chemotherapy. Patients receive no MOAB HuM195 during the entire study. Patients without RF at day 70 of induction are assigned to one of two consolidation groups based on response: Group C (CR): Patients receive consolidation chemotherapy as in group A. Group D (PR, HI, or SD): Patients receive no further treatment. Patients may be eligible to receive MOAB HuM195 on PDL Study 195-302. Patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year, and then every 6 months thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A maximum of 200 patients (100 per arm) will be accrued for this study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| lintuzumab | Biological | – |
| cytarabine | Drug | – |
| etoposide | Drug | – |
| mitoxantrone hydrochloride | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Nov 2013.
Related trials for Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 1
Vididencel in CML-CP Patients With MRD
CML (Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daniel Levitt, MD, PhD study chair
Facet Biotech
59 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing lintuzumab, cytarabine and etoposide in people with Leukemia, run by Facet Biotech at 59 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Nov 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 59 sites in United States, Germany, Canada, United Kingdom, Belgium and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Nov 2013.