Lung DiseasesNCT00005683
Clinical Interventions in Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Neonatal Lung Injury - SCOR in Lung Biology and Diseases in Infants and Children
An observational study of Lung Diseases and Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by University of Rochester.
Trial summary
To conduct clinical interventions directed at neonatal lung disease and injury, with a focus on infants having surfactant-deficiency or inactivation as a component of pathophysiology. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Diseases, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Dec 1986to Nov 1997
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
No eligibility criteria
About this study
To conduct clinical interventions directed at neonatal lung disease and injury, with a focus on infants having surfactant-deficiency or inactivation as a component of pathophysiology. A major emphasis was on the surfactant-deficient Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) of premature infants, and on acute neonatal respiratory failure in term infants with pulmonary edema and potential surfactant inactivation (ARDS-related).
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND:
The study was a subproject within a Specialized Center of Research (SCOR) in Lung Biology and Diseases in Infants and Children. The clinical interventions studied had significance for respiratory distress syndrome of the newborn and for bronchopulmonary dysplasia, which is the chronic lung disorder of fibrosis, alveolar loss and reactive airway disease that often follows pulmonary disease requiring treatment with oxygen and mechanical ventilation in the newborn period.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
A series of randomized, controlled trials/studies were conducted. In the first clinical study, full term infants with severe respiratory pathology where surfactant inactivation was important were assigned randomly to exogenous surfactant versus control groups to determine if surfactant was efficacious and safe in this kind of lung injury. In the second study, infants of less than 29 weeks gestation received prophylactic exogenous surfactant, but were assigned randomly to receive it immediately following birth or after initial stabilization at 10-15 minutes, to address a then critical current issue in surfactant therapy for RDS. In the third study, infants who had moderate RDS despite exogenous surfactant therapy were randomly assigned to high frequency jet or conventional ventilation groups to determine if this mode of ventilation therapy would reduce barotrauma and the incidence and/or severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). In addition to these three clinical trials, another study involved therapy using superoxide dismutase (SOD) along with surfactant as a multi-modal approach treating premature infants with RDS and lung injury secondary to hyperoxia and mechanical ventilation. This study depended on results of animal studies with SOD in Project 5. Finally, the study addressed the long term evaluation and surveillance of survival, rehospitalizations, health status, pulmonary sequelae, and school performance of those infants enrolled in the randomized clinical trials, as necessary for long-term outcome assessments.
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Diseases, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 May 2000 (estimated)
- Study startDec 1986
- Study completionNov 1997
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lung DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of RochesterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Rochester
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00005683
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 4094
- Other IDs
- P50HL036543
- Status last verified
- Jan 2016
- First submitted
- 25 May 2000
- Last updated
- 15 Jan 2016
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jan 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Interventions in Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Neonatal Lung Injury - SCOR in Lung Biology and Diseases in Infants and Children
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00005683
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 4094
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- University of RochesterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Study start
- Dec 1986
- Study completion
- Nov 1997
- First posted
- 26 May 2000 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To conduct clinical interventions directed at neonatal lung disease and injury, with a focus on infants having surfactant-deficiency or inactivation as a component of pathophysiology. A major emphasis was on the surfactant-deficient Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) of premature infants, and on acute neonatal respiratory failure in term infants with pulmonary edema and potential surfactant inactivation (ARDS-related).
Detailed description
BACKGROUND:
The study was a subproject within a Specialized Center of Research (SCOR) in Lung Biology and Diseases in Infants and Children. The clinical interventions studied had significance for respiratory distress syndrome of the newborn and for bronchopulmonary dysplasia, which is the chronic lung disorder of fibrosis, alveolar loss and reactive airway disease that often follows pulmonary disease requiring treatment with oxygen and mechanical ventilation in the newborn period.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
A series of randomized, controlled trials/studies were conducted. In the first clinical study, full term infants with severe respiratory pathology where surfactant inactivation was important were assigned randomly to exogenous surfactant versus control groups to determine if surfactant was efficacious and safe in this kind of lung injury. In the second study, infants of less than 29 weeks gestation received prophylactic exogenous surfactant, but were assigned randomly to receive it immediately following birth or after initial stabilization at 10-15 minutes, to address a then critical current issue in surfactant therapy for RDS. In the third study, infants who had moderate RDS despite exogenous surfactant therapy were randomly assigned to high frequency jet or conventional ventilation groups to determine if this mode of ventilation therapy would reduce barotrauma and the incidence and/or severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). In addition to these three clinical trials, another study involved therapy using superoxide dismutase (SOD) along with surfactant as a multi-modal approach treating premature infants with RDS and lung injury secondary to hyperoxia and mechanical ventilation. This study depended on results of animal studies with SOD in Project 5. Finally, the study addressed the long term evaluation and surveillance of survival, rehospitalizations, health status, pulmonary sequelae, and school performance of those infants enrolled in the randomized clinical trials, as necessary for long-term outcome assessments.
Study design
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jan 2016.
Related trials for Lung Diseases
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Lung Diseases and Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by University of Rochester.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jan 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jan 2016.