Cardiovascular DiseasesNCT00005507
Race and the Use of Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures
An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Heart Diseases, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
Trial summary
To study the causes of persistent differences in Black-white access to tertiary care cardiovascular surgical services (TCCS). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 100 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases, Coronary Disease
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Mar 1998to Mar 2000
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 100 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
No eligibility criteria
About this study
To study the causes of persistent differences in Black-white access to tertiary care cardiovascular surgical services (TCCS).
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND:
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death among adults in the United States. Although not long ago it was widely believed that African-Americans had a lower incidence of cardiovascular disease than whites, few now believe this to be the case. However, despite parity in the incidence of cardiovascular disease, there remains a substantial Black-white difference in the utilization of tertiary care cardiovascular services (TCCS), such as coronary angiography (CA), coronary bypass surgery (CABG) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Race differences have been found with great consistency across studies of varying design.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
The study used a retrospective quasi-experimental population-based epidemiology design to examine the characteristics of the health care provider and the individual patient that account for utilization of TCCS. The study had four specific aims: 1) to determine the patient and provider characteristics exclusive of symptomatology that predict Black-white differences in referral for coronary angiography; 2) to determine, for patients who are referred for coronary angiography, the patient and provider characteristics that predict Black-white differences in receipt of coronary angiography; 3) to determine the patient and provider characteristics exclusive of symptomatology that predict Black-white difference in referral for CABG and PTCA; 4) to determine, for patients who are referred for CABG or PTCA, the patient and provider characteristics that predict Black-white differences in receipt of CABG and PTCA.
The hospital records of every 1996 cardiac discharge from each of three Baltimore-area hospitals are reviewed to assign each patient to one of three classes. These classes reflect the medical appropriateness of coronary angiography as estimated by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association. All patients in class 1 (indicating general agreement that coronary angiography is indicated) are interviewed by telephone to ascertain barriers to utilization and other factors that may contribute to the use of services. In addition, a stratified sample of 16 class 1 subjects are interviewed in depth. An estimated 400 referring physicians are surveyed to develop a typology of physician practice patterns. Results from patient surveys, physician surveys, and medical record reviews are merged to form the analytical database.
The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "End Date" entered in the Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) record.
- Conditions
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases, Coronary Disease
- Medical subject headings
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases, Coronary Disease
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 May 2000 (estimated)
- Study startMar 1998
- Study completionMar 2000
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiovascular DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00005507
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 5025
- Other IDs
- R01HL059621
- Status last verified
- Apr 2002
- First submitted
- 25 May 2000
- Last updated
- 18 Feb 2016
- Results posted
- No
Publications
LaVeist TA, Nickerson KJ, Bowie JV. Attitudes about racism, medical mistrust, and satisfaction with care among African American and white cardiac patients. Med Care Res Rev. 2000;57 Suppl 1:146-61. doi: 10.1177/1077558700057001S07.
PubMed 11092161
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Feb 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Race and the Use of Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00005507
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 5025
- Conditions
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases, Coronary Disease
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)US National Institutes of Health
- Study start
- Mar 1998
- Study completion
- Mar 2000 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 May 2000 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To study the causes of persistent differences in Black-white access to tertiary care cardiovascular surgical services (TCCS).
Detailed description
BACKGROUND:
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death among adults in the United States. Although not long ago it was widely believed that African-Americans had a lower incidence of cardiovascular disease than whites, few now believe this to be the case. However, despite parity in the incidence of cardiovascular disease, there remains a substantial Black-white difference in the utilization of tertiary care cardiovascular services (TCCS), such as coronary angiography (CA), coronary bypass surgery (CABG) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Race differences have been found with great consistency across studies of varying design.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
The study used a retrospective quasi-experimental population-based epidemiology design to examine the characteristics of the health care provider and the individual patient that account for utilization of TCCS. The study had four specific aims: 1) to determine the patient and provider characteristics exclusive of symptomatology that predict Black-white differences in referral for coronary angiography; 2) to determine, for patients who are referred for coronary angiography, the patient and provider characteristics that predict Black-white differences in receipt of coronary angiography; 3) to determine the patient and provider characteristics exclusive of symptomatology that predict Black-white difference in referral for CABG and PTCA; 4) to determine, for patients who are referred for CABG or PTCA, the patient and provider characteristics that predict Black-white differences in receipt of CABG and PTCA.
The hospital records of every 1996 cardiac discharge from each of three Baltimore-area hospitals are reviewed to assign each patient to one of three classes. These classes reflect the medical appropriateness of coronary angiography as estimated by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association. All patients in class 1 (indicating general agreement that coronary angiography is indicated) are interviewed by telephone to ascertain barriers to utilization and other factors that may contribute to the use of services. In addition, a stratified sample of 16 class 1 subjects are interviewed in depth. An estimated 400 referring physicians are surveyed to develop a typology of physician practice patterns. Results from patient surveys, physician surveys, and medical record reviews are merged to form the analytical database.
The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "End Date" entered in the Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) record.
Study design
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 100 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Feb 2016.
- Background: PubMed 11092161LaVeist TA, Nickerson KJ, Bowie JV. Attitudes about racism, medical mistrust, and satisfaction with care among African American and white cardiac patients. Med Care Res Rev. 2000;57 Suppl 1:146-61. doi: 10.1177/1077558700057001S07.
Related trials for Cardiovascular Diseases
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
ENDOTHELION Study Group: Effect of Bosentan in NAION Patients
Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Heart Diseases, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00005507, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Feb 2016.