Cardiovascular DiseasesNCT00005389
Effect of Drug Therapy on Reinfarction Risk in Women
An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Myocardial Infarction, run by University of Washington.
Trial summary
To evaluate the safety of calcium-channel blockers in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction in women. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 100 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Myocardial Infarction, Heart Diseases
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Sep 1995to Aug 1998
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 100 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
No eligibility criteria
About this study
To evaluate the safety of calcium-channel blockers in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction in women.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND:
Research on heart disease in the 196Os and 197Os was primarily concerned with risk factors for 'premature' atherosclerosis, which was most dramatically apparent in working middle-aged men who suffered heart attacks or died suddenly. This focus on 'premature' disease was an important initial step, but it resulted in a relative neglect of studies in older adults and in all women. Coronary heart disease remains nonetheless a major cause of morbidity and mortality among women.
Given the consistent findings from clinical trials that calcium-channel blockers administered following myocardial infarction do not decrease the risk of death or reinfarction, and that some drugs of this class may actually increase the risk, it is unlikely that future trials of this therapy in women will be conducted. Yet the calcium-channel blockers are used with increasing frequency in women following myocardial infarction. The only ethical method of conducting studies of the safety of these drugs in women is through observational studies. Data from the study can help to guide clinical practice and can assist in the design of appropriate secondary prevention trials in women.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
On-going studies of hormone-replacement therapy in women at Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound (GHC) identified all female enrollees who suffered a first heart attack since 1986; the study expanded this inception cohort through 1996. Information from medical record review and GHC databases were used to assess risk factors and co-morbid conditions, both at entry into the cohort and up to ten years of follow-up, and to identify recurrent cardiovascular events and deaths. A complete record of prescription drug exposure during the follow-up period was obtained for each subject from the GHC computerized pharmacy database. Although the main hypothesis related to reinfarction risk in women, men were studied as well to facilitate comparison of the results of this observational study with those of the clinical trials. According to conservative estimates of the available sample size, the investigators had 86 percent power to detect a relative risk of 1.45 in women alone, and 85 percent power to detect a relative risk of 1.25 in men and women combined, for the association of calcium-channel blocker use with fatal or non-fatal reinfarction. The study also examined the safety and efficacy of other cardiovascular drugs commonly used in women after myocardial infarction, including angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitors, lipid-lowering drugs, and estrogen replacement therapy.
- Medical subject headings
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Myocardial Infarction, Heart Diseases
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 May 2000 (estimated)
- Study startSep 1995
- Study completionAug 1998
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiovascular DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of WashingtonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Washington
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00005389
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 4295
- Other IDs
- R01HL053375
- Status last verified
- Apr 2001
- First submitted
- 25 May 2000
- Last updated
- 10 Feb 2016
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Heckbert SR, Weiss NS, Koepsell TD, Lemaitre RN, Smith NL, Siscovick DS, Lin D, Psaty BM. Duration of estrogen replacement therapy in relation to the risk of incident myocardial infarction in postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med. 1997 Jun 23;157(12):1330-6.
PubMed 9201007Kaplan RC, Heckbert SR, Weiss NS, Wahl PW, Smith NL, Newton KM, Psaty BM. Postmenopausal estrogens and risk of myocardial infarction in diabetic women. Diabetes Care. 1998 Jul;21(7):1117-21. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.7.1117.
PubMed 9653605
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Feb 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Drug Therapy on Reinfarction Risk in Women
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00005389
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 4295
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- University of WashingtonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Study start
- Sep 1995
- Study completion
- Aug 1998
- First posted
- 26 May 2000 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To evaluate the safety of calcium-channel blockers in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction in women.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND:
Research on heart disease in the 196Os and 197Os was primarily concerned with risk factors for 'premature' atherosclerosis, which was most dramatically apparent in working middle-aged men who suffered heart attacks or died suddenly. This focus on 'premature' disease was an important initial step, but it resulted in a relative neglect of studies in older adults and in all women. Coronary heart disease remains nonetheless a major cause of morbidity and mortality among women.
Given the consistent findings from clinical trials that calcium-channel blockers administered following myocardial infarction do not decrease the risk of death or reinfarction, and that some drugs of this class may actually increase the risk, it is unlikely that future trials of this therapy in women will be conducted. Yet the calcium-channel blockers are used with increasing frequency in women following myocardial infarction. The only ethical method of conducting studies of the safety of these drugs in women is through observational studies. Data from the study can help to guide clinical practice and can assist in the design of appropriate secondary prevention trials in women.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
On-going studies of hormone-replacement therapy in women at Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound (GHC) identified all female enrollees who suffered a first heart attack since 1986; the study expanded this inception cohort through 1996. Information from medical record review and GHC databases were used to assess risk factors and co-morbid conditions, both at entry into the cohort and up to ten years of follow-up, and to identify recurrent cardiovascular events and deaths. A complete record of prescription drug exposure during the follow-up period was obtained for each subject from the GHC computerized pharmacy database. Although the main hypothesis related to reinfarction risk in women, men were studied as well to facilitate comparison of the results of this observational study with those of the clinical trials. According to conservative estimates of the available sample size, the investigators had 86 percent power to detect a relative risk of 1.45 in women alone, and 85 percent power to detect a relative risk of 1.25 in men and women combined, for the association of calcium-channel blocker use with fatal or non-fatal reinfarction. The study also examined the safety and efficacy of other cardiovascular drugs commonly used in women after myocardial infarction, including angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitors, lipid-lowering drugs, and estrogen replacement therapy.
Study design
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 100 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Feb 2016.
- Background: PubMed 9201007Heckbert SR, Weiss NS, Koepsell TD, Lemaitre RN, Smith NL, Siscovick DS, Lin D, Psaty BM. Duration of estrogen replacement therapy in relation to the risk of incident myocardial infarction in postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med. 1997 Jun 23;157(12):1330-6.
- Background: PubMed 9653605Kaplan RC, Heckbert SR, Weiss NS, Wahl PW, Smith NL, Newton KM, Psaty BM. Postmenopausal estrogens and risk of myocardial infarction in diabetic women. Diabetes Care. 1998 Jul;21(7):1117-21. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.7.1117.
Related trials for Cardiovascular Diseases
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
ENDOTHELION Study Group: Effect of Bosentan in NAION Patients
Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases and Myocardial Infarction, run by University of Washington.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00005389, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2016.