AzTrials
AzTrials

Anemia, Sickle CellNCT00005300

Investigation of Selected Patient Groups From The Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease

An observational study of Anemia, Sickle Cell and Blood Disease, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To continue to follow the newborn cohort and the over-35 years of age cohort from the Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease (CSSCD), a study of the natural history of sickle cell disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 100 years, men only
Conditions the study is for
Anemia, Sickle Cell, Blood Disease
How many people
Not given
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Oct 1988to Jun 1995
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 100 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

No eligibility criteria

About this study

To continue to follow the newborn cohort and the over-35 years of age cohort from the Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease (CSSCD), a study of the natural history of sickle cell disease.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

The Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease was initiated in 1977 to determine the natural history of sickle cell disease from birth to death in order to identify those factors contributing to the morbidity and mortality of the disease. Patients in the study had been followed previously in CSSCD.

Follow-up of the newborn cohort provided data demonstrating that life-threatening septicemia can occur as early as four months of age, and that the incidence of septicemia in children with sickle cell disease is higher than previously reported. Serial measurements of pocked or vesiculated red blood cells determined the onset of splenic dysfunction. The loss of splenic function has been characterized by genotype and the observed patterns of loss of splenic function were different developmentally depending on the sickle hemoglobinopathy syndrome.

Growth retardation, which becomes obvious around seven years of age, has no relationship to reported family income. Prophylactic oral penicillin can decrease morbidity and mortality associate with pneumococcal septicemia. The newborn infant cohort was unique in determining issues related to the natural history of the disease because the information was prospective and has been captured in the database. The complex database permitted an opportunity to determine outcomes, risk factors, and the application of the severity index to determine the spectrum of severity.

Follow-up of the over-35 cohort is important because it was not so long ago that it was estimated that 50 percent of patients with sickle cell anemia in the United States died before their twentieth birthday. However, data accumulated over the past eight years by the CSSCD demonstrates that this is incorrect. Survival beyond the age of forty suggests that surviving patients are somehow different from other patients with a high mortality in the earlier years. Therefore, they constitute a cohort of special interest, and the reasons for prolonged survival in this disease remain to be well documented prospectively. Technology is now available to identify genetic differences which may influence survival.

Based on the findings of the earlier CSSCD, the Blood Diseases and Resources Advisory Committee Red Cell Working Group recommended this initiative which was approved by the May 1987 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Advisory Council. The Request for Proposals was released in February 1988 and awards made in October 1988.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

Follow-up of the newborn cohort continued in order to better understand the severity, onset of early organ damage, and risk factors. Patients were given an entry evaluation consisting of interim history, complete physical examination, complete blood count, urinalysis, blood drawn for haplotype determination and for the serum bank, magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, pulmonary function tests with arterial blood gas, and psychomotor tests. Patients had interim assessments at six months and annual assessments as well as an exit assessment in the fourth or fifth years. The exit assessment was the same as the entry assessment.

Follow-up of the over-35 cohort continued in order to better understand factors that contribute to longevity. Entry evaluation consisted of interim history, complete physical examination, complete blood count, urinalysis, blood drawn for haplotype determination and for the serum bank, cardiac MUGA, and renal and pulmonary function tests. Follow-up was yearly with an exit evaluation in the fourth or fifth years.

Medical subject headings
Anemia, Sickle Cell, Hematologic Diseases

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 May 2000 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 1988
  3. Study completionJun 1995

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00005300
Sponsor's protocol ID
3001
Status last verified
May 2000
First submitted
25 May 2000
Last updated
14 Apr 2016
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Gill FM, Brown A, Gallagher D, Diamond S, Goins E, Grover R, Lubin B, Moore G, Gaston MH. Newborn experience in the Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease. Pediatrics. 1989 May;83(5 Pt 2):827-9. No abstract available.

    PubMed 2654872

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Anemia, Sickle Cell and Blood Disease, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00005300, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Apr 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in