Prostate CancerPhase 3NCT00003290
Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Prostate Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing gonadotrophin releasing hormone and radiation therapy in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Medical Research Council at 19 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not yet known whether standard radiation therapy is more effective than high-dose radiation therapy in treating patients with prostate cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- gonadotrophin releasing hormone and radiation therapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 800 participants
- Where
- 19 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 1998to Aug 2004
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically confirmed prostate cancer
- T1b-T3a, N0, M0 (stage II or III)
- Prostate-specific antigen at least 50 ng/mL
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
- Not specified
Performance status:
- WHO 0-1
Life expectancy:
- Not specified
Hematopoietic:
- WBC greater than 4,000/mm^3
- Platelet count greater than 100,000/mm^3
- Hemoglobin greater than 11 g/dL
Hepatic:
- Not specified
Renal:
- Not specified
Other:
- No significant past medical history that would preclude radical radiotherapy
- No condition that would preclude standard radiotherapy
- No hip prosthesis
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy:
- Not specified
Chemotherapy:
- Not specified
Endocrine therapy:
- No prior androgen deprivation therapy
Radiotherapy:
- No prior pelvic radiotherapy
Surgery:
- No prior radical prostatectomy
Trial locations and contacts
19 sites in 2 countries.
19 sites in 2 countries
United Kingdom18 sites
University of Birmingham
Birmingham, England, B15 2TT
Bristol Royal Hospital for Children
Bristol, England, BS2 8BJ
Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre
Bristol, England, BS2 8ED
Derbyshire Royal Infirmary
Derby, England, DE1 2QY
Royal Hospital for Sick Children
Edinburgh, Scotland
Beatson Oncology Centre
Glasgow, Scotland, G11 6NT
Cookridge Hospital
Leeds, England, LS16 6QB
University Hospitals of Leicester
Leicester, England, LE1 5WW
Middlesex Hospital- Meyerstein Institute
London, England, WIT 3AA
Christie Hospital N.H.S. Trust
Manchester, England, M20 4BX
Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology NHS Trust
Merseyside, England, L63 4JY
Newcastle General Hospital
Newcastle upon Tyne, England, NE4 6BE
Mount Vernon Hospital
Northwood, England, HA6 2RN
Norfolk & Norwich Hospital
Norwich, England, NR1 3SR
Oxford Radcliffe Hospital
Oxford, England, 0X3 9DU
Royal Preston Hospital
Preston, PR2 9HT
Royal Marsden Hospital
Sutton, England, SM2 5PT
Southend NHS Trust Hospital
Westcliff-on-Sea, England
About this study
Official title: A Randomised Trial of High Dose Therapy in Localised Cancer of the Prostate Using Conformal Radiotherapy Techniques
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not yet known whether standard radiation therapy is more effective than high-dose radiation therapy in treating patients with prostate cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of standard radiation therapy with that of high-dose radiation therapy in treating patients with stage II or stage III prostate cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare local tumor control in patients with stage II or III prostate cancer treated with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy with standard vs high-dose conformal radiotherapy.
- Compare the incidence of biochemical failure (prostate-specific antigen (PSA) greater than 2 ng/mL at 6 or more months after initiation of radiotherapy and PSA rising from nadir level by at least 50%), development of metastases, and survival in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the acute and late radiation-induced side effects of these regimens in this patient population.
- Compare aspects of quality of life, health economics, models of normal tissue, and tumor control in patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to prostate-specific antigen, T stage, and Gleason score. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.
All patients receive neoadjuvant androgen deprivation with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists every 4 weeks beginning 3-6 months before initiation of radiotherapy and continuing until completion of radiotherapy.
- Arm I: Patients undergo standard conformal radiotherapy for 6.5 weeks.
- Arm II: Patients undergo high-dose conformal radiotherapy for 7.5 weeks. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually thereafter.
Patients are followed every 6 months for 2 years and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 800 patients will be accrued for this study.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- gonadotrophin releasing hormone, radiation therapy
- Keywords
- stage IIB prostate cancer, stage IIA prostate cancer, stage III prostate cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
gonadotrophin releasing hormoneBiological
radiation therapyRadiation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Apr 2003 (estimated)
- Study startJan 1998
- Study completionAug 2004
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Enrolment
- 800 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical Research Council
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Investigators
- David P. Dearnaley, MD, FRCP, FRCR, Study chair, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003290
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000066222
- Other IDs
- MRC-RT01, EU-98005
- Status last verified
- Jul 2001
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 4 Dec 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
South CP, Khoo VS, Naismith O, Norman A, Dearnaley DP. A comparison of treatment planning techniques used in two randomised UK external beam radiotherapy trials for localised prostate cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2008 Feb;20(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2007.10.012. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
PubMed 18054471van As N, South C, Naismith O, et al.: Radiotherapy planning in UK phase III trials of dose-escalated (MRC RT01) and high-dose hypofractionated radiotherapy (CHHIP) in prostate cancer. [Abstract] 2006 Prostate Cancer Symposium, February 24-26, 2006, San Francisco, CA. A-98, 2006.
Mayles WP, Moore AR, Aird EG, Bidmead AM, Dearnaley DP, Griffiths SE, Warrington AP; RT01 collaborators. Questionnaire based quality assurance for the RT01 trial of dose escalation in conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer (ISRCTN 47772397). Radiother Oncol. 2004 Nov;73(2):199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.08.017.
PubMed 15622611Sydes MR, Stephens RJ, Moore AR, Aird EG, Bidmead AM, Fallowfield LJ, Graham J, Griffiths S, Mayles WP, McGuire A, Stanley S, Warrington AP, Dearnaley DP; RT01 collaborators. Implementing the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) RT01 trial (ISRCTN 47772397): methods and practicalities of a randomised controlled trial of conformal radiotherapy in men with localised prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2004 Aug;72(2):199-211. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.04.007.
PubMed 15297138Gulliford SL, Partridge M, Sydes MR, Webb S, Evans PM, Dearnaley DP. Parameters for the Lyman Kutcher Burman (LKB) model of Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) for specific rectal complications observed in clinical practise. Radiother Oncol. 2012 Mar;102(3):347-51. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.10.022. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
PubMed 22119373Barnett GC, De Meerleer G, Gulliford SL, Sydes MR, Elliott RM, Dearnaley DP. The impact of clinical factors on the development of late radiation toxicity: results from the Medical Research Council RT01 trial (ISRCTN47772397). Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2011 Nov;23(9):613-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
PubMed 21470834Gulliford SL, Foo K, Morgan RC, Aird EG, Bidmead AM, Critchley H, Evans PM, Gianolini S, Mayles WP, Moore AR, Sanchez-Nieto B, Partridge M, Sydes MR, Webb S, Dearnaley DP. Dose-volume constraints to reduce rectal side effects from prostate radiotherapy: evidence from MRC RT01 Trial ISRCTN 47772397. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3):747-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.025. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
PubMed 19540054Syndikus I, Morgan RC, Sydes MR, Graham JD, Dearnaley DP; MRC RT01 collaborators. Late gastrointestinal toxicity after dose-escalated conformal radiotherapy for early prostate cancer: results from the UK Medical Research Council RT01 trial (ISRCTN47772397). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jul 1;77(3):773-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.052. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
PubMed 19836155Stanley S, Griffiths S, Sydes MR, Moore AR, Syndikus I, Dearnaley DP; RT01 Radiographer Trial Implementation Group. Accuracy and reproducibility of conformal radiotherapy using data from a randomised controlled trial of conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer (MRC RT01, ISRCTN47772397). Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2008 Oct;20(8):582-90. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2008.04.019. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
PubMed 18565744Dearnaley DP, Sydes MR, Graham JD, Aird EG, Bottomley D, Cowan RA, Huddart RA, Jose CC, Matthews JH, Millar J, Moore AR, Morgan RC, Russell JM, Scrase CD, Stephens RJ, Syndikus I, Parmar MK; RT01 collaborators. Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Jun;8(6):475-87. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70143-2.
PubMed 17482880Dearnaley DP, Sydes MR, Langley RE, Graham JD, Huddart RA, Syndikus I, Matthews JH, Scrase CD, Jose CC, Logue J, Stephens RJ; RT01 Collaborators. The early toxicity of escalated versus standard dose conformal radiotherapy with neo-adjuvant androgen suppression for patients with localised prostate cancer: results from the MRC RT01 trial (ISRCTN47772397). Radiother Oncol. 2007 Apr;83(1):31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.02.014. Epub 2007 Mar 27.
PubMed 17391791Mangar SA, Sydes MR, Tucker HL, Coffey J, Sohaib SA, Gianolini S, Webb S, Khoo VS; MRC RT01 Trial Management Group; Dearnaley DP. Evaluating the relationship between erectile dysfunction and dose received by the penile bulb: using data from a randomised controlled trial of conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer (MRC RT01, ISRCTN47772397). Radiother Oncol. 2006 Sep;80(3):355-62. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.07.037. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
PubMed 16949694Dearnaley DP, Hall E, Lawrence D, Huddart RA, Eeles R, Nutting CM, Gadd J, Warrington A, Bidmead M, Horwich A. Phase III pilot study of dose escalation using conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: PSA control and side effects. Br J Cancer. 2005 Feb 14;92(3):488-98. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602301.
PubMed 15685244Stephen M, Helen T, Matthew S, et al.: Evaluating the relationship between erectile dysfunction and dose received by the penile bulb in patients undergoing conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: analysis of data from the MRC RT01 dose escalation trial (ISRCTN47772397). [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63 (2 Suppl 1): A-209, S126, 2005.
Stephens RJ, Cowan R, Dearnaley DP, et al.: The effect of hormone therapy on the quality of life of men with locally advanced prostate cancer (based on data from the MRC RT01 randomised trial (ISRCTN 47772397)). [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22: A-1665, 414, 2003.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Dec 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised Trial of High Dose Therapy in Localised Cancer of the Prostate Using Conformal Radiotherapy Techniques
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003290
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000066222
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- stage IIB prostate cancer, stage IIA prostate cancer, stage III prostate cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 800 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical Research CouncilOther government
- Study start
- Jan 1998
- Study completion
- Aug 2004 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Apr 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not yet known whether standard radiation therapy is more effective than high-dose radiation therapy in treating patients with prostate cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of standard radiation therapy with that of high-dose radiation therapy in treating patients with stage II or stage III prostate cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare local tumor control in patients with stage II or III prostate cancer treated with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy with standard vs high-dose conformal radiotherapy.
- Compare the incidence of biochemical failure (prostate-specific antigen (PSA) greater than 2 ng/mL at 6 or more months after initiation of radiotherapy and PSA rising from nadir level by at least 50%), development of metastases, and survival in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the acute and late radiation-induced side effects of these regimens in this patient population.
- Compare aspects of quality of life, health economics, models of normal tissue, and tumor control in patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to prostate-specific antigen, T stage, and Gleason score. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.
All patients receive neoadjuvant androgen deprivation with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists every 4 weeks beginning 3-6 months before initiation of radiotherapy and continuing until completion of radiotherapy.
- Arm I: Patients undergo standard conformal radiotherapy for 6.5 weeks.
- Arm II: Patients undergo high-dose conformal radiotherapy for 7.5 weeks. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually thereafter.
Patients are followed every 6 months for 2 years and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 800 patients will be accrued for this study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| gonadotrophin releasing hormone | Biological | – |
| radiation therapy | Radiation | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Dec 2013.
- Background: PubMed 18054471South CP, Khoo VS, Naismith O, Norman A, Dearnaley DP. A comparison of treatment planning techniques used in two randomised UK external beam radiotherapy trials for localised prostate cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2008 Feb;20(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2007.10.012. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
- Backgroundvan As N, South C, Naismith O, et al.: Radiotherapy planning in UK phase III trials of dose-escalated (MRC RT01) and high-dose hypofractionated radiotherapy (CHHIP) in prostate cancer. [Abstract] 2006 Prostate Cancer Symposium, February 24-26, 2006, San Francisco, CA. A-98, 2006.
- Background: PubMed 15622611Mayles WP, Moore AR, Aird EG, Bidmead AM, Dearnaley DP, Griffiths SE, Warrington AP; RT01 collaborators. Questionnaire based quality assurance for the RT01 trial of dose escalation in conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer (ISRCTN 47772397). Radiother Oncol. 2004 Nov;73(2):199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.08.017.
- Background: PubMed 15297138Sydes MR, Stephens RJ, Moore AR, Aird EG, Bidmead AM, Fallowfield LJ, Graham J, Griffiths S, Mayles WP, McGuire A, Stanley S, Warrington AP, Dearnaley DP; RT01 collaborators. Implementing the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) RT01 trial (ISRCTN 47772397): methods and practicalities of a randomised controlled trial of conformal radiotherapy in men with localised prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2004 Aug;72(2):199-211. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.04.007.
- Results publication: PubMed 22119373Gulliford SL, Partridge M, Sydes MR, Webb S, Evans PM, Dearnaley DP. Parameters for the Lyman Kutcher Burman (LKB) model of Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) for specific rectal complications observed in clinical practise. Radiother Oncol. 2012 Mar;102(3):347-51. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.10.022. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 21470834Barnett GC, De Meerleer G, Gulliford SL, Sydes MR, Elliott RM, Dearnaley DP. The impact of clinical factors on the development of late radiation toxicity: results from the Medical Research Council RT01 trial (ISRCTN47772397). Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2011 Nov;23(9):613-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
- Results publication: PubMed 19540054Gulliford SL, Foo K, Morgan RC, Aird EG, Bidmead AM, Critchley H, Evans PM, Gianolini S, Mayles WP, Moore AR, Sanchez-Nieto B, Partridge M, Sydes MR, Webb S, Dearnaley DP. Dose-volume constraints to reduce rectal side effects from prostate radiotherapy: evidence from MRC RT01 Trial ISRCTN 47772397. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3):747-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.025. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
- Results publication: PubMed 19836155Syndikus I, Morgan RC, Sydes MR, Graham JD, Dearnaley DP; MRC RT01 collaborators. Late gastrointestinal toxicity after dose-escalated conformal radiotherapy for early prostate cancer: results from the UK Medical Research Council RT01 trial (ISRCTN47772397). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jul 1;77(3):773-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.052. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
- Results publication: PubMed 18565744Stanley S, Griffiths S, Sydes MR, Moore AR, Syndikus I, Dearnaley DP; RT01 Radiographer Trial Implementation Group. Accuracy and reproducibility of conformal radiotherapy using data from a randomised controlled trial of conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer (MRC RT01, ISRCTN47772397). Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2008 Oct;20(8):582-90. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2008.04.019. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
- Results publication: PubMed 17482880Dearnaley DP, Sydes MR, Graham JD, Aird EG, Bottomley D, Cowan RA, Huddart RA, Jose CC, Matthews JH, Millar J, Moore AR, Morgan RC, Russell JM, Scrase CD, Stephens RJ, Syndikus I, Parmar MK; RT01 collaborators. Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Jun;8(6):475-87. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70143-2.
- Results publication: PubMed 17391791Dearnaley DP, Sydes MR, Langley RE, Graham JD, Huddart RA, Syndikus I, Matthews JH, Scrase CD, Jose CC, Logue J, Stephens RJ; RT01 Collaborators. The early toxicity of escalated versus standard dose conformal radiotherapy with neo-adjuvant androgen suppression for patients with localised prostate cancer: results from the MRC RT01 trial (ISRCTN47772397). Radiother Oncol. 2007 Apr;83(1):31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.02.014. Epub 2007 Mar 27.
- Results publication: PubMed 16949694Mangar SA, Sydes MR, Tucker HL, Coffey J, Sohaib SA, Gianolini S, Webb S, Khoo VS; MRC RT01 Trial Management Group; Dearnaley DP. Evaluating the relationship between erectile dysfunction and dose received by the penile bulb: using data from a randomised controlled trial of conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer (MRC RT01, ISRCTN47772397). Radiother Oncol. 2006 Sep;80(3):355-62. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.07.037. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David P. Dearnaley, MD, FRCP, FRCR study chair
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
19 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing gonadotrophin releasing hormone and radiation therapy in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Medical Research Council at 19 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Dec 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 19 sites in United Kingdom, South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00003290, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Dec 2013.