LymphomaPhase 3NCT00003150
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
A Phase 3 study testing rituximab, CHOP regimen and cyclophosphamide in people with Lymphoma, run by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group at 91 sites in United States.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab can locate tumor cells and either kill them or deliver tumor-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lymphoma
- What is being tested?
- rituximab, CHOP regimen and cyclophosphamide
- How many people
- 630 participants
- Where
- 91 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 1997to Sep 2006
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically proven intermediate or high grade B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (other than Burkitt's, non-Burkitt's, undifferentiated, or lymphoblastic lymphoma) B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma positive for CD19 and/or CD20 by slide-based immunohistochemistry or flow cytometry No mantle cell or follicular lymphoma Measurable disease, defined by at least one of the following: Physical examination Radiographic findings of at least 2 dimensions Bidimensional measurable defect or mass measuring at least 2 cm in diameter on radionuclide or CT scan Enlarged spleen extending at least 2 cm below the costal margin provided that there is no other likely explanation besides lymphomatous involvement Enlarged liver extending at least 5 cm below the costal margin along with biopsy-proven lymphomatous hepatic involvement No history of transformed lymphoma No known posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder No CNS involvement CALGB patients 60-65 years of age must not be eligible for any other study of higher priority A new classification scheme for adult non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has been adopted by PDQ. The terminology of "indolent" or "aggressive" lymphoma will replace the former terminology of "low", "intermediate", or "high" grade lymphoma. However, this protocol uses the former terminology.
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: See Disease Characteristics 60 and over Performance status: ECOG 0-3 Life expectancy: Not specified Hematopoietic: Absolute granulocyte count at least 1,500/mm3 (unless due to lymphoma) Platelet count greater than 100,000/mm3 (unless due to lymphoma) Hepatic: Bilirubin no greater than 3.0 mg/dL Renal: Creatinine less than 2.1 mg/dL OR Creatinine clearance at least 60 mL/min Cardiovascular: No active heart disease including congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction within the past 3 months, or symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia LVEF at least 45% if prior history of heart disease exists Other: HIV negative No other malignancy within the past 5 years except squamous cell or basal cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: See Disease Characteristics No prior biologic response modifier therapy No prior immunotherapy No prior rituximab Chemotherapy: No prior cytotoxic chemotherapy No concurrent dexrazoxane Endocrine therapy: Prior corticosteroids allowed Radiotherapy: No prior radiotherapy No prior radioimmunotherapy Surgery: Not specified
Trial locations and contacts
91 sites in 1 country.
91 sites in 1 country
United States91 sites
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Albuquerque
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108-5138
MBCCOP - University of New Mexico HSC
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Ann Arbor
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105
CCOP - Ann Arbor Regional
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-0752
CCOP - Atlanta Regional
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342-1701
Hematology Oncology Associates
Atlantis, Florida, 33462
CCOP - Montana Cancer Consortium
Billings, Montana, 59101
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Biloxi
Biloxi, Mississippi, 39531-2410
Boston Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
MBCCOP - University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60612-7323
Barrett Cancer Center, The University Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45220-2288
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
CCOP - Columbus
Columbus, Ohio, 43206
Simmons Cancer Center - Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75235-9154
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Dayton
Dayton, Ohio, 45428
CCOP - Central Illinois
Decatur, Illinois, 62526
University of Colorado Cancer Center
Denver, Colorado, 80010
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Denver
Denver, Colorado, 80220
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201-1379
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Detroit
Detroit, Michigan, 48201-1932
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope
Duarte, California, 91010-3000
CCOP - Duluth
Duluth, Minnesota, 55805
Dwight David Eisenhower Army Medical Center
Fort Gordon, Georgia, 30905-5650
Brooke Army Medical Center
Fort Sam Houston, Texas, 78234
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas, 77555-0209
CCOP - Grand Rapids Clinical Oncology Program
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503
CCOP - Greenville
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Hines (Hines Junior VA Hospital)
Hines, Illinois, 60141
Cancer Research Center of Hawaii
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216-4505
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Jackson
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Boston (Jamaica Plain)
Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, 02130
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160-7357
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri, 64128
CCOP - Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri, 64131
Keesler Medical Center - Keesler AFB
Keesler Air Force Base, Mississippi, 39534-2576
CCOP - Dayton
Kettering, Ohio, 45429
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Lexington
Lexington, Kentucky, 40511-1093
Albert B. Chandler Medical Center, University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536-0084
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Little Rock (McClellan)
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Long Beach
Long Beach, California, 90822
USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Hospital
Los Angeles, California, 90033-0804
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - West Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90073
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1781
Texas Tech University Health Science Center
Lubbock, Texas, 79423
Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic - Martinez
Martinez, California, 94553
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
MBCCOP - Gulf Coast
Mobile, Alabama, 36688
MBCCOP - LSU Health Sciences Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
Tulane University School of Medicine
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10032
CCOP - Bay Area Tumor Institute
Oakland, California, 94609-3305
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Oklahoma City
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73190
Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
Orange, California, 92868
CCOP - Greater Phoenix
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006-2726
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Phoenix (Hayden)
Phoenix, Arizona, 85012
Oregon Cancer Center
Portland, Oregon, 97201-3098
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Portland
Portland, Oregon, 97207
CCOP - Columbia River Program
Portland, Oregon, 97213
University of California Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, 95817
Huntsman Cancer Institute
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Salt Lake City
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84148
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78284-7811
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - San Antonio (Murphy)
San Antonio, Texas, 78284
CCOP - Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital
Santa Rosa, California, 95403
CCOP - Virginia Mason Research Center
Seattle, Washington, 98101
Swedish Cancer Institute
Seattle, Washington, 98104
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Seattle
Seattle, Washington, 98108
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center - Shreveport
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71130-3932
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Shreveport
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71130
Providence Hospital - Southfield
Southfield, Michigan, 48075-9975
CCOP - Upstate Carolina
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303
CCOP - Cancer Research for the Ozarks
Springfield, Missouri, 65807
St. Louis University Health Sciences Center
St Louis, Missouri, 63110-0250
CCOP - St. Louis-Cape Girardeau
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
CCOP - Northwest
Tacoma, Washington, 98405-0986
Madigan Army Medical Center
Tacoma, Washington, 98431-5000
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Temple
Temple, Texas, 76504
CCOP - Scott and White Hospital
Temple, Texas, 76508
CCOP - Toledo Community Hospital Oncology Program
Toledo, Ohio, 43623-3456
David Grant Medical Center
Travis Air Force Base, California, 94535
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Tucson
Tucson, Arizona, 85723
Arizona Cancer Center
Tucson, Arizona, 85724
CCOP - Wichita
Wichita, Kansas, 67214-3882
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Wichita
Wichita, Kansas, 67218
CCOP - Southeast Cancer Control Consortium
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27104-4241
About this study
Official title: Phase III Trial of CHOP Versus CHOP and Chimeric Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody (IDEC-C2B8) in Older Patients With Diffuse Mixed, Diffuse Large Cell and Immunoblastic Large Cell Histology Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab can locate tumor cells and either kill them or deliver tumor-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. It is not yet known if combination chemotherapy is more effective with or without rituximab for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy with or without rituximab in treating older patients who have non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the efficacy of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) with or without rituximab in older patients with diffuse mixed, diffuse large, or immunoblastic large cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of B-cell lineage with respect to the response rate, time to treatment failure, toxicity, and survival. II. Compare the efficacy of maintenance therapy consisting of rituximab vs observation alone after initial therapy with respect to the time to treatment failure, duration of response, toxicity, and survival of this patient population. III. Determine if maintenance therapy with rituximab results in the conversion of any partial response to complete response.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. For the first randomization, patients are stratified according to the number of risk factors (0-1 vs 2-4). For the second randomization, in addition to the number of risk factors, patients are stratified according to objective response to initial induction therapy (partial response vs complete response) and induction therapy (CHOP vs CHOP and rituximab). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms. Arm I: Patients receive CHOP chemotherapy comprising cyclophosphamide IV, doxorubicin IV, and vincristine IV on day 1 and oral prednisone on days 1-5. Treatment repeats every 21 days in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Arm II: Patients receive treatment as in arm I. Patients also receive rituximab IV on days -7,-3, 41, and 83. Patients who achieve complete response (CR) after 4 courses of CHOP and remain in CR after 6 courses of CHOP are further randomized to one of two arms. Arm I (Maintenance therapy): Patients receive rituximab IV weekly for 4 weeks. Courses repeat every 6 months for 2 years in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Arm II: Patients are observed. Patients who achieve partial response (PR) after 6 courses OR PR after 4 courses and then CR after 6 courses receive 2 additional courses of CHOP therapy. Patients are then also randomized to receive either maintenance therapy or observation as above. Patients with stable disease or disease progression are removed from the study. Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Approximately 630 patients will be accrued for this study within 4 years.
- Conditions
- Lymphoma
- Being tested
- rituximab, CHOP regimen, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride, prednisone
- Keywords
- stage I adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, stage I adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage I adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, stage III adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, stage III adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage III adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, stage IV adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, stage IV adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage IV adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, contiguous stage II adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, contiguous stage II adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, contiguous stage II adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II adult diffuse large cell lymphoma
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin, Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse, Lymphoma, Large-Cell, Immunoblastic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
rituximabBiological
CHOP regimenDrug
cyclophosphamideDrug
prednisoneDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Feb 2004 (estimated)
- Study startDec 1997
- Study completionSep 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Enrolment
- 630 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cancer and Leukemia Group B, SWOG Cancer Research Network
- Investigators
- Thomas M. Habermann, MD, Study chair, Mayo ClinicVicki A. Morrison, MD, Study chair, Veterans Affairs Medical Center - MinneapolisJames K. Weick, MD, Study chair, Hematology Oncology Associates of the Palm Beaches
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003150
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000065935
- Other IDs
- ECOG-E4494, CLB-9793, SWOG-E4494
- Status last verified
- Aug 2010
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 21 Jun 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Advani RH, Chen H, Habermann TM, Morrison VA, Weller EA, Fisher RI, Peterson BA, Gascoyne RD, Horning SJ; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; Cancer and Leukemia Group B; Southwest Oncology Group. Comparison of conventional prognostic indices in patients older than 60 years with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP in the US Intergroup Study (ECOG 4494, CALGB 9793): consideration of age greater than 70 years in an elderly prognostic index (E-IPI). Br J Haematol. 2010 Oct;151(2):143-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08331.x.
PubMed 20735398Winter JN, Li S, Aurora V, Variakojis D, Nelson B, Krajewska M, Zhang L, Habermann TM, Fisher RI, Macon WR, Chhanabhai M, Felgar RE, Hsi ED, Medeiros LJ, Weick JK, Weller EA, Melnick A, Reed JC, Horning SJ, Gascoyne RD. Expression of p21 protein predicts clinical outcome in DLBCL patients older than 60 years treated with R-CHOP but not CHOP: a prospective ECOG and Southwest Oncology Group correlative study on E4494. Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Apr 15;16(8):2435-42. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1219. Epub 2010 Apr 6.
PubMed 20371683Aurora V, Li S, Horning SJ, et al.: Prognostic significance of p53/p21 expression in DLBCL treated with CHOP or R-CHOP: a correlative study of E4494. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-8038, 450s, 2007.
Morrison VA, Weller EA, Habermann TM, et al.: Maintenance rituximab (MR) compared to observation (OBS) after R-CHOP or CHOP in older patients (pts) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): an Intergroup E4494/C9793 update. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-8011, 443s, 2007.
Advani RH, Chen H, Habermann TM, et al.: Prognostic indices in older DLBCL patients receiving R-CHOP: an analysis of the U.S. Intergroup study (E4494, CALGB 9793). [Abstract] Blood 108 (11): A-813, 2006.
Habermann TM, Weller EA, Morrison VA, Gascoyne RD, Cassileth PA, Cohn JB, Dakhil SR, Woda B, Fisher RI, Peterson BA, Horning SJ. Rituximab-CHOP versus CHOP alone or with maintenance rituximab in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 1;24(19):3121-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.1003. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
PubMed 16754935Winter JN, Weller EA, Horning SJ, Krajewska M, Variakojis D, Habermann TM, Fisher RI, Kurtin PJ, Macon WR, Chhanabhai M, Felgar RE, Hsi ED, Medeiros LJ, Weick JK, Reed JC, Gascoyne RD. Prognostic significance of Bcl-6 protein expression in DLBCL treated with CHOP or R-CHOP: a prospective correlative study. Blood. 2006 Jun 1;107(11):4207-13. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-10-4222. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
PubMed 16449523Morrison V, Weller E, Habermann T, et al.: Dose intensity of CHOP alone or with rituximab in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in patients >60 years of age: an analysis of the intergroup trial ( CALGB 9793, ECOG-SWOG 4494). [Abstract] Ann Oncol 16 (Suppl 5): A-224, v102, 2005.
Habermann TM, Weller E, Morrison VA, et al.: Rituximab-CHOP versus CHOP with or without maintenance rituximab in patients 60 years of age or older with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): an update. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-127, 2004.
Morrison VA, Weller EA, Habermann TM, Li S, Fisher RI, Cheson BD, Peterson BA. Patterns of growth factor usage and febrile neutropenia among older patients with diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with CHOP or R-CHOP: the Intergroup experience (CALGB 9793; ECOG-SWOG 4494). Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 Aug;58(8):1814-1822. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1265111. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
PubMed 27967294
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jun 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase III Trial of CHOP Versus CHOP and Chimeric Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody (IDEC-C2B8) in Older Patients With Diffuse Mixed, Diffuse Large Cell and Immunoblastic Large Cell Histology Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003150
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000065935
- Conditions
- Lymphoma
- Keywords
- stage I adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, stage I adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage I adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, stage III adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, stage III adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage III adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, stage IV adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, stage IV adult diffuse large cell lymphoma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 630 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cancer and Leukemia Group B, SWOG Cancer Research Network
- Study start
- Dec 1997
- Study completion
- Sep 2006 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Feb 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab can locate tumor cells and either kill them or deliver tumor-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. It is not yet known if combination chemotherapy is more effective with or without rituximab for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy with or without rituximab in treating older patients who have non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the efficacy of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) with or without rituximab in older patients with diffuse mixed, diffuse large, or immunoblastic large cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of B-cell lineage with respect to the response rate, time to treatment failure, toxicity, and survival. II. Compare the efficacy of maintenance therapy consisting of rituximab vs observation alone after initial therapy with respect to the time to treatment failure, duration of response, toxicity, and survival of this patient population. III. Determine if maintenance therapy with rituximab results in the conversion of any partial response to complete response.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. For the first randomization, patients are stratified according to the number of risk factors (0-1 vs 2-4). For the second randomization, in addition to the number of risk factors, patients are stratified according to objective response to initial induction therapy (partial response vs complete response) and induction therapy (CHOP vs CHOP and rituximab). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms. Arm I: Patients receive CHOP chemotherapy comprising cyclophosphamide IV, doxorubicin IV, and vincristine IV on day 1 and oral prednisone on days 1-5. Treatment repeats every 21 days in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Arm II: Patients receive treatment as in arm I. Patients also receive rituximab IV on days -7,-3, 41, and 83. Patients who achieve complete response (CR) after 4 courses of CHOP and remain in CR after 6 courses of CHOP are further randomized to one of two arms. Arm I (Maintenance therapy): Patients receive rituximab IV weekly for 4 weeks. Courses repeat every 6 months for 2 years in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Arm II: Patients are observed. Patients who achieve partial response (PR) after 6 courses OR PR after 4 courses and then CR after 6 courses receive 2 additional courses of CHOP therapy. Patients are then also randomized to receive either maintenance therapy or observation as above. Patients with stable disease or disease progression are removed from the study. Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Approximately 630 patients will be accrued for this study within 4 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| rituximab | Biological | – |
| CHOP regimen | Drug | – |
| cyclophosphamide | Drug | – |
| doxorubicin hydrochloride | Drug | – |
| prednisone | Drug | – |
| vincristine sulfate | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jun 2013.
- Results publication: PubMed 20735398Advani RH, Chen H, Habermann TM, Morrison VA, Weller EA, Fisher RI, Peterson BA, Gascoyne RD, Horning SJ; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; Cancer and Leukemia Group B; Southwest Oncology Group. Comparison of conventional prognostic indices in patients older than 60 years with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP in the US Intergroup Study (ECOG 4494, CALGB 9793): consideration of age greater than 70 years in an elderly prognostic index (E-IPI). Br J Haematol. 2010 Oct;151(2):143-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08331.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 20371683Winter JN, Li S, Aurora V, Variakojis D, Nelson B, Krajewska M, Zhang L, Habermann TM, Fisher RI, Macon WR, Chhanabhai M, Felgar RE, Hsi ED, Medeiros LJ, Weick JK, Weller EA, Melnick A, Reed JC, Horning SJ, Gascoyne RD. Expression of p21 protein predicts clinical outcome in DLBCL patients older than 60 years treated with R-CHOP but not CHOP: a prospective ECOG and Southwest Oncology Group correlative study on E4494. Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Apr 15;16(8):2435-42. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1219. Epub 2010 Apr 6.
- Results publicationAurora V, Li S, Horning SJ, et al.: Prognostic significance of p53/p21 expression in DLBCL treated with CHOP or R-CHOP: a correlative study of E4494. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-8038, 450s, 2007.
- Results publicationMorrison VA, Weller EA, Habermann TM, et al.: Maintenance rituximab (MR) compared to observation (OBS) after R-CHOP or CHOP in older patients (pts) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): an Intergroup E4494/C9793 update. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-8011, 443s, 2007.
- Results publicationAdvani RH, Chen H, Habermann TM, et al.: Prognostic indices in older DLBCL patients receiving R-CHOP: an analysis of the U.S. Intergroup study (E4494, CALGB 9793). [Abstract] Blood 108 (11): A-813, 2006.
- Results publication: PubMed 16754935Habermann TM, Weller EA, Morrison VA, Gascoyne RD, Cassileth PA, Cohn JB, Dakhil SR, Woda B, Fisher RI, Peterson BA, Horning SJ. Rituximab-CHOP versus CHOP alone or with maintenance rituximab in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 1;24(19):3121-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.1003. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
- Results publication: PubMed 16449523Winter JN, Weller EA, Horning SJ, Krajewska M, Variakojis D, Habermann TM, Fisher RI, Kurtin PJ, Macon WR, Chhanabhai M, Felgar RE, Hsi ED, Medeiros LJ, Weick JK, Reed JC, Gascoyne RD. Prognostic significance of Bcl-6 protein expression in DLBCL treated with CHOP or R-CHOP: a prospective correlative study. Blood. 2006 Jun 1;107(11):4207-13. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-10-4222. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
- Results publicationMorrison V, Weller E, Habermann T, et al.: Dose intensity of CHOP alone or with rituximab in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in patients >60 years of age: an analysis of the intergroup trial ( CALGB 9793, ECOG-SWOG 4494). [Abstract] Ann Oncol 16 (Suppl 5): A-224, v102, 2005.
- Results publicationHabermann TM, Weller E, Morrison VA, et al.: Rituximab-CHOP versus CHOP with or without maintenance rituximab in patients 60 years of age or older with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): an update. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-127, 2004.
- Results publication: PubMed 27967294Morrison VA, Weller EA, Habermann TM, Li S, Fisher RI, Cheson BD, Peterson BA. Patterns of growth factor usage and febrile neutropenia among older patients with diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with CHOP or R-CHOP: the Intergroup experience (CALGB 9793; ECOG-SWOG 4494). Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 Aug;58(8):1814-1822. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1265111. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
Related trials for Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Ibrutinib Combination Therapy in Transplant Ineligible Individuals With Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma
Non-hodgkin Lymphoma
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Testing the Addition of an Anti-Cancer Drug, Glofitamab, to the Usual Chemotherapy Treatment (Alternating R-CHOP/R-DHAP) for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Ann Arbor Stage II Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Ann Arbor Stage III Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Brentuximab Vedotin and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With CD30-Positive Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, ALK-Negative
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Thomas M. Habermann, MD study chair
Mayo Clinic
Vicki A. Morrison, MD study chair
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Minneapolis
James K. Weick, MD study chair
Hematology Oncology Associates of the Palm Beaches
91 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing rituximab, CHOP regimen and cyclophosphamide in people with Lymphoma, run by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group at 91 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jun 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 91 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00003150, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jun 2013.