Cervical CancerPhase 3NCT00003078
Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin or Fluorouracil in Treating Patients With Cancer of the Cervix
A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin, fluorouracil and brachytherapy in people with Cervical Cancer, run by Gynecologic Oncology Group at 66 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining radiation therapy and chemotherapy may kill more tumor cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Cancer
- What is being tested?
- cisplatin, fluorouracil and brachytherapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 870 participants
- Where
- 66 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Oct 1997to Nov 2005
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Primary, previously untreated, histologically confirmed invasive squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix stage IIB, IIIB, or IVA Negative para-aortic lymph nodes determined by lymphangiogram, CT, MRI, or lymphadenectomy (excluding suspicious para-aortic lymph nodes) Para-aortic lymphadenectomy must be performed extraperitoneally or by laparoscopy No histologically confirmed cancer involving the para-aortic lymph nodes, intraperitoneal disease, or positive peritoneal cytology No recurrent invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix, regardless of previous treatment or cervix cancers other than squamous cell, adenosquamous, or adenocarcinoma No carcinoma of the cervical stump
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: Any age Performance status: GOG 0-3 Life expectancy: Not specified Hematopoietic: WBC at least 3,000/mm3 Platelet count at least 100,000/mm3 Hepatic: Bilirubin no greater than 1.5 times normal SGOT and alkaline phosphatase no greater than 3 times normal Renal: Creatinine no greater than 2.0 mg/dL Other: No septicemia or severe infection Not pregnant Negative pregnancy test Effective contraception required of fertile patients No other invasive malignancy unless disease free for at least 5 years and no prior cancer treatment that contraindicated this protocol therapy No concomitant malignancy other than nonmelanomatous skin cancer Must complete smoking history questionnaire and provide urine specimen for cotinine analysis
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: No prior cytotoxic chemotherapy Endocrine therapy: Not specified Radiotherapy: No prior radiation therapy to the pelvis Surgery: No prior hysterectomy
Trial locations and contacts
66 sites in 2 countries.
66 sites in 2 countries
United States65 sites
Abington Memorial Hospital
Abington, Pennsylvania, 19001
Cancer Center of Albany Medical Center
Albany, New York, 12208
CCOP - Ann Arbor Regional
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
Emory University Hospital - Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Johns Hopkins Oncology Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
Medicine Branch
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892
Radiation Oncology Branch
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892
CCOP - Montana Cancer Consortium
Billings, Montana, 59101
University of Alabama Comprehensive Cancer Center
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
State University of New York Health Science Center at Brooklyn
Brooklyn, New York, 11203
Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center
Camden, New Jersey, 08103
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7295
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425-0721
Cancer Center, University of Virginia HSC
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
University of Chicago Cancer Research Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Barrett Cancer Center, The University Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Ireland Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5065
Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital - Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Simmons Cancer Center - Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75235-9154
CCOP - Central Illinois
Decatur, Illinois, 62526
University of Colorado Cancer Center
Denver, Colorado, 80262
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Delaware County Memorial Hospital
Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania, 19026
Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
CCOP - Evanston
Evanston, Illinois, 60201
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
MBCCOP - Hawaii
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Indiana University Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-5265
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216-4505
CCOP - Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri, 64131
CCOP - Southern Nevada Cancer Research Foundation
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
Albert B. Chandler Medical Center, University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536-0084
USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033-0800
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1781
North Shore University Hospital
Manhasset, New York, 11030
CCOP - Baptist Cancer Institute
Memphis, Tennessee, 38117
Brookview Research, Inc.
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10021
University of Oklahoma College of Medicine
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73190
CCOP - Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium
Omaha, Nebraska, 68131
Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
Orange, California, 92868
Women's Cancer Center
Palo Alto, California, 94304
University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University - Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Pennsylvania Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111
CCOP - Greater Phoenix
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006-2726
CCOP - Columbia River Program
Portland, Oregon, 97213
University of Rochester Cancer Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98195-6043
CCOP - Upstate Carolina
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
State University of New York Health Sciences Center - Stony Brook
Stony Brook, New York, 11790-9832
Tacoma General Hospital
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Fred J. Woods Radiation Therapy Center/St. Joseph's Cancer Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33607
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33612
CCOP - Sooner State
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136
Vincent T. Lombardi Cancer Research Center, Georgetown University
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
Walter Reed Army Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20307-5000
Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157-1082
University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Comparison of Radiation vs Radiation Plus Weekly Cisplatin vs Radiation Plus PVI (Protracted Venous Infusion) 5-FU in Patients With Stage II-B, III-B, and IV-A Carcinoma of the Cervix With Negative Paraaortic Nodes
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining radiation therapy and chemotherapy may kill more tumor cells. It is not known whether receiving radiation therapy plus cisplatin is more effective than receiving radiation therapy plus fluorouracil in treating patients with cancer of the cervix.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of radiation therapy plus cisplatin or fluorouracil in treating patients with primary stage IIB, stage IIIB, or stage IVA cancer of the cervix.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the progression-free survival and survival of patients with advanced cervical cancer limited to the pelvis receiving either radiotherapy alone, or radiotherapy plus weekly cisplatin, or radiotherapy plus prolonged venous infusion (PVI) of fluorouracil. [Radiotherapy alone regimen closed 8/18/98] II. Determine the relative toxic effects of radiation therapy plus chemotherapy with either weekly cisplatin or PVI fluorouracil compared to radiation alone. [Radiotherapy alone regimen closed 8/18/98] IV. Compare the progression-free survival and survival of patients with advanced cervical cancer limited to the pelvis and who smoke at the time of diagnosis versus non-smokers and those who smoke during radiation therapy versus those who quit.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified by stage, performance of para-aortic lymphadenectomy, and brachytherapy method (HDR vs LDR). Prior to treatment patients complete a questionnaire regarding past and present smoking history and exposure to secondhand smoke. In arm I, patients undergo external radiation therapy to the pelvis once daily 5 times a week for 5 weeks. Then, patients receive either low dose rate or high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy in one or two applications or 5 fractions once or twice a week, respectively. If intracavitary radiation therapy cannot be performed, then shrinking field technique is executed. In addition, patients receive parametrial boost once daily for 3 to 5 days during intracavitary brachytherapy. Concurrently, patients receive IV cisplatin once a week for 5 weeks beginning on day 1 of external radiation therapy and once during the parametrial boost. Patients in arm II receive external radiation therapy and brachytherapy as previously described. [Arm II closed 8/18/98] In arm III, patients undergo external radiation therapy as described in arm I. In addition, patients receive prolonged venous infusion (PVI) fluorouracil daily for 5 days during external beam radiation therapy (whole pelvis and parametrial boost). If all 6 courses of cisplatin or fluorouracil cannot be administered during external radiation therapy, then the sixth course of chemotherapy will be given during brachytherapy. Patients are followed every 3 months for the first 2 years, then every 6 months for the next 3 years, then annually until death.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: This study will accrue a maximum of 870 patients over 66 months.
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer
- Being tested
- cisplatin, fluorouracil, brachytherapy, radiation therapy
- Keywords
- stage III cervical cancer, stage IIB cervical cancer, stage IVA cervical cancer, cervical squamous cell carcinoma, cervical adenocarcinoma, cervical adenosquamous cell carcinoma
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cisplatinDrug
fluorouracilDrug
brachytherapyRadiation
radiation therapyRadiation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jun 2004 (estimated)
- Study startOct 1997
- Primary completionNov 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervical CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Enrolment
- 870 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Gynecologic Oncology Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Investigators
- Rachelle M. Lanciano, MD, Study chair, Delaware County Regional Cancer Center at Delaware County Memorial Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003078
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000065771
- Other IDs
- GOG-0165
- Status last verified
- Apr 2011
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 9 Jul 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Rose PG, Ali S, Whitney CW, Lanciano R, Stehman FB. Outcome of stage IVA cervical cancer patients with disease limited to the pelvis in the era of chemoradiation: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Jun 1;121(3):542-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.02.024. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
PubMed 21420157Rose PG, Ali S, Whitney CW, Lanciano R, Stehman FB. Impact of hydronephrosis on outcome of stage IIIB cervical cancer patients with disease limited to the pelvis, treated with radiation and concurrent chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2010 May;117(2):270-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.01.045. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
PubMed 20181381Kunos C, Tian C, Waggoner S, Rose PG, Lanciano R. Retrospective analysis of concomitant Cisplatin during radiation in patients aged 55 years or older for treatment of advanced cervical cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009 Oct;19(7):1258-63. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181b33ace.
PubMed 19823064Gold MA, Tian C, Whitney CW, Rose PG, Lanciano R. Surgical versus radiographic determination of para-aortic lymph node metastases before chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer. 2008 May 1;112(9):1954-63. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23400.
PubMed 18338811Monk BJ, Tian C, Rose PG, Lanciano R. Which clinical/pathologic factors matter in the era of chemoradiation as treatment for locally advanced cervical carcinoma? Analysis of two Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) trials. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 May;105(2):427-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.12.027. Epub 2007 Feb 2.
PubMed 17275889Gold M, Tian C, Whitney CW, et al.: Surgical versus radiologic exclusion of para-aortic lymph node metastases relative to chemoradiation for loco-regionally advanced cervical carcinoma: a meta-analysis of Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) protocols 85, 120 & 165. [Abstract] Society of Gynecologic Oncologists, 2006 Annual Meeting on Women's Cancer, March 22-26, 2006, Palm Springs, CA. A-39, 2006.
Waggoner SE, Darcy KM, Tian C, Lanciano R. Smoking behavior in women with locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;202(3):283.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.884. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
PubMed 20044066Waggoner SE, Darcy KM, Fuhrman B, Parham G, Lucci J 3rd, Monk BJ, Moore DH; Gynecologic Oncology Group. Association between cigarette smoking and prognosis in locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with chemoradiation: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Dec;103(3):853-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.05.017. Epub 2006 Jul 3.
PubMed 16815535Lanciano R, Calkins A, Bundy BN, Parham G, Lucci JA 3rd, Moore DH, Monk BJ, O'Connor DM. Randomized comparison of weekly cisplatin or protracted venous infusion of fluorouracil in combination with pelvic radiation in advanced cervix cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 20;23(33):8289-95. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.0497. Epub 2005 Oct 17.
PubMed 16230678Varia MA, Bundy BN, Deppe G, Mannel R, Averette HE, Rose PG, Connelly P. Cervical carcinoma metastatic to para-aortic nodes: extended field radiation therapy with concomitant 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Dec 1;42(5):1015-23. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00267-3.
PubMed 9869224
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jul 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Comparison of Radiation vs Radiation Plus Weekly Cisplatin vs Radiation Plus PVI (Protracted Venous Infusion) 5-FU in Patients With Stage II-B, III-B, and IV-A Carcinoma of the Cervix With Negative Paraaortic Nodes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003078
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000065771
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer
- Keywords
- stage III cervical cancer, stage IIB cervical cancer, stage IVA cervical cancer, cervical squamous cell carcinoma, cervical adenocarcinoma, cervical adenosquamous cell carcinoma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 870 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Gynecologic Oncology GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Oct 1997
- Primary completion
- Nov 2005 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jun 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining radiation therapy and chemotherapy may kill more tumor cells. It is not known whether receiving radiation therapy plus cisplatin is more effective than receiving radiation therapy plus fluorouracil in treating patients with cancer of the cervix.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of radiation therapy plus cisplatin or fluorouracil in treating patients with primary stage IIB, stage IIIB, or stage IVA cancer of the cervix.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the progression-free survival and survival of patients with advanced cervical cancer limited to the pelvis receiving either radiotherapy alone, or radiotherapy plus weekly cisplatin, or radiotherapy plus prolonged venous infusion (PVI) of fluorouracil. [Radiotherapy alone regimen closed 8/18/98] II. Determine the relative toxic effects of radiation therapy plus chemotherapy with either weekly cisplatin or PVI fluorouracil compared to radiation alone. [Radiotherapy alone regimen closed 8/18/98] IV. Compare the progression-free survival and survival of patients with advanced cervical cancer limited to the pelvis and who smoke at the time of diagnosis versus non-smokers and those who smoke during radiation therapy versus those who quit.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified by stage, performance of para-aortic lymphadenectomy, and brachytherapy method (HDR vs LDR). Prior to treatment patients complete a questionnaire regarding past and present smoking history and exposure to secondhand smoke. In arm I, patients undergo external radiation therapy to the pelvis once daily 5 times a week for 5 weeks. Then, patients receive either low dose rate or high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy in one or two applications or 5 fractions once or twice a week, respectively. If intracavitary radiation therapy cannot be performed, then shrinking field technique is executed. In addition, patients receive parametrial boost once daily for 3 to 5 days during intracavitary brachytherapy. Concurrently, patients receive IV cisplatin once a week for 5 weeks beginning on day 1 of external radiation therapy and once during the parametrial boost. Patients in arm II receive external radiation therapy and brachytherapy as previously described. [Arm II closed 8/18/98] In arm III, patients undergo external radiation therapy as described in arm I. In addition, patients receive prolonged venous infusion (PVI) fluorouracil daily for 5 days during external beam radiation therapy (whole pelvis and parametrial boost). If all 6 courses of cisplatin or fluorouracil cannot be administered during external radiation therapy, then the sixth course of chemotherapy will be given during brachytherapy. Patients are followed every 3 months for the first 2 years, then every 6 months for the next 3 years, then annually until death.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: This study will accrue a maximum of 870 patients over 66 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cisplatin | Drug | – |
| fluorouracil | Drug | – |
| brachytherapy | Radiation | – |
| radiation therapy | Radiation | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jul 2013.
- Background: PubMed 21420157Rose PG, Ali S, Whitney CW, Lanciano R, Stehman FB. Outcome of stage IVA cervical cancer patients with disease limited to the pelvis in the era of chemoradiation: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Jun 1;121(3):542-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.02.024. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
- Background: PubMed 20181381Rose PG, Ali S, Whitney CW, Lanciano R, Stehman FB. Impact of hydronephrosis on outcome of stage IIIB cervical cancer patients with disease limited to the pelvis, treated with radiation and concurrent chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2010 May;117(2):270-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.01.045. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
- Background: PubMed 19823064Kunos C, Tian C, Waggoner S, Rose PG, Lanciano R. Retrospective analysis of concomitant Cisplatin during radiation in patients aged 55 years or older for treatment of advanced cervical cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009 Oct;19(7):1258-63. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181b33ace.
- Background: PubMed 18338811Gold MA, Tian C, Whitney CW, Rose PG, Lanciano R. Surgical versus radiographic determination of para-aortic lymph node metastases before chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer. 2008 May 1;112(9):1954-63. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23400.
- Background: PubMed 17275889Monk BJ, Tian C, Rose PG, Lanciano R. Which clinical/pathologic factors matter in the era of chemoradiation as treatment for locally advanced cervical carcinoma? Analysis of two Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) trials. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 May;105(2):427-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.12.027. Epub 2007 Feb 2.
- BackgroundGold M, Tian C, Whitney CW, et al.: Surgical versus radiologic exclusion of para-aortic lymph node metastases relative to chemoradiation for loco-regionally advanced cervical carcinoma: a meta-analysis of Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) protocols 85, 120 & 165. [Abstract] Society of Gynecologic Oncologists, 2006 Annual Meeting on Women's Cancer, March 22-26, 2006, Palm Springs, CA. A-39, 2006.
- Results publication: PubMed 20044066Waggoner SE, Darcy KM, Tian C, Lanciano R. Smoking behavior in women with locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;202(3):283.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.884. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 16815535Waggoner SE, Darcy KM, Fuhrman B, Parham G, Lucci J 3rd, Monk BJ, Moore DH; Gynecologic Oncology Group. Association between cigarette smoking and prognosis in locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with chemoradiation: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Dec;103(3):853-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.05.017. Epub 2006 Jul 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 16230678Lanciano R, Calkins A, Bundy BN, Parham G, Lucci JA 3rd, Moore DH, Monk BJ, O'Connor DM. Randomized comparison of weekly cisplatin or protracted venous infusion of fluorouracil in combination with pelvic radiation in advanced cervix cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 20;23(33):8289-95. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.0497. Epub 2005 Oct 17.
- Results publication: PubMed 9869224Varia MA, Bundy BN, Deppe G, Mannel R, Averette HE, Rose PG, Connelly P. Cervical carcinoma metastatic to para-aortic nodes: extended field radiation therapy with concomitant 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Dec 1;42(5):1015-23. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00267-3.
Related trials for Cervical Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Proton Re-irradiation in Patients With Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer , a Multicentre Phase II Single Arm Trial
Head & Neck Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 4
Lidocaine Infiltration and Neuroimmunomodulation in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rachelle M. Lanciano, MD study chair
Delaware County Regional Cancer Center at Delaware County Memorial Hospital
66 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin, fluorouracil and brachytherapy in people with Cervical Cancer, run by Gynecologic Oncology Group at 66 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jul 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 66 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00003078, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jul 2013.