LeukemiaPhase 3NCT00002517
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome
A Phase 3 study testing cytarabine, daunorubicin hydrochloride and dexamethasone in people with Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes, run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC at 23 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which regimen of combination chemotherapy is more effective for acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 14 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes
- What is being tested?
- cytarabine, daunorubicin hydrochloride and dexamethasone
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- 23 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 1993to May 2010
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 14 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) based on the cytological, cytochemical, and immunological criteria of the FAB classification
- Must meet 1 of the following criteria:
- More than 30% blasts in marrow (calculation based on the total number of nucleated cells except lymphocytes and plasmocytes)
- Presence of granulocytic sarcoma (chloroma)
- Disease must be associated with at least 1 of the following:
- More than 3% myeloperoxidase- or Sudan black-positive blasts
- More than 3% platelet peroxidase-positive blasts
- More than 20% esterase-positive blasts
- Immunological markers compatible with a myeloid differentiation, including 1 of the following criteria:
- Blasts positive for myeloid-associated antigen and negative for B- or T-lymphocyte antigens
- Blasts positive for at least 2 myeloid antigens (except CD3 and CD8)
- A cytogenetic abnormality associated with AML OR
- Newly diagnosed myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) based on the cytological and cytochemical criteria of the FAB classification
- Eligible subtypes:
- Refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB)
- RAEB in transformation
- Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
- No promyelocytic leukemia (M3 or M3v) treated with tretinoin (protocol EORTC-06915)
- No AML secondary to hematologic or malignant disease other than MDS
- Registration must occur within 48 hours of diagnosis
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
- Under 15
Performance status:
- Not specified
Life expectancy:
- Not specified
Hematopoietic:
- See Disease Characteristics
- No uncontrolled bleeding disorder
Hepatic:
- Not specified
Renal:
- No renal failure
Cardiovascular:
- No congenital heart disease
Other:
- No encephalopathy
- No genetic disorders
- No uncontrolled infection
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy:
- Not specified
Chemotherapy:
- Not specified
Endocrine therapy:
- Not specified
Radiotherapy:
- Not specified
Surgery:
- Not specified
Other:
- No prior antileukemic therapy
Trial locations and contacts
23 sites in 3 countries.
23 sites in 3 countries
France15 sites
Centre Hospitalier Regional et Universitaire d'Angers
Angers, 49033
CHR de Besancon - Hopital Saint-Jacques
Besançon, 25030
CHU de Caen
Caen, 14033
CHR de Grenoble - La Tronche
Grenoble, 38043
Centre Hospitalier Regional de Lille
Lille, 59037
Hopital Debrousse
Lyon, 69322
Hopital Arnaud de Villeneuve
Montpellier, 34295
CHR Hotel Dieu
Nantes, 44093
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
Nice, 06189
Hopital Robert Debre
Paris, 75019
Institut Curie - Section Medicale
Paris, 75248
Hopital Jean Bernard
Poitiers, 86021
Hopital Americain
Reims, 51092
Hopital Universitaire Hautepierre
Strasbourg, 67098
Hopital des Enfants (Purpan Enfants)
Toulouse, 31026
Belgium7 sites
Algemeen Ziekenhuis Middelheim
Antwerp, 2020
Hopital Universitaire Des Enfants Reine Fabiola
Brussels, 1020
Academisch Ziekenhuis der Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Brussels, 1090
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Ghent, B-9000
U.Z. Gasthuisberg
Leuven, B-3000
Centre Hospitalier Regional de la Citadelle
Liège, 4000
Clinique de l'Esperance
Montegnée, 4420
About this study
Official title: IDA VS MTZ IN INDUCTION AND INTENSIFICATION TREATMENT OF AML OR MDS IN CHILDREN, A PHASE III RANDOMIZED STUDY
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which regimen of combination chemotherapy is more effective for acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of different combination chemotherapy regimens in treating children who have newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the efficacy of idarubicin vs mitoxantrone in induction and first intensification in terms of achieving and maintaining complete remissions in children with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to center and disease type (de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) vs AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) vs MDS).
- Induction: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive cytarabine (ARA-C) IV continuously on days 1 and 2 and then IV over 30 minutes every 12 hours on days 3-8, mitoxantrone IV on days 3-5, etoposide (VP-16) IV over 1 hour on days 6-8, and ARA-C intrathecally (IT) on days 1 and 8.
- Arm II: Patients receive ARA-C and VP-16 as in arm I and idarubicin IV on days 3-5.
Patients on both arms with CNS disease at presentation receive ARA-C IT every 3 days until the CSF clears and then weekly until the first intensification. After induction, patients on both arms proceed to first intensification, regardless of response.
- First intensification: When blood counts recover and within 40 days after initiating induction, patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm III: Patients receive high-dose ARA-C IV over 3 hours every 12 hours on days 1-3 (if allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is planned) or days 1-4 (if allogeneic BMT is not planned) and mitoxantrone IV on days 7-9.
- Arm IV: Patients receive high-dose ARA-C as in arm III and idarubicin IV on days 7-9.
- Patients who achieve complete remission (CR) after first intensification and have an HLA-identical, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia-nonreactive, sibling donor undergo allogeneic BMT. Patients who achieve CR after intensification and have no suitable donor receive intensive chemotherapy as defined below. All patients with chloroma at presentation undergo local radiotherapy beginning after final intensification.
- Second intensification: When blood counts recover, patients receive daunorubicin IV continuously, ARA-C IV continuously, VP-16 IV continuously, oral thioguanine, and oral dexamethasone on days 1-4 and 11-14 and ARA-C IT on days 1, 4, 11, and 14.
- Third intensification: When blood counts recover, patients receive high-dose ARA-C IV over 3 hours every 12 hours on days 1-3 and VP-16 IV over 1 hour on days 2-5. When blood counts recover, autologous bone marrow is harvested in the event of subsequent relapse.
- Maintenance: When blood counts recover, patients receive oral thioguanine daily and ARA-C subcutaneously 4 days a month for 1 year.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 310 patients will be accrued for this study within 5 years.
- Conditions
- Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes
- Being tested
- cytarabine, daunorubicin hydrochloride, dexamethasone, etoposide, idarubicin
- Keywords
- childhood myelodysplastic syndromes, untreated childhood acute myeloid leukemia and other myeloid malignancies, childhood acute myeloblastic leukemia without maturation (M1), childhood acute myeloblastic leukemia with maturation (M2), childhood acute myelomonocytic leukemia (M4), childhood acute monoblastic leukemia (M5a), childhood acute monocytic leukemia (M5b), childhood acute erythroleukemia (M6), childhood acute megakaryocytic leukemia (M7), refractory anemia with excess blasts, refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, de novo myelodysplastic syndromes, childhood acute minimally differentiated myeloid leukemia (M0)
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Anemia, Refractory, with Excess of Blasts, Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cytarabineDrug
daunorubicin hydrochlorideDrug
dexamethasoneDrug
etoposideDrug
idarubicinDrug
mitoxantrone hydrochlorideDrug
thioguanineDrug
allogeneic bone marrow transplantationProcedure or surgery
radiation therapyRadiation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Study startMar 1993
- Primary completionMay 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Investigators
- Catherine Behar, MD, Study chair, Hopital Americain
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002517
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000078212
- Other IDs
- EORTC-58921
- Status last verified
- Dec 2002
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 22 Jun 2010
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Brunet AS, Ploton C, Galambrun C, Pondarre C, Pages MP, Bleyzac N, Freydiere AM, Barbe G, Bertrand Y. Low incidence of sepsis due to viridans streptococci in a ten-year retrospective study of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006 Nov;47(6):765-72. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20706.
PubMed 16333838Entz-Werle N, Suciu S, van der Werff ten Bosch J, Vilmer E, Bertrand Y, Benoit Y, Margueritte G, Plouvier E, Boutard P, Vandecruys E, Ferster A, Lutz P, Uyttebroeck A, Hoyoux C, Thyss A, Rialland X, Norton L, Pages MP, Philippe N, Otten J, Behar C; EORTC Children Leukemia Group. Results of 58872 and 58921 trials in acute myeloblastic leukemia and relative value of chemotherapy vs allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in first complete remission: the EORTC Children Leukemia Group report. Leukemia. 2005 Dec;19(12):2072-81. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403932.
PubMed 16136166
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jun 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- IDA VS MTZ IN INDUCTION AND INTENSIFICATION TREATMENT OF AML OR MDS IN CHILDREN, A PHASE III RANDOMIZED STUDY
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002517
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000078212
- Conditions
- Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes
- Keywords
- childhood myelodysplastic syndromes, untreated childhood acute myeloid leukemia and other myeloid malignancies, childhood acute myeloblastic leukemia without maturation (M1), childhood acute myeloblastic leukemia with maturation (M2), childhood acute myelomonocytic leukemia (M4), childhood acute monoblastic leukemia (M5a), childhood acute monocytic leukemia (M5b), childhood acute erythroleukemia (M6)
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTCResearch network
- Study start
- Mar 1993
- Primary completion
- May 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which regimen of combination chemotherapy is more effective for acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of different combination chemotherapy regimens in treating children who have newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the efficacy of idarubicin vs mitoxantrone in induction and first intensification in terms of achieving and maintaining complete remissions in children with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to center and disease type (de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) vs AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) vs MDS).
- Induction: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive cytarabine (ARA-C) IV continuously on days 1 and 2 and then IV over 30 minutes every 12 hours on days 3-8, mitoxantrone IV on days 3-5, etoposide (VP-16) IV over 1 hour on days 6-8, and ARA-C intrathecally (IT) on days 1 and 8.
- Arm II: Patients receive ARA-C and VP-16 as in arm I and idarubicin IV on days 3-5.
Patients on both arms with CNS disease at presentation receive ARA-C IT every 3 days until the CSF clears and then weekly until the first intensification. After induction, patients on both arms proceed to first intensification, regardless of response.
- First intensification: When blood counts recover and within 40 days after initiating induction, patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm III: Patients receive high-dose ARA-C IV over 3 hours every 12 hours on days 1-3 (if allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is planned) or days 1-4 (if allogeneic BMT is not planned) and mitoxantrone IV on days 7-9.
- Arm IV: Patients receive high-dose ARA-C as in arm III and idarubicin IV on days 7-9.
- Patients who achieve complete remission (CR) after first intensification and have an HLA-identical, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia-nonreactive, sibling donor undergo allogeneic BMT. Patients who achieve CR after intensification and have no suitable donor receive intensive chemotherapy as defined below. All patients with chloroma at presentation undergo local radiotherapy beginning after final intensification.
- Second intensification: When blood counts recover, patients receive daunorubicin IV continuously, ARA-C IV continuously, VP-16 IV continuously, oral thioguanine, and oral dexamethasone on days 1-4 and 11-14 and ARA-C IT on days 1, 4, 11, and 14.
- Third intensification: When blood counts recover, patients receive high-dose ARA-C IV over 3 hours every 12 hours on days 1-3 and VP-16 IV over 1 hour on days 2-5. When blood counts recover, autologous bone marrow is harvested in the event of subsequent relapse.
- Maintenance: When blood counts recover, patients receive oral thioguanine daily and ARA-C subcutaneously 4 days a month for 1 year.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 310 patients will be accrued for this study within 5 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 14 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cytarabine | Drug | – |
| daunorubicin hydrochloride | Drug | – |
| dexamethasone | Drug | – |
| etoposide | Drug | – |
| idarubicin | Drug | – |
| mitoxantrone hydrochloride | Drug | – |
| thioguanine | Drug | – |
| allogeneic bone marrow transplantation | Procedure or surgery | – |
| radiation therapy | Radiation | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jun 2010.
- Results publication: PubMed 16333838Brunet AS, Ploton C, Galambrun C, Pondarre C, Pages MP, Bleyzac N, Freydiere AM, Barbe G, Bertrand Y. Low incidence of sepsis due to viridans streptococci in a ten-year retrospective study of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006 Nov;47(6):765-72. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20706.
- Results publication: PubMed 16136166Entz-Werle N, Suciu S, van der Werff ten Bosch J, Vilmer E, Bertrand Y, Benoit Y, Margueritte G, Plouvier E, Boutard P, Vandecruys E, Ferster A, Lutz P, Uyttebroeck A, Hoyoux C, Thyss A, Rialland X, Norton L, Pages MP, Philippe N, Otten J, Behar C; EORTC Children Leukemia Group. Results of 58872 and 58921 trials in acute myeloblastic leukemia and relative value of chemotherapy vs allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in first complete remission: the EORTC Children Leukemia Group report. Leukemia. 2005 Dec;19(12):2072-81. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403932.
Related trials for Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 1
Vididencel in CML-CP Patients With MRD
CML (Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Catherine Behar, MD study chair
Hopital Americain
23 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing cytarabine, daunorubicin hydrochloride and dexamethasone in people with Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes, run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC at 23 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jun 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 23 sites in France, Belgium, Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00002517, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jun 2010.