HIV InfectionsNCT00002168
A Comparison of Two Anti-HIV Triple-Drug Combinations in HIV-Infected Patients
A study testing Indinavir sulfate, Lamivudine and Stavudine in people with HIV Infections, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 13 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of two anti-HIV drug combinations when given to HIV-infected patients who have never been treated with anti-HIV drugs. One drug combination is stavudine (d4T) plus didanosine (ddI) plus Crixivan. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Infections
- What is being tested?
- Indinavir sulfate, Lamivudine and Stavudine
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Start not givento not given
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must have:
- Documented HIV infection.
- CD4 cell count of 200 - 700 cells/mm3.
Who cannot join
- Co-existing Condition:
- Patients with the following symptoms or conditions are excluded:
- AIDS defining condition within 1 month of study entry.
- Prior Medication:
- Excluded:
- Patients with any history of antiretroviral therapy treatment.
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 2 countries.
13 sites in 2 countries
United States12 sites
East Bay AIDS Clinic
Berkeley, California, 94705
Univ of North Carolina / Infectious Disease Division
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
The Nalle Clinic / Clinical Research Dept
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207
Chicago Ctr for Clinical Research
Chicago, Illinois, 60610
Northwestern Univ
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Southwest Infectious Disease Association / PA
Dallas, Texas, 75225
Univ of Texas Southwestern Med Ctr of Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75235
Univ of Nebraska
Omaha, Nebraska, 68195
Univ of Pennsylvania / Infectious Diseases Division
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Harbor UCLA Med Ctr / Division of Immunology / N-24
Torrance, California, 90509
Anderson Clinical Research
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037
George Washington Med Ctr / Clinical Trials Unit
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037
About this study
Official title: An Open Label, Randomized, Comparative Study of Zerit (d4T) + Videx (ddI) + Crixivan Versus Retrovir (AZT) + Epivir (3TC) + Crixivan in HIV-Infected, Antiretroviral Naive Subjects With CD4 Cell Counts of 200 - 700/mm3 and HIV RNA Baseline Copy Number of >= 10,000 Copies/ml
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of two anti-HIV drug combinations when given to HIV-infected patients who have never been treated with anti-HIV drugs. One drug combination is stavudine (d4T) plus didanosine (ddI) plus Crixivan. The other combination is Retrovir (AZT) plus Epivir (3TC) plus Crixivan.
Read the detailed description
100 patients will be randomized to receive Zerit (Stavudine) + Videx (Didanosine) + Crixivan (Indinavir) and 100 patients will be randomized to receive Retrovir (Zidovudine) + Epivir (Lamivudine) + Crixivan (Indinavir).
Patients will be treated for 48 weeks.
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Being tested
- Indinavir sulfate, Lamivudine, Stavudine, Zidovudine, Didanosine
- Keywords
- Didanosine, Drug Therapy, Combination, Zidovudine, Stavudine, HIV Protease Inhibitors, CD4 Lymphocyte Count, Lamivudine, Indinavir, Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors, Anti-HIV Agents, Viral Load
- Medical subject headings
- HIV Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Indinavir sulfateDrug
LamivudineDrug
StavudineDrug
ZidovudineDrug
DidanosineDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2001 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HIV InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bristol-Myers SquibbThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Enrolment
- 200 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002168
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 260B
- Other IDs
- BMS 002
- Status last verified
- Oct 2007
- First submitted
- 2 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 2 Oct 2007
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Oct 2007. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open Label, Randomized, Comparative Study of Zerit (d4T) + Videx (ddI) + Crixivan Versus Retrovir (AZT) + Epivir (3TC) + Crixivan in HIV-Infected, Antiretroviral Naive Subjects With CD4 Cell Counts of 200 - 700/mm3 and HIV RNA Baseline Copy Number of >= 10,000 Copies/ml
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002168
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 260B
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Keywords
- Didanosine, Drug Therapy, Combination, Zidovudine, Stavudine, HIV Protease Inhibitors, CD4 Lymphocyte Count, Lamivudine, Indinavir
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers SquibbIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2001 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of two anti-HIV drug combinations when given to HIV-infected patients who have never been treated with anti-HIV drugs. One drug combination is stavudine (d4T) plus didanosine (ddI) plus Crixivan. The other combination is Retrovir (AZT) plus Epivir (3TC) plus Crixivan.
Detailed description
100 patients will be randomized to receive Zerit (Stavudine) + Videx (Didanosine) + Crixivan (Indinavir) and 100 patients will be randomized to receive Retrovir (Zidovudine) + Epivir (Lamivudine) + Crixivan (Indinavir).
Patients will be treated for 48 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Documented HIV infection.
- CD4 cell count of 200 - 700 cells/mm3.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- AIDS defining condition within 1 month of study entry.
- Patients with any history of antiretroviral therapy treatment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Indinavir sulfate | Drug | – |
| Lamivudine | Drug | – |
| Stavudine | Drug | – |
| Zidovudine | Drug | – |
| Didanosine | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Oct 2007.
Related trials for HIV Infections
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
13 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Indinavir sulfate, Lamivudine and Stavudine in people with HIV Infections, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 13 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2007.